IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i5p4395-d1084627.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Efficiency of Value-at-Risk Models during Extreme Market Stress in Cryptocurrencies

Author

Listed:
  • Danai Likitratcharoen

    (Chiang Mai University Business School, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand)

  • Pan Chudasring

    (Excellence Center in Infrastructure Technology and Transportation Engineering (ExCITE), Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand)

  • Chakrin Pinmanee

    (Excellence Center in Infrastructure Technology and Transportation Engineering (ExCITE), Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand)

  • Karawan Wiwattanalamphong

    (Excellence Center in Infrastructure Technology and Transportation Engineering (ExCITE), Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand)

Abstract

In recent years, the cryptocurrency market has been experiencing extreme market stress due to unexpected extreme events such as the COVID-19 pandemic, the Russia and Ukraine war, monetary policy uncertainty, and a collapse in the speculative bubble of the cryptocurrencies market. These events cause cryptocurrencies to exhibit higher market risk. As a result, a risk model can lose its accuracy according to the rapid changes in risk levels. Value-at-risk (VaR) is a widely used risk measurement tool that can be applied to various types of assets. In this study, the efficacy of three value-at-risk (VaR) models—namely, Historical Simulation VaR, Delta Normal VaR, and Monte Carlo Simulation VaR—in predicting market stress in the cryptocurrency market was examined. The sample consisted of popular cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin (BTC), Ethereum (ETH), Binance Coin (BNB), Cardano (ADA), and Ripple (XRP). Backtesting was performed using Kupiec’s POF test, Kupiec’s TUFF test, Independence test, and Christoffersen’s Interval Forecast test. The results indicate that the Historical Simulation VaR model was the most appropriate model for the cryptocurrency market, as it demonstrated the lowest rejections. Conversely, the Delta Normal VaR and Monte Carlo Simulation VaR models consistently overestimated risk at confidence levels of 95% and 90%, respectively. Despite these results, both models were found to exhibit comparable robustness to the Historical Simulation VaR model.

