IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i5p1713-d1341806.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Biomonitoring: Developing a Beehive Air Volatiles Profile as an Indicator of Environmental Contamination Using a Sustainable In-Field Technique

Author

Listed:
  • Daria Ilić

    (Center for Sensing Technologies, BioSense Institute, University of Novi Sad, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia)

  • Boris Brkić

    (Center for Sensing Technologies, BioSense Institute, University of Novi Sad, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia)

  • Maja Turk Sekulić

    (Department of Environmental Engineering and Occupational Safety and Health, Faculty of Technical Science, University of Novi Sad, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia)

Abstract

The wellbeing of the honey bee colonies and the health of humans are connected in numerous ways. Therefore, ensuring the wellbeing of bees is a crucial component of fostering sustainability and ecological harmony. The colony collapse disorder (CCD) phenomenon was first reported in 2006 when the majority of bee colonies in Europe died out, due to an increase in infections, contamination of hives with agrochemical pesticides, and persistent organic pollutants (POPs). Only 6 years after the emergence of CCD, more than 6.5 million premature deaths were reported, as a consequence of persistent human exposure to air pollution. The insect species such as the honey bee Apis mellifera L. and the air matrix inside the beehive can be used as tools in biomonitoring, instead of traditional monitoring methods. This may have advantages in terms of cost-effective bioindicators of the environmental health status, showing the ability to record spatial and temporal pollutant variations. In this study, we present the sustainable in-field usage of the portable membrane inlet mass spectrometry (MIMS) instrument for an instant and effective determination of the level of environmental pollution by analytical identification of hive atmosphere volatile organic compound (VOC) contaminants, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), monocyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (BTEX) compounds, and pesticides. The samples were taken from hives located in urbanized and rural regions, highlighting variations in contamination. The MIMS results were benchmarked against a conventional laboratory sampling technique, such as GC-MS.

Suggested Citation

  • Daria Ilić & Boris Brkić & Maja Turk Sekulić, 2024. "Biomonitoring: Developing a Beehive Air Volatiles Profile as an Indicator of Environmental Contamination Using a Sustainable In-Field Technique," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-11, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:5:p:1713-:d:1341806
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/5/1713/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/5/1713/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Richard J. Gill & Oscar Ramos-Rodriguez & Nigel E. Raine, 2012. "Combined pesticide exposure severely affects individual- and colony-level traits in bees," Nature, Nature, vol. 491(7422), pages 105-108, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Caleb Kiplimo Bett, 2017. "Factors Influencing Quality Honey Production," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 7(11), pages 281-292, November.
    2. Kleczkowski, Adam & Ellis, Ciaran & Hanley, Nick & Goulson, David, 2017. "Pesticides and bees: Ecological-economic modelling of bee populations on farmland," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 360(C), pages 53-62.
    3. G. Kleftodimos & N. Gallai & Ch. Kephaliacos, 2021. "Ecological-economic modeling of pollination complexity and pesticide use in agricultural crops," Journal of Bioeconomics, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 297-323, October.
    4. Berthet, Elsa T. & Bretagnolle, Vincent & Gaba, Sabrina, 2022. "Place-based social-ecological research is crucial for designing collective management of ecosystem services," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    5. Ullrika Sahlin & Maj Rundlöf, 2017. "Differences in the strengths of evidence matters in risk–risk trade-offs," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(8), pages 988-994, August.
    6. PK Gupta, 2018. "An Assessment of Relative Risks to Human/Ecological Health Biotech Crops versus Other Human Activities," Current Investigations in Agriculture and Current Research, Lupine Publishers, LLC, vol. 1(2), pages 51-62, February.
    7. Patricia A. Henríquez-Piskulich & Constanza Schapheer & Nicolas J. Vereecken & Cristian Villagra, 2021. "Agroecological Strategies to Safeguard Insect Pollinators in Biodiversity Hotspots: Chile as a Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-31, June.
    8. Mack, G. & Finger, R. & Ammann, J. & El Benni, N., 2023. "Modelling policies towards pesticide-free agricultural production systems," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    9. Aneta Bokšová & Jan Kazda & Martina Stejskalová & Tomáš Šubrt & Leoš Uttl & Petr Mráz & Jan Bartoška, 2021. "Findings of herbicide and fungicide residues in bee bread," Plant, Soil and Environment, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 67(6), pages 343-352.
    10. Lauren Brzozowski & Michael Mazourek, 2018. "A Sustainable Agricultural Future Relies on the Transition to Organic Agroecological Pest Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-25, June.
    11. Lauren C. Ponisio & Paul R. Ehrlich, 2016. "Diversification, Yield and a New Agricultural Revolution: Problems and Prospects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-15, November.
    12. Liu, Wenjing & Wang, Jingsheng & Li, Chao & Chen, Baoxiong & Sun, Yufang, 2019. "Using Bibliometric Analysis to Understand the Recent Progress in Agroecosystem Services Research," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 293-305.
    13. Banks, H.T. & Banks, J.E. & Bommarco, Riccardo & Laubmeier, A.N. & Myers, N.J. & Rundlöf, Maj & Tillman, Kristen, 2017. "Modeling bumble bee population dynamics with delay differential equations," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 351(C), pages 14-23.
    14. A Strouhova & J Velisek & A Stara, 2023. "Selected neonicotinoids and associated risk for aquatic organisms," Veterinární medicína, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 68(8), pages 313-336.
    15. Patricia P.A. Henríquez‐piskulich & Constanza Schapheer & Nicolas Vereecken & Cristian Villagra, 2021. "Agroecological strategies to safeguard insect pollinators in biodiversity hotspots: Chile as a case study," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/328659, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    16. Luciano Pilati & Mario Prestamburgo, 2016. "Sequential Relationship between Profitability and Sustainability: The Case of Migratory Beekeeping," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-8, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:5:p:1713-:d:1341806. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.