IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i17p13018-d1228092.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Embedding Technology Interface and Digital Payment Drivers in the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology 2 Model: Transforming Behavioral Intention to Sustained Intention

Author

Listed:
  • Savita Gupta

    (Thapar Institute of Engineering and Technology, School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Patiala 147004, India)

  • Ravi Kiran

    (Thapar Institute of Engineering and Technology, School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Patiala 147004, India)

  • Rakesh Kumar Sharma

    (Thapar Institute of Engineering and Technology, School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Patiala 147004, India)

Abstract

Purpose: The present study was undertaken with the purpose of embedding Technology Interface drivers and Digital Payment drivers as additional drivers in the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT2) to examine their influence on the Behavioral Intention of online shoppers. Technology Interface drivers include chatbots (CBs) and virtual try-on (VTO) technology. Further, this study also links Behavioral Intention with Sustained Intention to analyze whether it translates into repeated online buying. Research Methods: The study is based on a survey instrument using snowball sampling with data collected from 600 consumers from northern India. The study uses PLS-SEM for gauging the association of UTAUT2 drivers, Technology Interface drivers, and Digital Payment drivers with Behavioral Intention. Findings/Results: The results show a positive and significant association with Behavioral Intention of Technology Interface drivers and Digital Payment drivers as additional drivers to UTAUT2 drivers. UTAUT2 drivers had the highest impact (β: 0.465), followed by Digital Payment and Technology Interface drivers (β: 0.263 and β: 0.211). Further examination suggests a positive impact of Behavioral Intention on Sustained Intention (β: 0.868). The outcomes reflect that the model explained 69.5% of the variation in Behavioral Intention and 75.4% of the variation in Sustained Intention. Implications: The study suggests that Indian managers need to adopt DPM as a support service to make online shopping a worthwhile experience. Technology Interface drivers have a comparatively lower coefficient, indicating that in India, they are yet to reach the optimum level for consumers to adopt them fully. Efforts to transform Behavioral Intention into repeated online buying or Sustained Intention may go a long way in building a strong, committed community of online sellers to assist in enhancing customer experience.