Suggested Citation

  • Danai Likitratcharoen & Pan Chudasring & Chakrin Pinmanee & Karawan Wiwattanalamphong, 2023. "The Efficiency of Value-at-Risk Models during Extreme Market Stress in Cryptocurrencies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-21, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:5:p:4395-:d:1084627
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/5/4395/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/5/4395/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pavel Ciaian & Miroslava Rajcaniova & d’Artis Kancs, 2016. "The economics of BitCoin price formation," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(19), pages 1799-1815, April.
    2. Karl Oton Rudolf & Samer Ajour El Zein & Nicola Jackman Lansdowne, 2021. "Bitcoin as an Investment and Hedge Alternative. A DCC MGARCH Model Analysis," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-22, August.
    3. Y. Zhang & S. Nadarajah, 2018. "A review of backtesting for value at risk," Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(15), pages 3616-3639, August.
    4. John C. Cox & Jonathan E. Ingersoll Jr. & Stephen A. Ross, 2005. "A Theory Of The Term Structure Of Interest Rates," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Sudipto Bhattacharya & George M Constantinides (ed.), Theory Of Valuation, chapter 5, pages 129-164, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    5. Zhuhua Jiang & Walid Mensi & Seong-Min Yoon, 2023. "Risks in Major Cryptocurrency Markets: Modeling the Dual Long Memory Property and Structural Breaks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-15, January.
    6. Ludovico Rella, 2020. "Steps towards an ecology of money infrastructures: materiality and cultures of Ripple," Journal of Cultural Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(2), pages 236-249, March.
    7. Stefano Ramelli & Alexander F. Wagner, 2020. "Feverish Stock Price Reactions to COVID-19," Swiss Finance Institute Research Paper Series 20-12, Swiss Finance Institute.
    8. Naeem, Muhammad Abubakr & Lucey, Brian M. & Karim, Sitara & Ghafoor, Abdul, 2022. "Do financial volatilities mitigate the risk of cryptocurrency indexes?," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).
    9. José Almeida & Tiago Cruz Gonçalves, 2022. "A Systematic Literature Review of Volatility and Risk Management on Cryptocurrency Investment: A Methodological Point of View," Risks, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-18, May.
    10. Stanis{l}aw Dro.zd.z & Jaros{l}aw Kwapie'n & Pawe{l} O'swik{e}cimka & Tomasz Stanisz & Marcin Wk{a}torek, 2020. "Complexity in economic and social systems: cryptocurrency market at around COVID-19," Papers 2009.10030, arXiv.org.
    11. Mnif, Emna & Jarboui, Anis & Mouakhar, Khaireddine, 2020. "How the cryptocurrency market has performed during COVID 19? A multifractal analysis," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 36(C).
    12. Oksana A. Karpenko & Tatiana K. Blokhina & Lali V. Chebukhanova, 2021. "The Initial Coin Offering (ICO) Process: Regulation and Risks," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-7, December.
    13. Beneki, Christina & Koulis, Alexandros & Kyriazis, Nikolaos A. & Papadamou, Stephanos, 2019. "Investigating volatility transmission and hedging properties between Bitcoin and Ethereum," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 219-227.
    14. Ozili, Peterson & Arun, Thankom, 2020. "Spillover of COVID-19: Impact on the Global Economy," MPRA Paper 99317, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Sofiane Aboura, 2022. "A note on the Bitcoin and Fed Funds rate," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 63(5), pages 2577-2603, November.
    16. Andrew Burnie, 2018. "Exploring the Interconnectedness of Cryptocurrencies using Correlation Networks," Papers 1806.06632, arXiv.org.
    17. Sanel HALILBEGOVIC & Nedim CELEBIC & Adisa ARAPOVIC & Mia VEHABOVIC, 2019. "Back-Testing the Effectiveness of Value at Risk Model," Romanian Journal of Economics, Institute of National Economy, vol. 48(1(57)), pages 05-33, June.
    18. Ozkan Haykir & Ibrahim Yagli, 2022. "Speculative bubbles and herding in cryptocurrencies," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 8(1), pages 1-33, December.
    19. Mazur, Mieszko & Dang, Man & Vega, Miguel, 2021. "COVID-19 and the march 2020 stock market crash. Evidence from S&P1500," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 38(C).
    20. Arianna Agosto & Alessia Cafferata, 2020. "Financial Bubbles: A Study of Co-Explosivity in the Cryptocurrency Market," Risks, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-14, April.
