IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i7p5696-d1106292.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What Drives Profit Income in Mexico’s Main Banks? Evidence Using Machine Learning

Author

Listed:
  • Carlos González-Rossano

    (Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales, Universidad Panamericana, Ciudad de México 03920, Mexico)

  • Antonia Terán-Bustamante

    (Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales, Universidad Panamericana, Ciudad de México 03920, Mexico)

  • Marisol Velázquez-Salazar

    (Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales, Universidad Panamericana, Ciudad de México 03920, Mexico)

  • Antonieta Martínez-Velasco

    (Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Panamericana, Ciudad de México 03920, Mexico)

Abstract

Historically, the banking system has been critical to the development of economies by addressing funds efficiently—from customer savings and investors to the productive activities of people and companies, financing consumer goods and current expenses, housing, infrastructure projects and providing liquidity to the market. However, it must be transformed to respond to emerging demands in society for better financial products and services with a positive impact on living conditions and well-being. To achieve this, banks must create economic value—that is to say, banks should create profits in a sustained manner—in order to also create social value and thus generate shared value. The purpose of this study was twofold. The first aim was to identify the main factors that contributed to the majority of Mexican banking profits in the period from 2003 to 2021; the second aim of the study was to provide an innovative metric of banking performance. Using supervised machine learning algorithms and Principal Component Analysis, two prediction models were tested, and two banking performance indices were defined. The findings show that Random Forest is a reliable profit prediction model with a lower mean absolute error between the predicted yearly profit and losses and the actual data. There are no significant ranking position differences between the two performance indices. The first performance index obtained is novel due to its simplicity, since it is built on the basis of five values associated with commercial banking activity. In Mexico, no similar studies have been published. The indicator most widely used by regulators worldwide is the CAMELS index, which is a weighted average of the capital adequacy level, asset quality, management capacity, profitability, liquidity, and sensitivity to market risk. Its scale of 1 to 5 is useful for identifying the robustness and solvency of a bank, but not necessarily its capacity to generate profits. This approach might encourage banks to remain aware of their potential to create shared value and to develop competitive strategies to increase benefits for stakeholders.

