IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i7p6130-d1114475.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Adoption of Building Information Modelling in the Saudi Construction Industry: An Interpretive Structural Modelling

Author

Listed:
  • Naif Alaboud

    (Department of Islamic Architecture, College of Engineering and Islamic Architecture, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah Al-Mukarramah 24382, Saudi Arabia)

  • Adnan Alshahrani

    (Department of Islamic Architecture, College of Engineering and Islamic Architecture, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah Al-Mukarramah 24382, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

The Saudi Vision 2030 is a program of change management on a national level driven mostly by the use of digital technology. The implementation of building information modelling (BIM) is part of this change, and there is general agreement that its use improves the productivity and quality of the architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) industries. Despite its extensive construction projects, Saudi Arabia has only recently planned for BIM. Several conditions must apply before it is successfully implemented. While the literature has identified the factors critical to its success and the barriers to its adoption, few studies have rated these factors in terms of their importance and their contingent impact. Furthermore, the interactional relationship between the factors has rarely been investigated. As a result, an interpretative structural model (ISM) was conducted to establish a hierarchy of variables, while accounting for the dynamic interaction between each. For factor selection, the matrix-based multiplication applied to a classification (MICMAC) method was utilized. Therefore, awareness of BIM and sustainability benefits are expected to be the most important variables in acceptance. Furthermore, the dynamic method is gradually shifting from bottom-down to a combined effect of top-down and bottom-up leadership.

