IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i2p807-d1320994.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Industry 4.0—Premise for Sustainability: Implementation Degree in Manufacturing Companies from Romania

Author

Listed:
  • Cristina Gavrus

    (Department of Engineering and Industrial Management, Transilvania University of Brasov, 500036 Brasov, Romania)

  • Ioana Mădălina Petre

    (Department of Engineering and Industrial Management, Transilvania University of Brasov, 500036 Brasov, Romania)

  • Luminița Pârv

    (Department of Manufacturing Engineering, Transilvania University of Brasov, 500036 Brasov, Romania)

Abstract

Industry 4.0 cannot be understood without sustainable development, being an essential condition for ensuring market success, economic growth, and minimal environmental impact. Considering the increase in interest for applying Industry 4.0 principles by industrial companies, the aim of this paper is to find the degree and benefits of implementing the new technologies by manufacturing engineering companies from Romania. The research methodology proposes testing the opinion of top managers regarding certain Industry 4.0 issues. Data processing and analysis was conducted by means of SPSS software. The obtained results revealed that industrial companies from Romania show quite a high interest in developing all the processes from a company regarding the entire process flow, from client order to product delivery. Moreover, small and micro companies that participated in this study have recorded notable scores in respect to implementing the principles of Industry 4.0, considering their flexibility and the communication among employees, which is more efficient than in case of large and medium companies. We concluded that this study facilitates an understanding of the degree of implementing Industry 4.0 principles by Romanian manufacturing companies that stands at the base of sustainable development of businesses.

Suggested Citation

  • Cristina Gavrus & Ioana Mădălina Petre & Luminița Pârv, 2024. "Industry 4.0—Premise for Sustainability: Implementation Degree in Manufacturing Companies from Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-19, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:2:p:807-:d:1320994
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/2/807/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/2/807/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John Hulland & Hans Baumgartner & Keith Marion Smith, 2018. "Marketing survey research best practices: evidence and recommendations from a review of JAMS articles," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 46(1), pages 92-108, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ryan Mullins & Raj Agnihotri, 2022. "Digital selling: organizational and managerial influences for frontline readiness and effectiveness," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 50(4), pages 800-821, July.
    2. Dominik M. Wielgos & Christian Homburg & Christina Kuehnl, 2021. "Digital business capability: its impact on firm and customer performance," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 49(4), pages 762-789, July.
    3. Goh Mei Ling, 2021. "Customer Satisfaction towards Mobile Food Delivery Apps during Covid-19 Pandemic," GATR Journals jmmr281, Global Academy of Training and Research (GATR) Enterprise.
    4. Talwar, Shalini & Kaur, Puneet & Escobar, Octavio & Lan, Sai, 2022. "Virtual reality tourism to satisfy wanderlust without wandering: An unconventional innovation to promote sustainability," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 128-143.
    5. Castaldo, Sandro & Ciacci, Andrea & Penco, Lara, 2023. "Perceived corporate social responsibility and job satisfaction in grocery retail: A comparison between low- and high-productivity stores," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    6. Lussier, Bruno & Philp, Matthew & Hartmann, Nathaniel N. & Wieland, Heiko, 2021. "Social anxiety and salesperson performance: The roles of mindful acceptance and perceived sales manager support," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 112-125.
    7. Surajit Bag & Shivam Gupta & Ajay Kumar & Uthayasankar Sivarajah, 2021. "An integrated artificial intelligence framework for knowledge creation and B2B marketing rational decision making for improving firm performance," Post-Print hal-03188195, HAL.
    8. Tao Zhang & Chao Feng & Hui Chen & Junjie Xian, 2022. "Calming the customers by AI: Investigating the role of chatbot acting-cute strategies in soothing negative customer emotions," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(4), pages 2277-2292, December.
    9. Cheah, Jun-Hwa & Lim, Xin-Jean & Ting, Hiram & Liu, Yide & Quach, Sara, 2022. "Are privacy concerns still relevant? Revisiting consumer behaviour in omnichannel retailing," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    10. Rieg Robert & Dobroszek Justyna & Zarzycka Ewelina, 2022. "Professionalisation of Family Firms and Accounting Function: Empirical Evidence," Central European Economic Journal, Sciendo, vol. 9(56), pages 113-131, January.
    11. Arsenovic, Jasenko & De Keyser, Arne & Edvardsson, Bo & Tronvoll, Bård & Gruber, Thorsten, 2021. "Justice (is not the same) for all: The role of relationship activity for post-recovery outcomes," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 342-351.
    12. van de Sanden, Stephanie & Willems, Kim & Brengman, Malaika, 2022. "How customers motive attributions impact intentions to use an interactive kiosk in-store," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    13. Lim, Xin-Jean & Cheah, Jun-Hwa & Ngo, Liem Viet & Chan, Kara & Ting, Hiram, 2023. "How do crazy rich Asians perceive sustainable luxury? Investigating the determinants of consumers’ willingness to pay a premium price," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    14. Hussam Al Halbusi & Pedro Jimenez Estevez & Tan Eleen & T. Ramayah & Md Uzir Hossain Uzir, 2020. "The Roles of The Physical Environment, Social Servicescape, Co-Created Value, and Customer Satisfaction in Determining Tourists’ Citizenship Behavior: Malaysian Cultural and Creative Industries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-23, April.
    15. Snyder, Hannah & Witell, Lars & Gustafsson, Anders & McColl-Kennedy, Janet R., 2022. "Consumer lying behavior in service encounters," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 755-769.
    16. Laxmi Gupta & Ravi Shankar, 2022. "Adoption of Battery Management System in Utility Grid: An Empirical Study Using Structural Equation Modeling," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 23(4), pages 573-596, December.
    17. John Hulland, 2020. "Conceptual review papers: revisiting existing research to develop and refine theory," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 10(1), pages 27-35, June.
    18. Jan-Benedict E. M. Steenkamp & Alberto Maydeu-Olivares, 2023. "Unrestricted factor analysis: A powerful alternative to confirmatory factor analysis," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 51(1), pages 86-113, January.
    19. Rahman, Muhammad Sabbir & Bag, Surajit & Hossain, Md Afnan & Abdel Fattah, Fadi Abdel Muniem & Gani, Mohammad Osman & Rana, Nripendra P., 2023. "The new wave of AI-powered luxury brands online shopping experience: The role of digital multisensory cues and customers’ engagement," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    20. Akter, Shahriar & Babu, Mujahid Mohiuddin & Hossain, Md Afnan & Hani, Umme, 2022. "Value co-creation on a shared healthcare platform: Impact on service innovation, perceived value and patient welfare," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 95-106.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:2:p:807-:d:1320994. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.