Suggested Citation

  • Carlos González-Rossano & Antonia Terán-Bustamante & Marisol Velázquez-Salazar & Antonieta Martínez-Velasco, 2023. "What Drives Profit Income in Mexico’s Main Banks? Evidence Using Machine Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-19, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:7:p:5696-:d:1106292
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/7/5696/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/7/5696/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ignacio Jiménez-Hernández & Gabriel Palazzo & Francisco Javier Sáez-Fernández, 2019. "Determinants of bank efficiency: evidence from the Latin American banking industry," Applied Economic Analysis, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 27(81), pages 184-206, October.
    2. Stewart Jones & Christopher Wright, 2018. "Fashion or future: does creating shared value pay?," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 58(4), pages 1111-1139, December.
    3. Agnes Festre & Eric Nasica, 2009. "Schumpeter on money, banking and finance: an institutionalist perspective," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(2), pages 325-356.
    4. Lewis Gaul & Jonathan Jones & Pinar Uysal, 2019. "Forecasting High-Risk Composite CAMELS Ratings," International Finance Discussion Papers 1252, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).
    5. Patricia Doyle Corner & Kathryn Pavlovich, 2016. "Shared Value Through Inner Knowledge Creation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 135(3), pages 543-555, May.
    6. Caselli Mauro & Somekh Babak, 2021. "Access to Banking and the Role of Inequality and the Financial Crisis," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 21(4), pages 1373-1410, October.
    7. Md. Rabiul Islam & Syed Zabid Hossain, 2019. "Conceptual mapping of shared value creation by the private commercial banks in Bangladesh," Asian Journal of Sustainability and Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 1-20, December.
    8. Krzysztof Dembek & Prakash Singh & Vikram Bhakoo, 2016. "Literature Review of Shared Value: A Theoretical Concept or a Management Buzzword?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 137(2), pages 231-267, August.
    9. Hicks, J. R., 1969. "A Theory of Economic History," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198811633.
    10. Ta-Kai Yang & Min-Ren Yan, 2020. "The Corporate Shared Value for Sustainable Development: An Ecosystem Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-16, March.
    11. José M. Brotons & Manuel E. Sansalvador, 2020. "The relation between corporate social responsibility certification and financial performance: An empirical study in Spain," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(3), pages 1465-1477, May.
    12. Salmony, Michael, 2019. "Banks taking back control," Journal of Payments Strategy & Systems, Henry Stewart Publications, vol. 13(1), pages 13-19, March.
    13. Eric Nasica & Agnès Festré, 2009. "Schumpeter on money, banking and finance: an institutionalist perspective," Post-Print halshs-00720753, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wei‐jian Li & Wei Zhu & Bin Wang, 2023. "The impact of creating shared value strategy on corporate sustainable development: From resources perspective," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(5), pages 2362-2384, September.
    2. Shinya Takata & Young Won Park & Takahiro Ohno, 2022. "Research on the Effects and Factors of CSV Activities by Sector in Japanese Firms: Analysis Considering the Relationships with Management and Communication Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-18, August.
    3. Havran, Dániel, 2017. "Schumpeter a tőkepiacon. Schumpeter finanszírozási elméletének fejlődése és életrajzi vonatkozásai [Schumpeter on the capital market: the evolution and biographical relations of Schumpeter's credit," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(10), pages 1056-1072.
    4. Servaas Storm, 2018. "Financialization and Economic Development: A Debate on the Social Efficiency of Modern Finance," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 49(2), pages 302-329, March.
    5. Mário Graça Moura, 2017. "Schumpeter and the meanings of rationality," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 27(1), pages 115-138, January.
    6. Festré, Agnès & Garrouste, Pierre, 2016. "Wieser As A Theorist Of Institutional Change," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Cambridge University Press, vol. 38(4), pages 463-483, December.
    7. Lumnije Thaçi, 2022. "Bank Loans Types and Economic Growth - Literature Review," European Journal of Economics and Business Studies Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 8, July -Dec.
    8. Philippe Aghion & Agnès Festré, 2017. "Schumpeterian growth theory, Schumpeter, and growth policy design," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 27(1), pages 25-42, January.
    9. Kwon, Deuksin & Lee, Ha Young & Cho, Joon Hyung & Sohn, So Young, 2023. "Effect of an open patent pool strategy on technology innovation in terms of creating shared value," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    10. Callegari, Beniamino & Nybakk, Erlend, 2022. "Schumpeterian theory and research on forestry innovation and entrepreneurship: The state of the art, issues and an agenda," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    11. Xiuxiu Jiang & Xia Wang & Jia Ren & Zhimin Xie, 2021. "The Nexus between Digital Finance and Economic Development: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-17, June.
    12. Cristiano Antonelli & Christophe Feder, 2023. "The foundations of Schumpeterian dynamics: The European evidence," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 65-96, January.
    13. Manuel Ángel Fernández-Gámez & A. Manuel Gutiérrez-Ruiz & Rafael Becerra-Vicario & Daniel Ruiz-Palomo, 2019. "The Effects of Creating Shared Value on the Hotel Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-16, March.
    14. Lorenzo Esposito & Giuseppe Mastromatteo, "undated". "In the Long Run We Are All Herd: On the Nature and Outcomes of the Beauty Contest," Economics Working Paper Archive wp_972, Levy Economics Institute.
    15. Lambert, Thomas & Velardo, Tristan, 2019. "Schumpeter, the Banking System, and Innovation: Small versus Big Business," MPRA Paper 97742, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Patricio Osorio-Vega, 2019. "The Ethics of Entrepreneurial Shared Value," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 157(4), pages 981-995, July.
    17. Khurshid, Hamid & Snell, Robin Stanley, 2021. "Examining mechanisms for creating shared value by Asian firms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 122-133.
    18. Annie Tubadji & Peter Nijkamp, 2015. "Cultural impact on regional development: application of a PLS-PM model to Greece," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 54(3), pages 687-720, May.
    19. Mayshar, Joram & Moav, Omer & Neeman, Zvika, 2011. "Transparency, Appropriability and the Early State," CEPR Discussion Papers 8548, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    20. Md. Rabiul Islam & Syed Zabid Hossain, 2019. "Conceptual mapping of shared value creation by the private commercial banks in Bangladesh," Asian Journal of Sustainability and Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 1-20, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:7:p:5696-:d:1106292. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.