IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i21p15389-d1269257.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Walkability Index including Pedestrians’ Perception of Built Environment: The Case Study of Milano Rogoredo Station

Author

Listed:
  • Marco Trolese

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, Via G. La Masa 1, 20156 Milan, Italy)

  • Francesco De Fabiis

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, Via G. La Masa 1, 20156 Milan, Italy)

  • Pierluigi Coppola

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, Via G. La Masa 1, 20156 Milan, Italy)

Abstract

Active modes can play a key role in the transition toward sustainable urban mobility, and transport systems should be designed to support and incentivize them. For instance, walking accessibility to main urban centralities is a factor to pay attention to, as well as the way in which pedestrians perceive the characteristics of the infrastructure and the surrounding environment should also be considered. This study proposes a method for computing a walkability index of the paths for accessing transport nodes (e.g., railway station). The index is based on individuals’ perception of walkable infrastructure features (e.g., kerbside width, presence of urban furniture, greenery, etc.). It allows having a more realistic view of the catchment area of the node and to identify policies for improving pedestrian accessibility. The method has been validated using an ad-hoc survey in the area of the Milano Rogoredo railway station (Italy). The map of the estimated walkability indexes is consistent with the real conditions of the Milano Rogoredo neighbourhood and allows for identifying those areas where walkability can be improved.

Suggested Citation

  • Marco Trolese & Francesco De Fabiis & Pierluigi Coppola, 2023. "A Walkability Index including Pedestrians’ Perception of Built Environment: The Case Study of Milano Rogoredo Station," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-14, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:21:p:15389-:d:1269257
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/21/15389/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/21/15389/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Battista, Geoffrey A. & Manaugh, Kevin, 2018. "Stores and mores: Toward socializing walkability," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 53-60.
    2. Aniss M Mezoued & Quentin Letesson & Vincent Kaufmann, 2022. "Making the slow metropolis by designing walkability: a methodology for the evaluation of public space design and prioritizing pedestrian mobility," Urban Research & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(4), pages 584-603, August.
    3. Barbara B. Brown & Wyatt A. Jensen & Doug Tharp, 2019. "Residents’ expectations for new rail stops: optimistic neighborhood perceptions relate to subsequent transit ridership," Transportation, Springer, vol. 46(1), pages 125-146, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jia Zhao & Wei Su & Jiancheng Luo & Jin Zuo, 2021. "Evaluation and Optimization of Walkability of Children’s School Travel Road for Accessibility and Safety Improvement," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-19, December.
    2. Massingue, Suzanna Allen & Oviedo, Daniel, 2021. "Walkability and the Right to the city: A snapshot critique of pedestrian space in Maputo, Mozambique," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    3. Kim, Jisun & Kim, Dong Ha & Lee, Jihyun & Cheon, Youngseo & Yoo, Seunghyun, 2022. "A scoping review of qualitative geographic information systems in studies addressing health issues," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 314(C).
    4. Yuhan Shao & Xinyu Xu & Like Jiang & Romain Crastes dit Sourd, 2020. "Economic Valuation of the Renewal of Urban Streets: A Choice Experiment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-16, June.
    5. Pablo Alberto Sáinz-Ruiz & Javier Sanz-Valero & Vicente Gea-Caballero & Pedro Melo & Tam H. Nguyen & Juan Daniel Suárez-Máximo & José Ramón Martínez-Riera, 2021. "Dimensions of Community Assets for Health. A Systematised Review and Meta-Synthesis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-20, May.
    6. Tracey Ma & Jinhee Kim & Myron Anthony Godinho & Evelyne de Leeuw & Kathleen Clapham & Conrad Kobel & Rebecca Ivers, 2022. "A Systematic Review with Framework Synthesis of the Ways That Urban Environments Influence Opportunities for Healthy and Sustainable Mobility in Older Age," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-37, October.
    7. Tianyang Ge & Wenjun Hou & Yang Xiao, 2023. "Study on the Regeneration of City Centre Spatial Structure Pedestrianisation Based on Space Syntax: Case Study on 21 City Centres in the UK," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-26, June.
    8. Blitz, Andreas & Lanzendorf, Martin, 2020. "Mobility design as a means of promoting non-motorised travel behaviour? A literature review of concepts and findings on design functions," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    9. Pablo Sáinz-Ruiz & José Ramón Martínez-Riera, 2022. "Community Assets for Health Model and Assessment Scale: A Delphi-Based Analysis and Expert Validation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-19, October.
    10. Otsuka, Noriko & Wittowsky, Dirk & Damerau, Marlene & Gerten, Christian, 2021. "Walkability assessment for urban areas around railway stations along the Rhine-Alpine Corridor," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    11. D'Orso, Gabriele & Migliore, Marco, 2020. "A GIS-based method for evaluating the walkability of a pedestrian environment and prioritised investments," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    12. Diogo Da Fonseca-Soares & Josicleda Domiciano Galvinicio & Sayonara Andrade Eliziário & Angel Fermin Ramos-Ridao, 2022. "A Bibliometric Analysis of the Trends and Characteristics of Railway Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-19, October.
    13. Nilsson, Isabelle & Schuch, Johanna C. & Delmelle, Elizabeth C. & Canales, Kristine L., 2020. "Should I stay or should I go? A survey analysis of neighborhood change and residential mobility concerns around new light rail stations in Charlotte, NC," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    14. Chiara Garau & Alfonso Annunziata & Mauro Coni, 2018. "A Methodological Framework for Assessing Practicability of the Urban Space: The Survey on Conditions of Practicable Environments (SCOPE) Procedure Applied in the Case Study of Cagliari (Italy)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-23, November.
    15. Ezio Micelli & Giulia Giliberto, 2023. "Assessing Quality of Life and Walkability for Urban Regeneration: The Piave Neighbourhood in Mestre-Venice," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-20, December.
    16. Apostolos Papagiannakis & Athena Yiannakou, 2022. "Do Citizens Understand the Benefits of Transit-Oriented Development? Exploring and Modeling Community Perceptions of a Metro Line under Construction in Thessaloniki, Greece," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-22, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:21:p:15389-:d:1269257. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.