    21. Wagner, Alexander F. & Ramelli, Stefano, 2020. "Feverish Stock Price Reactions to COVID-19," CEPR Discussion Papers 14511, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    22. Iqbal, Najaf & Fareed, Zeeshan & Wan, Guangcai & Shahzad, Farrukh, 2021. "Asymmetric nexus between COVID-19 outbreak in the world and cryptocurrency market," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    23. Cheng, Hui-Pei & Yen, Kuang-Chieh, 2020. "The relationship between the economic policy uncertainty and the cryptocurrency market," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 35(C).
    24. Danai Likitratcharoen & Nopadon Kronprasert & Karawan Wiwattanalamphong & Chakrin Pinmanee, 2021. "The Accuracy of Risk Measurement Models on Bitcoin Market during COVID-19 Pandemic," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-16, December.
    25. Stefano Ramelli & Alexander F Wagner, 2020. "Feverish Stock Price Reactions to COVID-19," The Review of Corporate Finance Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 9(3), pages 622-655.
    26. Heston, Steven L, 1993. "A Closed-Form Solution for Options with Stochastic Volatility with Applications to Bond and Currency Options," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 6(2), pages 327-343.
    27. Khalfaoui, Rabeh & Gozgor, Giray & Goodell, John W., 2023. "Impact of Russia-Ukraine war attention on cryptocurrency: Evidence from quantile dependence analysis," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    28. Conlon, Thomas & McGee, Richard, 2020. "Safe haven or risky hazard? Bitcoin during the Covid-19 bear market," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 35(C).
    29. Nguyen, Thai Vu Hong & Nguyen, Binh Thanh & Nguyen, Kien Son & Pham, Huy, 2019. "Asymmetric monetary policy effects on cryptocurrency markets," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 335-339.
    30. Pritsker, Matthew, 2006. "The hidden dangers of historical simulation," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 561-582, February.
    31. Darko Vukovic & Moinak Maiti & Zoran Grubisic & Elena M. Grigorieva & Michael Frömmel, 2021. "COVID-19 Pandemic: Is the Crypto Market a Safe Haven? The Impact of the First Wave," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-17, July.
    32. Okorie, David Iheke & Lin, Boqiang, 2021. "Stock markets and the COVID-19 fractal contagion effects," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 38(C).
    33. Cheah, Eng-Tuck & Fry, John, 2015. "Speculative bubbles in Bitcoin markets? An empirical investigation into the fundamental value of Bitcoin," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 32-36.
    34. Joseph J. French, 2021. "#Bitcoin, #COVID-19: Twitter-Based Uncertainty and Bitcoin Before and during the Pandemic," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-7, May.
    35. Rainer Alt, 2020. "Electronic Markets on blockchain markets," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 30(2), pages 181-188, June.
    36. Fang, Tong & Su, Zhi & Yin, Libo, 2020. "Economic fundamentals or investor perceptions? The role of uncertainty in predicting long-term cryptocurrency volatility," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    37. Inzamam Ul Haq & Apichit Maneengam & Supat Chupradit & Wanich Suksatan & Chunhui Huo, 2021. "Economic Policy Uncertainty and Cryptocurrency Market as a Risk Management Avenue: A Systematic Review," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-24, September.
    38. Saliha Theiri & Ramzi Nekhili & Jahangir Sultan, 2022. "Cryptocurrency liquidity during the Russia–Ukraine war: the case of Bitcoin and Ethereum," Journal of Risk Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 24(1), pages 59-71, October.
    39. Conlon, Thomas & Corbet, Shaen & McGee, Richard J., 2020. "Are cryptocurrencies a safe haven for equity markets? An international perspective from the COVID-19 pandemic," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    40. Lahmiri, Salim & Bekiros, Stelios, 2020. "The impact of COVID-19 pandemic upon stability and sequential irregularity of equity and cryptocurrency markets," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    41. Isaac Appiah-Otoo, 2023. "The Impact of the Russia-Ukraine War on the Cryptocurrency Market," Asian Economics Letters, Asia-Pacific Applied Economics Association, vol. 4(1), pages 1-5.
    42. Richard K. Lyons & Ganesh Viswanath-Natraj, 2020. "What Keeps Stablecoins Stable?," NBER Working Papers 27136, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    43. Yukun Liu & Aleh Tsyvinski, 2021. "Risks and Returns of Cryptocurrency," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 34(6), pages 2689-2727.
    44. Hull, John C & White, Alan D, 1987. "The Pricing of Options on Assets with Stochastic Volatilities," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 42(2), pages 281-300, June.
    45. Baur, Dirk G. & Hong, KiHoon & Lee, Adrian D., 2018. "Bitcoin: Medium of exchange or speculative assets?," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 177-189.
