IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i2p617-d1316763.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Institutional and Actor Network Perspectives of Waste Management in Australia: Is the Construction Industry Prepared for a Circular Economy?

Author

Listed:
  • Benson Teck Heng Lim

    (School of Built Environment, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia)

  • Bee Lan Oo

    (School of Built Environment, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia)

  • Charlie McLeod

    (School of Built Environment, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia)

  • Pengqi Yang

    (School of Built Environment, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia)

Abstract

Waste management and minimization are touted to be two of the key drivers for greening the construction industry and a pathway to a circular economy. This research aims to revisit the attitudes and perceptions of project stakeholders towards construction and demolition (C&D) waste in the Australian construction industry and ascertain if the current state of play in construction would facilitate the transition to a circular economy. Statistical analysis was performed on an online survey dataset collected from 104 professionals within the Australian construction supply chain. The results reveal that construction professionals’ attitudes and perceptions to C&D waste could be classified into normative, regulatory and cultural cognitive drivers. Also, the perceived barriers and strategies of C&D waste management vary across design consultants and principal and sub-contractors. Overall, the evidence is suggestive that the Australian construction industry seems not fully ready for a circular economy. In terms of research implications, clearer guidelines and mandatory approaches to C&D waste management, involving a balance of incentivization and dis-incentivization actions, and close and stronger collaborations between the industry and government, are deemed necessary for better C&D waste management performance and the realization of a greener industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Benson Teck Heng Lim & Bee Lan Oo & Charlie McLeod & Pengqi Yang, 2024. "Institutional and Actor Network Perspectives of Waste Management in Australia: Is the Construction Industry Prepared for a Circular Economy?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-21, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:2:p:617-:d:1316763
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/2/617/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/2/617/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ajayi, Saheed O. & Oyedele, Lukumon O. & Bilal, Muhammad & Akinade, Olugbenga O. & Alaka, Hafiz A. & Owolabi, Hakeem A. & Kadiri, Kabir O., 2015. "Waste effectiveness of the construction industry: Understanding the impediments and requisites for improvements," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 101-112.
    2. Brown, Charlotte & Milke, Mark, 2016. "Recycling disaster waste: Feasibility, method and effectiveness," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 21-32.
    3. Begum, Rawshan Ara & Siwar, Chamhuri & Pereira, Joy Jacqueline & Jaafar, Abdul Hamid, 2009. "Attitude and behavioral factors in waste management in the construction industry of Malaysia," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 53(6), pages 321-328.
    4. C. S. Poon & Ann Yu & L. Jaillon, 2004. "Reducing building waste at construction sites in Hong Kong," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(5), pages 461-470.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Noushin Islam & Malindu Sandanayake & Shobha Muthukumaran & Dimuth Navaratna, 2024. "Review on Sustainable Construction and Demolition Waste Management—Challenges and Research Prospects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-30, April.
    2. Jiménez-Rivero, Ana & García-Navarro, Justo, 2017. "Exploring factors influencing post-consumer gypsum recycling and landfilling in the European Union," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 116-123.
    3. Li, Mei & Yang, Jay, 2014. "Critical factors for waste management in office building retrofit projects in Australia," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 85-98.
    4. Jianguo Chen & Yangyue Su & Hongyun Si & Jindao Chen, 2018. "Managerial Areas of Construction and Demolition Waste: A Scientometric Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-20, October.
    5. Esa, Mohd Reza & Halog, Anthony & Rigamonti, Lucia, 2017. "Strategies for minimizing construction and demolition wastes in Malaysia," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 219-229.
    6. Heni Fitriani & Saheed Ajayi & Sunkuk Kim, 2022. "Analysis of the Underlying Causes of Waste Generation in Indonesia’s Construction Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-18, December.
    7. Zhikun Ding & Xinyue Huang & Xinrui Wang & Qiaohui Chen & Jiasheng Zhang & Zezhou Wu, 2024. "Investigating the Determinants of Construction Stakeholders’ Intention to Use Construction and Demolition Waste Recycling Products Based on the S-O-R Model in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-17, March.
    8. Gangolells, Marta & Casals, Miquel & Forcada, Núria & Macarulla, Marcel, 2014. "Analysis of the implementation of effective waste management practices in construction projects and sites," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 99-111.
    9. Rosaria E.C. Amaral & Joel Brito & Matt Buckman & Elicia Drake & Esther Ilatova & Paige Rice & Carlos Sabbagh & Sergei Voronkin & Yewande S. Abraham, 2020. "Waste Management and Operational Energy for Sustainable Buildings: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-21, July.
    10. Baldwin, Andrew & Poon, Chi-Sun & Shen, Li-Yin & Austin, Simon & Wong, Irene, 2009. "Designing out waste in high-rise residential buildings: Analysis of precasting methods and traditional construction," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(9), pages 2067-2073.
    11. Atiq Zaman & Ana Maria Caceres Ruiz & Salman Shooshtarian & Tim Ryley & Savindi Caldera & Tayyab Maqsood, 2023. "Development of the Circular Economy Design Guidelines for the Australian Built Environment Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-26, January.
    12. Ademilade Aboginije & Clinton Aigbavboa & Wellington Thwala, 2021. "A Holistic Assessment of Construction and Demolition Waste Management in the Nigerian Construction Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-14, June.
    13. Paulina Guerrero-Miranda & Arturo Luque González, 2021. "Social Responsibility, Sustainability, and Public Policy: The Lessons of Debris Management after the Manabí Earthquake in Ecuador," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-15, March.
    14. Lu, Weisheng & Yuan, Hongping, 2010. "Exploring critical success factors for waste management in construction projects of China," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 55(2), pages 201-208.
    15. Li, Jingru & Ding, Zhikun & Mi, Xuming & Wang, Jiayuan, 2013. "A model for estimating construction waste generation index for building project in China," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 20-26.
    16. Li, Jingru & Tam, Vivian W.Y. & Zuo, Jian & Zhu, Jiaolan, 2015. "Designers’ attitude and behaviour towards construction waste minimization by design: A study in Shenzhen, China," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 105(PA), pages 29-35.
    17. Niluka Domingo & Heshani M. Edirisinghe & Ravindu Kahandawa & Gayan Wedawatta, 2024. "Generalised Linear Modelling for Construction Waste Estimation in Residential Projects: Case Study in New Zealand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-14, February.
    18. Yuanhong Liao & Weihong Yang, 2022. "The determinants of different types of private-sphere pro-environmental behaviour: an integrating framework," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(6), pages 8566-8592, June.
    19. Seungho Cho & Seunguk Na, 2017. "The Reduction of CO 2 Emissions by Application of High-Strength Reinforcing Bars to Three Different Structural Systems in South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-24, September.
    20. Park, Joo Young, 2014. "Assessing determinants of industrial waste reuse: The case of coal ash in the United States," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 116-127.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:2:p:617-:d:1316763. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.