IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i2p1058-d1027035.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Joint Impacts of Pricing Strategies and Persuasive Information on Habitual Automobile Commuters’ Travel Mode Shift Responses

Author

Listed:
  • Yaping Li

    (School of Management Engineering, Zhengzhou University of Aeronautics, Zhengzhou 450046, China)

  • Zheng Liu

    (School of Management Engineering, Zhengzhou University of Aeronautics, Zhengzhou 450046, China)

  • Shiqing Zhang

    (School of Management Engineering, Zhengzhou University of Aeronautics, Zhengzhou 450046, China)

Abstract

Persuasive information developed by smartphone applications is a potential tool that can be utilized in order to increase the effectiveness of the impact of pricing strategies on triggering sustainable travel mode choice behavior. In order to address the joint impacts of pricing strategies and persuasive information on habitual automobile commuters’ travel mode shift responses, a stated-preference survey was conducted in Beijing’s inner district, from which over 1000 responses were collected. Four separate multivariable multilevel logistic regression models were estimated for more and less habitual automobile commuters when subjected to congestion pricing and reward strategies. The model estimation results showed that the influence of persuasive information was more effective in promoting travel mode shifts among more habitual automobile commuters with regard to reward strategies compared to congestion pricing. The results also showed that the impact of sociodemographic characteristics, commuter travel characteristics, the amount of congestion pricing or monetary award, and types of persuasive information on travel mode shift decisions under these strategies were deemed to be significantly different between more and less habitual automobile commuters. These findings suggest that more effective reward strategies can be explored by providing personalized and differentiated travel feedback information (e.g., pollution emission information and physical activity information), particularly for less habitual automobile commuters. This study also provides some degree of insight regarding the question as to how to design future congestion pricing, i.e., with respect to formulating differentiated charge rates according to the travel characteristics of habitual automobile commuters, as well as in developing complementary persuasive information that focuses on addressing public acceptability and fairness rather than travel feedback information.