Suggested Citation

  • Savita Gupta & Ravi Kiran & Rakesh Kumar Sharma, 2023. "Embedding Technology Interface and Digital Payment Drivers in the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology 2 Model: Transforming Behavioral Intention to Sustained Intention," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-18, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:17:p:13018-:d:1228092
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/17/13018/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/17/13018/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jadil, Yassine & Rana, Nripendra P. & Dwivedi, Yogesh K., 2021. "A meta-analysis of the UTAUT model in the mobile banking literature: The moderating role of sample size and culture," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 354-372.
    2. Kasilingam, Dharun Lingam, 2020. "Understanding the attitude and intention to use smartphone chatbots for shopping," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    3. Naciye Güliz Uğur & Aykut Hamit Turan, 2018. "RETRACTED ARTICLE: E-learning adoption of academicians: a proposal for an extended model," Behaviour and Information Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(4), pages 393-405, April.
    4. Tzu-Hsin Chu & Cheng-Min Chao & Hsieh-Hsi Liu & Der-Fa Chen, 2022. "Developing an Extended Theory of UTAUT 2 Model to Explore Factors Influencing Taiwanese Consumer Adoption of Intelligent Elevators," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(4), pages 21582440221, December.
    5. Lee Cronbach, 1951. "Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 16(3), pages 297-334, September.
    6. Ramon Palau-Saumell & Santiago Forgas-Coll & Javier Sánchez-García & Emilio Robres, 2019. "User Acceptance of Mobile Apps for Restaurants: An Expanded and Extended UTAUT-2," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-24, February.
    7. Liebrecht, Christine & Tsaousi, Christina & van Hooijdonk, Charlotte, 2021. "Linguistic elements of conversational human voice in online brand communication: Manipulations and perceptions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 124-135.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Meichan & Wang, Rui, 2023. "Chatbots in e-commerce: The effect of chatbot language style on customers’ continuance usage intention and attitude toward brand," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    2. Francisco Liébana-Cabanillas & Francisco Muñoz-Leiva & Sebastián Molinillo & Elena Higueras-Castillo, 2022. "Do biometric payment systems work during the COVID-19 pandemic? Insights from the Spanish users' viewpoint," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 8(1), pages 1-25, December.
    3. Tingting Liu & Zichen Zheng & Zhichao Wen & Shangyun Wu & Yaru Liu & Jing Cao & Zhixiong Weng, 2022. "Factors Influencing Residents’ Behavior in Internet Recycling: From the Perspective of the Adoption of New Technology," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-16, May.
    4. Barrutia, Jose M. & Echebarria, Carmen, 2021. "Effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on public managers’ attitudes toward digital transformation," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    5. Meennapa Rukhiran & Napasorn Phaokla & Paniti Netinant, 2022. "Adoption of Environmental Information Chatbot Services Based on the Internet of Educational Things in Smart Schools: Structural Equation Modeling Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-32, November.
    6. Francisco Liébana-Cabanillas & Nidhi Singh & Zoran Kalinic & Elena Carvajal-Trujillo, 2021. "Examining the determinants of continuance intention to use and the moderating effect of the gender and age of users of NFC mobile payments: a multi-analytical approach," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 133-161, June.
    7. Yoon, Junghyun & Lee, Hee Yong & Dinwoodie, John, 2015. "Competitiveness of container terminal operating companies in South Korea and the industry–university–government network," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 1-14.
    8. Md. Mominur Rahman & Bilkis Akhter, 2021. "The impact of investment in human capital on bank performance: evidence from Bangladesh," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 1-13, December.
    9. Usunier, Jean-Claude, 1998. "Oral pleasure and expatriate satisfaction: an empirical approach," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 7(1), pages 89-110, February.
    10. Abdul Kadar Muhammad Masum & Md Abul Kalam Azad & Loo-See Beh, 2015. "Determinants of Academics' Job Satisfaction: Empirical Evidence from Private Universities in Bangladesh," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(2), pages 1-15, February.
    11. Sharma, Vivek & Bhat, Dada Ab Rouf, 2020. "An empirical study exploring the relationship among human capital innovation, service innovation, competitive advantage and employee productivity in hospitality services," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 9(2), pages 1-14..
    12. Deepak, 2016. "Antecedent Value of Professional Commitment and Job Involvement in Determining Job Satisfaction," Management and Labour Studies, XLRI Jamshedpur, School of Business Management & Human Resources, vol. 41(2), pages 154-164, May.
    13. Abernethy, Margaret A. & Vagnoni, Emidia, 2004. "Power, organization design and managerial behaviour," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 29(3-4), pages 207-225.
    14. Marianela Denegri & María Baeza & Natalia Salinas-Oñate & Verónica Peñaloza & Horacio Miranda & Ligia Orellana, 2014. "Materialism in Pedagogy Students in Chile," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 117(2), pages 505-521, June.
    15. Terason Sid, 2021. "Predicting Sports Facility Revisit Intentions Based on Experience and Mediating Effects of Perceived Value," Polish Journal of Sport and Tourism, Sciendo, vol. 28(3), pages 35-41, September.
    16. Amy Roberts & Gregory S. Ching, 2021. "The Ebb and Flow of Study Abroad: A Comparative Analysis of PRC and International Students in Taiwan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-18, May.
    17. Tomislav Letnik & Katja Hanžič & Giuseppe Luppino & Matej Mencinger, 2022. "Impact of Logistics Trends on Freight Transport Development in Urban Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-18, December.
    18. Zhihui Wang & Liangzhen Nie & Eila Jeronen & Lihua Xu & Meiai Chen, 2023. "Understanding the Environmentally Sustainable Behavior of Chinese University Students as Tourists: An Integrative Framework," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-17, February.
    19. William Kelly & Phillips Cutright & David Hittle, 1976. "Comment on charles F. Hohm’s “social security and fertility: An international perspective”," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 13(4), pages 581-586, November.
    20. Ding, David Xin & Hu, Paul Jen-Hwa & Sheng, Olivia R. Liu, 2011. "e-SELFQUAL: A scale for measuring online self-service quality," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(5), pages 508-515, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:17:p:13018-:d:1228092. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.