    46. Yianni Doumenis & Javad Izadi & Pradeep Dhamdhere & Epameinondas Katsikas & Dimitrios Koufopoulos, 2021. "A Critical Analysis of Volatility Surprise in Bitcoin Cryptocurrency and Other Financial Assets," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-15, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ştefan Cristian Gherghina & Liliana Nicoleta Simionescu, 2023. "Exploring the asymmetric effect of COVID-19 pandemic news on the cryptocurrency market: evidence from nonlinear autoregressive distributed lag approach and frequency domain causality," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 9(1), pages 1-58, December.
    2. Danai Likitratcharoen & Nopadon Kronprasert & Karawan Wiwattanalamphong & Chakrin Pinmanee, 2021. "The Accuracy of Risk Measurement Models on Bitcoin Market during COVID-19 Pandemic," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-16, December.
    3. Yarovaya, Larisa & Brzeszczyński, Janusz & Goodell, John W. & Lucey, Brian & Lau, Chi Keung Marco, 2022. "Rethinking financial contagion: Information transmission mechanism during the COVID-19 pandemic," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    4. Yashraj Varma & Renuka Venkataramani & Parthajit Kayal & Moinak Maiti, 2021. "Short-Term Impact of COVID-19 on Indian Stock Market," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-15, November.
    5. Bampinas, Georgios & Panagiotidis, Theodore, 2023. "How would the war and the pandemic affect the stock and cryptocurrency cross-market linkages?," MPRA Paper 117094, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Aharon, David Y. & Siev, Smadar, 2021. "COVID-19, government interventions and emerging capital markets performance," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    7. Jaros{l}aw Kwapie'n & Marcin Wk{a}torek & Stanis{l}aw Dro.zd.z, 2021. "Cryptocurrency Market Consolidation in 2020--2021," Papers 2112.06552, arXiv.org.
    8. Balcilar, Mehmet & Ozdemir, Huseyin & Agan, Busra, 2022. "Effects of COVID-19 on cryptocurrency and emerging market connectedness: Empirical evidence from quantile, frequency, and lasso networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 604(C).
    9. Yue, Yao & Li, Xuerong & Zhang, Dingxuan & Wang, Shouyang, 2021. "How cryptocurrency affects economy? A network analysis using bibliometric methods," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    10. Ahmed, Walid M.A., 2022. "Robust drivers of Bitcoin price movements: An extreme bounds analysis," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    11. Hasan, Md. Bokhtiar & Mahi, Masnun & Hassan, M. Kabir & Bhuiyan, Abul Bashar, 2021. "Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on stock markets: Conventional vs. Islamic indices using wavelet-based multi-timescales analysis," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    12. amri amamou, souhir, 2021. "Cryptocurrencies responses to the Covid-19 waves," MPRA Paper 110843, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Salisu, Afees & Ogbonna, Ahamuefula & Oloko, Tirimisiyu, 2020. "Pandemics and cryptocurrencies," MPRA Paper 109597, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Assaf, Ata & Charif, Husni & Demir, Ender, 2022. "Information sharing among cryptocurrencies: Evidence from mutual information and approximate entropy during COVID-19," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 47(PA).
    15. Zhifeng Liu & Toan Luu Duc Huynh & Peng-Fei Dai, 2020. "The impact of COVID-19 on the stock market crash risk in China," Papers 2009.08030, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2021.
    16. Bildirici, Melike E. & Sonustun, Bahri, 2021. "Chaotic behavior in gold, silver, copper and bitcoin prices," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    17. Parthajit Kayal & Purnima Rohilla, 2021. "Bitcoin in the economics and finance literature: a survey," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 1(7), pages 1-21, July.
    18. Jiang, Yonghong & Wu, Lanxin & Tian, Gengyu & Nie, He, 2021. "Do cryptocurrencies hedge against EPU and the equity market volatility during COVID-19? – New evidence from quantile coherency analysis," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    19. Serdar Neslihanoglu, 2021. "Linearity extensions of the market model: a case of the top 10 cryptocurrency prices during the pre-COVID-19 and COVID-19 periods," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 7(1), pages 1-27, December.
    20. Demir, Ender & Danisman, Gamze Ozturk, 2021. "Banking sector reactions to COVID-19: The role of bank-specific factors and government policy responses," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:5:p:4395-:d:1084627. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.