IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i5p4305-d1083168.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of Sustainable Reverse Logistic Provider Using the Fuzzy TOPSIS and MSGP Framework in Food Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Yu-Lan Wang

    (College of Teacher Education, Weifang University of Science and Technology, Shouguang 262799, China)

  • Chin-Nung Liao

    (Economics Management College, Weifang University of Science and Technology, Shouguang 262799, China
    Department of Business Administration, China University of Science and Technology, Taipei 11581, Taiwan)

Abstract

As consumers become ever more conscious of environmental issues, socially responsible corporate practices, and government regulations, companies are increasingly motivated to incorporate reverse logistics (RLs) into their operations, thus raising the question of provider selection. In previous studies, the food industry generally lacked a systematic reference method for RLs provider selection, especially during the post-COVID-19 pandemic. This study aims to develop a comprehensive approach that combines a technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) and multi-segment goal programming (MSGP) models to select optimal RLs providers. Furthermore, this method will enable decision makers (DMs) to evaluate and select the best RLs provider considering the limited resources of the business. This approach allows DMs to consider both qualitative and quantitative criteria, set multiple target segmentation expectations, and achieve optimal RLs provider selection. This study also provides case studies of applications by food manufacturers. The main finding is that considering multiple criteria in making a decision produces better results than using a single criterion.