Suggested Citation

  • Yaping Li & Zheng Liu & Shiqing Zhang, 2023. "Joint Impacts of Pricing Strategies and Persuasive Information on Habitual Automobile Commuters’ Travel Mode Shift Responses," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-19, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:2:p:1058-:d:1027035
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/2/1058/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/2/1058/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vonk Noordegraaf, Diana & Annema, Jan Anne & van Wee, Bert, 2014. "Policy implementation lessons from six road pricing cases," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 172-191.
    2. Viegas, José M., 2001. "Making urban road pricing acceptable and effective: searching for quality and equity in urban mobility," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 8(4), pages 289-294, October.
    3. Cipriani, Ernesto & Mannini, Livia & Montemarani, Barbara & Nigro, Marialisa & Petrelli, Marco, 2019. "Congestion pricing policies: Design and assessment for the city of Rome, Italy," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 127-135.
    4. Li, Yaping & Guo, Yuntao & Lu, Jian & Peeta, Srinivas, 2019. "Impacts of congestion pricing and reward strategies on automobile travelers’ morning commute mode shift decisions," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 72-88.
    5. Chen, Daqiang & Ignatius, Joshua & Sun, Danzhi & Goh, Mark & Zhan, Shalei, 2018. "Impact of congestion pricing schemes on emissions and temporal shift of freight transport," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 77-105.
    6. Adnan, Muhammad & Nahmias Biran, Bat-hen & Baburajan, Vishnu & Basak, Kakali & Ben-Akiva, Moshe, 2020. "Examining impacts of time-based pricing strategies in public transportation: A study of Singapore," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 127-141.
    7. Francke, Angela & Kaniok, Denise, 2013. "Responses to differentiated road pricing schemes," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 25-30.
    8. Li, Tianhao & Chen, Peng & Tian, Ye, 2021. "Personalized incentive-based peak avoidance and drivers’ travel time-savings," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 68-80.
    9. Sen, Suman & Charles, Michael B. & Harrison, Jennifer L., 2022. "Usage-based road pricing and potential equity issues: A study of commuters in South East Queensland, Australia," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 33-43.
    10. Linn, Joshua & Wang, Zhongmin & Xie, Lunyu, 2016. "Who will be affected by a congestion pricing scheme in Beijing?," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 34-40.
    11. Link, Heike, 2015. "Is car drivers’ response to congestion charging schemes based on the correct perception of price signals?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 96-109.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Galit Cohen-Blankshtain & Hillel Bar-Gera & Yoram Shiftan, 2023. "Congestion pricing and positive incentives: conceptual analysis and empirical findings from Israel," Transportation, Springer, vol. 50(2), pages 607-633, April.
    2. Tariq Munir & Hussein Dia & Hadi Ghaderi, 2021. "A Systematic Review of the Role of Road Network Pricing in Shaping Sustainable Cities: Lessons Learned and Opportunities for a Post-Pandemic World," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-20, October.
    3. Krabbenborg, Lizet & van Langevelde-van Bergen, Chris & Molin, Eric, 2021. "Public support for tradable peak credit schemes," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 243-259.
    4. Dogterom, Nico & Ettema, Dick & Dijst, Martin, 2018. "Behavioural effects of a tradable driving credit scheme: Results of an online stated adaptation experiment in the Netherlands," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 52-64.
    5. Cavallaro, Federico & Giaretta, Federico & Nocera, Silvio, 2018. "The potential of road pricing schemes to reduce carbon emissions," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 85-92.
    6. Hsieh, Hsu-Sheng, 2022. "Road pricing acceptability and persuasive communication effectiveness," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 179-191.
    7. Adnan, Muhammad & Nahmias Biran, Bat-hen & Baburajan, Vishnu & Basak, Kakali & Ben-Akiva, Moshe, 2020. "Examining impacts of time-based pricing strategies in public transportation: A study of Singapore," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 127-141.
    8. Rigot-Müller, Patrick, 2018. "Analysing the heavy goods vehicle “écotaxe” in France: Why did a promising idea fail in implementation?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 147-173.
    9. Jean-Philippe Meloche, 2019. "Towards a New Era in Road Pricing? Lessons from the Experience of First Movers," CIRANO Working Papers 2019s-35, CIRANO.
    10. Li, Yaping & Guo, Yuntao & Lu, Jian & Peeta, Srinivas, 2019. "Impacts of congestion pricing and reward strategies on automobile travelers’ morning commute mode shift decisions," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 72-88.
    11. Sen, Suman & Charles, Michael B. & Harrison, Jennifer L., 2022. "Usage-based road pricing and potential equity issues: A study of commuters in South East Queensland, Australia," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 33-43.
    12. Glavic, Drazenko & Milos, Mladenovic & Luttinen, Tapio & Cicevic, Svetlana & Trifunovic, Aleksandar, 2017. "Road to price: User perspectives on road pricing in transition country," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 79-94.
    13. Chen, Fangxi & Yin, Zhiwei & Ye, Yingwei & Sun, Daniel(Jian), 2020. "Taxi hailing choice behavior and economic benefit analysis of emission reduction based on multi-mode travel big data," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 73-84.
    14. Bhardwaj, Chandan & Axsen, Jonn & Kern, Florian & McCollum, David, 2020. "Why have multiple climate policies for light-duty vehicles? Policy mix rationales, interactions and research gaps," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 309-326.
    15. Nihat Can Karabulut & Murat Ozen & Oruc Altintasi, 2024. "Understanding the Determinants of Lane Inefficiency at Fully Actuated Intersections: An Empirical Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-17, January.
    16. Vonk Noordegraaf, Diana & Annema, Jan Anne & van Wee, Bert, 2014. "Policy implementation lessons from six road pricing cases," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 172-191.
    17. Francisco J. Bahamonde-Birke & Juan de Dios Ortúzar, 2015. "Analyzing the Continuity of Attitudinal and Perceptional Indicators in Hybrid Choice Models," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1528, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    18. Mouter, Niek & de Geest, Auke & Doorn, Neelke, 2018. "A values-based approach to energy controversies: Value-sensitive design applied to the Groningen gas controversy in the Netherlands," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 639-648.
    19. Eliasson, Jonas & Mattsson, Lars-Göran, 2006. "Equity effects of congestion pricing: Quantitative methodology and a case study for Stockholm," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 40(7), pages 602-620, August.
    20. Han, Linghui & Zhu, Chengjuan & Wang, David Z.W. & Sun, Huijun & Tan, Zhijia & Meng, Meng, 2019. "Discrete-time dynamic road congestion pricing under stochastic user optimal principle," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 24-36.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:2:p:1058-:d:1027035. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.