IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/recore/v106y2016icp21-32.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Recycling disaster waste: Feasibility, method and effectiveness

Author

Listed:
  • Brown, Charlotte
  • Milke, Mark

Abstract

Recycling is often employed as part of a disaster waste management system. However, the feasibility, method and effectiveness of recycling varies between disaster events. This qualitative study is based on literature reviews, expert interviews and active participatory research of five international disaster events in developed countries (2009 Victorian Bushfires, Australia; 2009L’Aquila earthquake, Italy; 2005 Hurricane Katrina, United States; 2010 and 2011 Canterbury earthquakes, New Zealand; 2011 Great East Japan earthquake) to answer three questions: What are the main factors that affect the feasibility of recycling post-disaster? When is on-site or off-site separation more effective? What management approaches improve recycling effectiveness? Seven disaster-specific factors need to be assessed to determine the feasibility of disaster waste recycling programmes: volume of waste; degree of mixing of waste; human and environmental health hazards; areal extent of the waste; community priorities; funding mechanisms; and existing and disaster-specific regulations. The appropriateness of on or off-site waste separation depends on four factors: time constraints; resource availability; degree of mixing of waste and human and public health hazards. Successful recycling programmes require good management including clear and well enforced policies (through good contracts or regulations) and pre-event planning. Further research into post-disaster recycling markets, funding mechanisms and recycling in developing countries is recommended.

Suggested Citation

  • Brown, Charlotte & Milke, Mark, 2016. "Recycling disaster waste: Feasibility, method and effectiveness," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 21-32.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:recore:v:106:y:2016:i:c:p:21-32
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.10.021
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344915301191
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.10.021?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fetter, Gary & Rakes, Terry, 2012. "Incorporating recycling into post-disaster debris disposal," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 14-22.
    2. Hsiao, T. Y. & Huang, Y. T. & Yu, Y. H. & Wernick, I. K., 2002. "Modeling materials flow of waste concrete from construction and demolition wastes in Taiwan," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 28(1-2), pages 39-47.
    3. Xiao, Jianzhuang & Xie, He & Zhang, Chuanzeng, 2012. "Investigation on building waste and reclaim in Wenchuan earthquake disaster area," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 109-117.
    4. Denhart, Hazel, 2010. "Deconstructing disaster: Economic and environmental impacts of deconstruction in post-Katrina New Orleans," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 54(3), pages 194-204.
    5. William E. Roper, 2008. "Waste management policy revisions: lessons learned from the Katrina disaster," International Journal of Environmental Technology and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 8(2/3), pages 275-309.
    6. Kristen B. Ardani & Charles C. Reith & C. Josh Donlan, 2009. "Harnessing Catastrophe to Promote Resource Recovery and Eco‐industrial Development," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 13(4), pages 579-591, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cheng, Cheng & Lu, Jia-Wei & Zhu, Rui & Xiao, Zuopeng & Costa, Alysson M. & Thompson, Russell G., 2022. "An integrated multi-objective model for disaster waste clean-up systems optimization," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    2. Paulina Guerrero-Miranda & Arturo Luque González, 2021. "Social Responsibility, Sustainability, and Public Policy: The Lessons of Debris Management after the Manabí Earthquake in Ecuador," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-15, March.
    3. Benson Teck Heng Lim & Bee Lan Oo & Charlie McLeod & Pengqi Yang, 2024. "Institutional and Actor Network Perspectives of Waste Management in Australia: Is the Construction Industry Prepared for a Circular Economy?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-21, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Breve Ferrari, Alejandra & Fannin, J. Matthew, "undated". "Using System Dynamics for Optimal Debris Management in a Changing Policy Environment," 2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Boston, Massachusetts 235863, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    2. Shi, Jianguang & Xu, Yuezhou, 2006. "Estimation and forecasting of concrete debris amount in China," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 49(2), pages 147-158.
    3. Cheng, Cheng & Lu, Jia-Wei & Zhu, Rui & Xiao, Zuopeng & Costa, Alysson M. & Thompson, Russell G., 2022. "An integrated multi-objective model for disaster waste clean-up systems optimization," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    4. Gi-Wook Cha & Young-Chan Kim & Hyeun Jun Moon & Won-Hwa Hong, 2017. "The Effects of Data Collection Method and Monitoring of Workers’ Behavior on the Generation of Demolition Waste," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-14, October.
    5. Nihal Berktaş & Bahar Yetiş Kara & Oya Ekin Karaşan, 2016. "Solution methodologies for debris removal in disaster response," EURO Journal on Computational Optimization, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 4(3), pages 403-445, September.
    6. Zhao, W. & Ren, H. & Rotter, V.S., 2011. "A system dynamics model for evaluating the alternative of type in construction and demolition waste recycling center – The case of Chongqing, China," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 55(11), pages 933-944.
    7. Zhao, W. & Leeftink, R.B. & Rotter, V.S., 2010. "Evaluation of the economic feasibility for the recycling of construction and demolition waste in China—The case of Chongqing," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 54(6), pages 377-389.
    8. Jin, Ruoyu & Li, Bo & Zhou, Tongyu & Wanatowski, Dariusz & Piroozfar, Poorang, 2017. "An empirical study of perceptions towards construction and demolition waste recycling and reuse in China," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 86-98.
    9. Aid, Graham & Eklund, Mats & Anderberg, Stefan & Baas, Leenard, 2017. "Expanding roles for the Swedish waste management sector in inter-organizational resource management," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 85-97.
    10. Paulina Guerrero-Miranda & Arturo Luque González, 2021. "Social Responsibility, Sustainability, and Public Policy: The Lessons of Debris Management after the Manabí Earthquake in Ecuador," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-15, March.
    11. Dace, Elina & Bazbauers, Gatis & Berzina, Alise & Davidsen, Pål I., 2014. "System dynamics model for analyzing effects of eco-design policy on packaging waste management system," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 175-190.
    12. Özdamar, Linet & Ertem, Mustafa Alp, 2015. "Models, solutions and enabling technologies in humanitarian logistics," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(1), pages 55-65.
    13. Marzouk, Mohamed & Azab, Shimaa, 2014. "Environmental and economic impact assessment of construction and demolition waste disposal using system dynamics," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 41-49.
    14. Fetter, Gary & Rakes, Terry, 2012. "Incorporating recycling into post-disaster debris disposal," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 14-22.
    15. Rosa Agliata & Alfonso Marino & Luigi Mollo & Paolo Pariso, 2020. "Historic Building Energy Audit and Retrofit Simulation with Hemp-Lime Plaster—A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-16, June.
    16. Muhammad Salman Habib & Biswajit Sarkar, 2017. "An Integrated Location-Allocation Model for Temporary Disaster Debris Management under an Uncertain Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-26, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:recore:v:106:y:2016:i:c:p:21-32. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kai Meng (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/resources-conservation-and-recycling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.