Suggested Citation

  • Yu-Lan Wang & Chin-Nung Liao, 2023. "Assessment of Sustainable Reverse Logistic Provider Using the Fuzzy TOPSIS and MSGP Framework in Food Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-17, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:5:p:4305-:d:1083168
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/5/4305/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/5/4305/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fatih Ecer, 2022. "Multi-criteria decision making for green supplier selection using interval type-2 fuzzy AHP: a case study of a home appliance manufacturer," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 199-233, March.
    2. Govindan, Kannan & Kadziński, Miłosz & Ehling, Ronja & Miebs, Grzegorz, 2019. "Selection of a sustainable third-party reverse logistics provider based on the robustness analysis of an outranking graph kernel conducted with ELECTRE I and SMAA," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 1-15.
    3. Aguezzoul, Aicha, 2014. "Third-party logistics selection problem: A literature review on criteria and methods," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 69-78.
    4. Maria-Lizbeth Uriarte-Miranda & Santiago-Omar Caballero-Morales & Jose-Luis Martinez-Flores & Patricia Cano-Olivos & Anastasia-Alexandrovna Akulova, 2018. "Reverse Logistic Strategy for the Management of Tire Waste in Mexico and Russia: Review and Conceptual Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-25, September.
    5. Kuen-Suan Chen & Feng-Chia Li & Kuei-Kuei Lai & Jung-Mao Lin, 2022. "Green Outsourcer Selection Model Based on Confidence Interval of PCI for SMT Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-12, December.
    6. Ahmed Dabees & Mahmoud Barakat & Sahar Sobhy Elbarky & Andrej Lisec, 2023. "A Framework for Adopting a Sustainable Reverse Logistics Service Quality for Reverse Logistics Service Providers: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-16, January.
    7. Hsin Kao & Dragan PamuÄ ar, 2022. "Integrated Fuzzy-MSGP Methods for Clothing and Textiles Supplier Evaluation and Selection in the COVID-19 Era," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2022, pages 1-13, July.
    8. Chukwuebuka M. U-Dominic & Ifeyinwa Juliet Orji & Modestus Okwu, 2021. "Analyzing the Barriers to Reverse Logistics (RL) Implementation: A Hybrid Model Based on IF-DEMATEL-EDAS," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-24, September.
    9. Imane Tronnebati & Manal El Yadari & Fouad Jawab, 2022. "A Review of Green Supplier Evaluation and Selection Issues Using MCDM, MP and AI Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-22, December.
    10. Changjoon Lee & Byoung-Chun Ha, 2021. "Interactional Justice, Informational Quality, and Sustainable Supply Chain Management: A Comparison of Domestic and Multinational Pharmaceutical Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-16, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yan Pan & Yanzhe Li & Shouzhen Zeng & Junfang Hu & Kifayat Ullah, 2022. "Green Recycling Supplier Selection of Shared Bicycles: Interval-Valued Pythagorean Fuzzy Hybrid Weighted Methods Based on Self-Confidence Level," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-21, April.
    2. Samin Yaser Anon & Saman Hassanzadeh Amin & Fazle Baki, 2024. "Third-Party Reverse Logistics Selection: A Literature Review," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-14, April.
    3. Mehdi Keshavarz-Ghorabaee, 2023. "Sustainable Supplier Selection and Order Allocation Using an Integrated ROG-Based Type-2 Fuzzy Decision-Making Approach," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-33, April.
    4. Chia-Nan Wang & Ngoc-Ai-Thy Nguyen & Thanh-Tuan Dang & Chen-Ming Lu, 2021. "A Compromised Decision-Making Approach to Third-Party Logistics Selection in Sustainable Supply Chain Using Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy VIKOR Methods," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-27, April.
    5. Gu, Wei & Yu, Xiaoru & Zhang, Shichen & Yan, Xiangbin & Wang, Chen, 2023. "To outsource or not: Bike-share rebalancing strategies under the service quality deviation of a third party," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 310(2), pages 847-859.
    6. Woo Jin Lee & Inho Hwang, 2021. "Sustainable Information Security Behavior Management: An Empirical Approach for the Causes of Employees’ Voice Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-23, May.
    7. Jania Astrid Saucedo Martinez & Abraham Mendoza & Maria del Rosario Alvarado Vazquez, 2019. "Collection of Solid Waste in Municipal Areas: Urban Logistics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-15, October.
    8. Aleksandar Aleksić & Danijela Tadić, 2023. "Industrial and Management Applications of Type-2 Multi-Attribute Decision-Making Techniques Extended with Type-2 Fuzzy Sets from 2013 to 2022," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-24, May.
    9. Raut, Rakesh D. & Gardas, Bhaskar B. & Narwane, Vaibhav S. & Narkhede, Balkrishna E., 2019. "Improvement in the food losses in fruits and vegetable supply chain - a perspective of cold third-party logistics approach," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 6(C).
    10. Mengdi Zhang & George Q. Huang & Su Xiu Xu & Zhiheng Zhao, 2019. "Optimization based transportation service trading in B2B e-commerce logistics," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 30(7), pages 2603-2619, October.
    11. Gemechu Abdissa & Abebe Ayalew & Anna Dunay & Csaba Bálint Illés, 2022. "Role of Reverse Logistics Activities in the Recycling of Used Plastic Bottled Water Waste Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-20, June.
    12. Yuan, Yang & Chu, Zhaofang & Lai, Fujun & Wu, Hao, 2020. "The impact of transaction attributes on logistics outsourcing success: A moderated mediation model," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 219(C), pages 54-65.
    13. Farheen Naz & Rohit Agrawal & Anil Kumar & Angappa Gunasekaran & Abhijit Majumdar & Sunil Luthra, 2022. "Reviewing the applications of artificial intelligence in sustainable supply chains: Exploring research propositions for future directions," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 2400-2423, July.
    14. Jung-Fa Tsai & Shih-Ping Shen & Ming-Hua Lin, 2023. "Applying a Hybrid MCDM Model to Evaluate Green Supply Chain Management Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-18, January.
    15. Vitor William Batista Martins & Denilson Ricardo de Lucena Nunes & André Cristiano Silva Melo & Rayra Brandão & Antônio Erlindo Braga Júnior & Verônica de Menezes Nascimento Nagata, 2022. "Analysis of the Activities That Make Up the Reverse Logistics Processes and Their Importance for the Future of Logistics Networks: An Exploratory Study Using the TOPSIS Technique," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-17, August.
    16. Babak Daneshvar Rouyendegh & Kazim Topuz & Ali Dag & Asil Oztekin, 2019. "An AHP-IFT Integrated Model for Performance Evaluation of E-Commerce Web Sites," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 21(6), pages 1345-1355, December.
    17. Arunodaya Raj Mishra & Pratibha Rani & Raghunathan Krishankumar & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Fausto Cavallaro & Kattur S. Ravichandran, 2021. "A Hesitant Fuzzy Combined Compromise Solution Framework-Based on Discrimination Measure for Ranking Sustainable Third-Party Reverse Logistic Providers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-24, February.
    18. Sanja Puzović & Jasmina Vesić Vasović & Dragan D. Milanović & Vladan Paunović, 2023. "A Hybrid Fuzzy MCDM Approach to Open Innovation Partner Evaluation," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-26, July.
    19. Mohamed Abdel-Basset & Abduallah Gamal & Mohamed Elhoseny & Ripon K. Chakrabortty & Michael Ryan, 2021. "A Conceptual Hybrid Approach from a Multicriteria Perspective for Sustainable Third-Party Reverse Logistics Provider Identification," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-29, April.
    20. Zu-Jun, Ma & Zhang, Nian & Dai, Ying & Hu, Shu, 2016. "Managing channel profits of different cooperative models in closed-loop supply chains," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 59(PB), pages 251-262.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:5:p:4305-:d:1083168. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.