Suggested Citation

  • Naif Alaboud & Adnan Alshahrani, 2023. "Adoption of Building Information Modelling in the Saudi Construction Industry: An Interpretive Structural Modelling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-21, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:7:p:6130-:d:1114475
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/7/6130/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/7/6130/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lorraine Whitmarsh, 2008. "Are flood victims more concerned about climate change than other people? The role of direct experience in risk perception and behavioural response," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(3), pages 351-374, April.
    2. Seyed Armin Mirhosseini & Reza Kiani Mavi & Neda Kiani Mavi & Behzad Abbasnejad & Farzaneh Rayani, 2020. "Interrelations among Leadership Competencies of BIM Leaders: A Fuzzy DEMATEL-ANP Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-30, September.
    3. David, Paul A. & Steinmueller, W. Edward, 1994. "Economics of compatibility standards and competition in telecommunication networks," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 6(3-4), pages 217-241, December.
    4. Lemola, Tarmo, 2002. "Convergence of national science and technology policies: the case of Finland," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(8-9), pages 1481-1490, December.
    5. Anat Anaqie Zahidy & Shahryar Sorooshian & Zahidy Abd Hamid, 2019. "Critical Success Factors for Corporate Social Responsibility Adoption in the Construction Industry in Malaysia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-24, November.
    6. Oludolapo Ibrahim Olanrewaju & Ahmed Farouk Kineber & Nicholas Chileshe & David John Edwards, 2021. "Modelling the Impact of Building Information Modelling (BIM) Implementation Drivers and Awareness on Project Lifecycle," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-23, August.
    7. Ermal Hetemi & Joaquin Ordieres-Meré & Cali Nuur, 2020. "An Institutional Approach to Digitalization in Sustainability-Oriented Infrastructure Projects: The Limits of the Building Information Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-20, May.
    8. Serdar Durdyev & Gholamreza Dehdasht & Saeed Reza Mohandes & David J. Edwards, 2021. "Review of the Building Information Modelling (BIM) Implementation in the Context of Building Energy Assessment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-15, December.
    9. Sarah Sharma & Susanne Soederberg, 2020. "Redesigning the business of development: the case of the World Economic Forum and global risk management," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(4), pages 828-854, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Leandra Bezerra dos Santos & Fagner José Coutinho de Melo & Djalma Silva Guimaraes Junior & Eryka Fernanda Miranda Sobral & Denise Dumke de Medeiros, 2023. "Application of ISM to Identify the Contextual Relationships between the Sustainable Solutions Based on the Principles and Pillars of Industry 4.0: A Sustainability 4.0 Model for Law Offices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-20, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Abinash Bhattachan & Matthew D. Jurjonas & Priscilla R. Morris & Paul J. Taillie & Lindsey S. Smart & Ryan E. Emanuel & Erin L. Seekamp, 2019. "Linking residential saltwater intrusion risk perceptions to physical exposure of climate change impacts in rural coastal communities of North Carolina," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 97(3), pages 1277-1295, July.
    2. Emil Velinov & Milan Maly & Yelena Petrenko & Igor Denisov & Vasko Vassilev, 2020. "The Role of Top Management Team Digitalization and Firm Internationalization for Sustainable Business," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-11, November.
    3. Azilah Kasim & Siti Noormala Jailani & Muhammad Fauzi Mokhtar & Jasmine Zea Raziah Radha Rashid Radha & Bussalin Khuadthong & Maebel Leong Sai Fong, 2023. "Community Perceptions on the Critical Success Factors of Hotels’ Community-Based Corporate Social Responsibility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-26, June.
    4. Al-Baraa Abdulrahman Al-Mekhlafi & Idris Othman & Ahmed Farouk Kineber & Ahmad A. Mousa & Ahmad M. A. Zamil, 2022. "Modeling the Impact of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOC) Implementation Factors on Continuance Intention of Students: PLS-SEM Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-15, April.
    5. Victoria Pagan & Kathryn Haynes & Stefanie Reissner, 2023. "Accountable Selves and Responsibility Within a Global Forum," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 187(2), pages 255-270, October.
    6. Debra Javeline & Tracy Kijewski-Correa & Angela Chesler, 2019. "Does it matter if you “believe” in climate change? Not for coastal home vulnerability," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 155(4), pages 511-532, August.
    7. Bernd Ebersberger & Nils Mevenkamp, 2016. "Open Innovation in Eastern Europe and Central Asia," Journal of Business Administration Research, Journal of Business Administration Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 5(2), pages 8-19, October.
    8. Maryam Hussain Abal-Seqan & Shaligram Pokharel & Khalid Kamal Naji, 2023. "Key Success Factors and Their Impact on the Performance of Construction Projects: Case in Qatar," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-20, February.
    9. Frisch, L.C. & Mathis, J.T. & Kettle, N.P. & Trainor, S.F., 2015. "Gauging perceptions of ocean acidification in Alaska," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 101-110.
    10. Kevin Fox Gotham & Richard Campanella & Katie Lauve‐Moon & Bradford Powers, 2018. "Hazard Experience, Geophysical Vulnerability, and Flood Risk Perceptions in a Postdisaster City, the Case of New Orleans," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(2), pages 345-356, February.
    11. van der Linden, Sander, 2014. "On the relationship between personal experience, affect and risk perception: the case of climate change," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 57689, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    12. Groh, Elke D. & Möllendorff, Charlotte v., 2020. "What shapes the support of renewable energy expansion? Public attitudes between policy goals and risk, time, and social preferences," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    13. Kanberger, Elke D. & Ziegler, Andreas, 2023. "On the preferences for an environmentally friendly and fair energy transition: A stated choice experiment for Germany," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    14. Jiuchang Wei & Weiwei Zhu & Dora Marinova & Fei Wang, 2017. "Household adoption of smog protective behavior: a comparison between two Chinese cities," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(7), pages 846-867, July.
    15. Donatella Baiardi, 2021. "What do you think about climate change?," Working Papers 477, University of Milano-Bicocca, Department of Economics, revised Aug 2021.
    16. Hanna Obracht-Prondzyńska & Ewa Duda & Helena Anacka & Jolanta Kowal, 2022. "Greencoin as an AI-Based Solution Shaping Climate Awareness," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-25, September.
    17. Anna Kwiotkowska & Radosław Wolniak & Bożena Gajdzik & Magdalena Gębczyńska, 2022. "Configurational Paths of Leadership Competency Shortages and 4.0 Leadership Effectiveness: An fs/QCA Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-21, February.
    18. Van R Haden & Meredith T Niles & Mark Lubell & Joshua Perlman & Louise E Jackson, 2012. "Global and Local Concerns: What Attitudes and Beliefs Motivate Farmers to Mitigate and Adapt to Climate Change?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(12), pages 1-7, December.
    19. Torregrosa, Sara & Pelkonen, Antti & Oksanen, Juha & Kander, Astrid, 2017. "Impact of innovation policy on firm innovation – A comparison of Finland and Sweden, 1970-2013," Lund Papers in Economic History 160, Lund University, Department of Economic History.
    20. Kristin B. Dobbin & Amanda L. Fencl & Gregory Pierce & Melissa Beresford & Silvia Gonzalez & Wendy Jepson, 2023. "Understanding perceived climate risks to household water supply and their implications for adaptation: evidence from California," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 176(4), pages 1-20, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:7:p:6130-:d:1114475. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.