IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i17p12687-d1222439.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainable and Secure Transport: Achieving Environmental Impact Reductions by Optimizing Pallet-Package Strength Interactions during Transport

Author

Listed:
  • Saewhan Kim

    (Department of Sustainable Biomaterials, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA)

  • Laszlo Horvath

    (Department of Sustainable Biomaterials, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA)

  • Jennifer D. Russell

    (Department of Sustainable Biomaterials, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA)

  • Jonghun Park

    (Graphic Communications Management at the Creative School, Toronto Metropolitan University, Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada)

Abstract

Increasing quantities of products are being transported across widely distributed supply networks; the sustainability of the packaging used to transport these goods, or unit loads, presents an area of potential concern. The most common type of unit load in the U.S. is wooden pallets supporting various configurations of stacked corrugated boxes. Research into unit load cost optimization revealed that increasing the stiffness of a pallet’s top deck can significantly affect the strength of the assembled, stacked corrugated boxes and provides opportunities to reduce the board grade required for accompanying corrugated boxes. However, there remains a knowledge gap regarding the environmental implications of this type of unit load optimization method. To address this, we conducted a life cycle analysis (LCA) to investigate the environmental implications of optimizing a unit load using this method. The environmental impacts of paired (pallet and box) unit load design scenarios ( n = 108) were investigated using varied wood species, pallet top deck thicknesses, corrugated boxes sizes, corrugated flutes, and board grades. Initial and optimized unit load scenarios ensured that the unit loads offered equivalent performance. LCA results indicate that optimizing the unit load can reduce environmental impacts by up to 23%, with benefits accruing across most impact categories primarily due to the reduction in corrugated material used. Ozone depletion, the exception, was mainly affected by the increase in the amount of required pallet materials. This study provides minimum required conditions as preliminary guidance for determining the usefulness of unit load specific analysis, and a sensitivity analysis confirmed these values remain unchanged even with different transportation distances. Through the unit load optimization method, this study demonstrates that an effective way to reduce the overall environmental impact and cost of transported unit loads involves increasing the stiffness of the top decks and reducing the corrugated board grade.

Suggested Citation

  • Saewhan Kim & Laszlo Horvath & Jennifer D. Russell & Jonghun Park, 2023. "Sustainable and Secure Transport: Achieving Environmental Impact Reductions by Optimizing Pallet-Package Strength Interactions during Transport," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-19, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:17:p:12687-:d:1222439
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/17/12687/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/17/12687/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gaël Raballand & Enrique Aldaz‐Carroll, 2007. "How Do Differing Standards Increase Trade Costs? The Case of Pallets," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(4), pages 685-702, April.
    2. Jonathan Asher Morashti & Youra An & Hyunmi Jang, 2022. "A Systematic Literature Review of Sustainable Packaging in Supply Chain Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-22, April.
    3. Harshwardhan Ketkale & Steven Simske, 2023. "A LifeCycle Analysis and Economic Cost Analysis of Corrugated Cardboard Box Reuse and Recycling in the United States," Resources, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-18, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Boyu Liu & Xiameng Si & Haiyan Kang, 2022. "A Literature Review of Blockchain-Based Applications in Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-24, November.
    2. Hao Zhang & Jiadong Jiang & Liwei Zheng & Xiangzhen Li, 2019. "The interaction between standards development and economic growth of China," International Journal of Quality Innovation, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 1-13, December.
    3. Harshwardhan Ketkale & Steven Simske, 2023. "Demographic Considerations in Incenting Reuse of Corrugated Cardboard Boxes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-23, July.
    4. Hezekiah Agwara & Philip Auerswald & Brian Higginbotham, 2013. "Algorithms and the Changing Frontier," NBER Chapters, in: The Changing Frontier: Rethinking Science and Innovation Policy, pages 371-410, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    5. Shangwen Liu & Shijie Zhou & Hao Guan & Qian-Ming Zhang & Tong Qin & Jiarong Lin, 2023. "Research on Enterprise R&D Strategy of Product-Service Innovation Guided by Quality Preference," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-16, June.
    6. Silvina Santana & Agostinho Ribeiro, 2022. "Traceability Models and Traceability Systems to Accelerate the Transition to a Circular Economy: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-50, May.
    7. Nishant Saravanan & Jessica Olivares-Aguila & Alejandro Vital-Soto, 2022. "Bibliometric and Text Analytics Approaches to Review COVID-19 Impacts on Supply Chains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-33, November.
    8. Carrano, Andres L. & Pazour, Jennifer A. & Roy, Debjit & Thorn, Brian K., 2015. "Selection of pallet management strategies based on carbon emissions impact," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 258-270.
    9. Fabiana Tornese & Maria Grazia Gnoni & Brian K. Thorn & Andres L. Carrano & Jennifer A. Pazour, 2021. "Management and Logistics of Returnable Transport Items: A Review Analysis on the Pallet Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-23, November.
    10. Aldaz-Carroll, Enrique, 2006. "Regional approaches to better standards systems," Policy Research Working Paper Series 3948, The World Bank.
    11. Gilles Pache, 2022. "Who will be the winners of the current changes in retail logistics?," Post-Print hal-03948675, HAL.
    12. Patricia Sourdin & Richard Pomfret, 2012. "Trade Facilitation," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 14596.
    13. Hezekiah Agwara & Philip Auerswald & Brian Higginbotham, 2014. "Algorithms and the Changing Frontier," NBER Working Papers 20039, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    14. Jianwei Ren & Qingqing Zhao & Bo Liu & Chunhua Chen, 2019. "Selection of pallet management strategies from the perspective of supply chain cost with Anylogic software," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(6), pages 1-18, June.
    15. Ray, Charles & Janowiak, John & Michael, Judd & Bachev, Hrabrin, 2007. "Economic and environmental impact assessment of proposed bark-free requirements for wood pallets in international trade," MPRA Paper 99615, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Chris Turner & John Oyekan, 2023. "Manufacturing in the Age of Human-Centric and Sustainable Industry 5.0: Application to Holonic, Flexible, Reconfigurable and Smart Manufacturing Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-29, June.
    17. Roy, Debjit & Carrano, Andres L. & Pazour, Jennifer A. & Gupta, Akash, 2016. "Cost-effective pallet management strategies," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 358-371.
    18. Moritz Wagner & Peter Stanbury & Tabea Dietrich & Johanna Döring & Joachim Ewert & Carlotta Foerster & Maximilian Freund & Matthias Friedel & Claudia Kammann & Mirjam Koch & Tom Owtram & Hans Reiner S, 2023. "Developing a Sustainability Vision for the Global Wine Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-29, July.
    19. J. Luis Guasch & Jean-Louis Racine & Isabel Sánchez & Makhtar Diop, 2007. "Quality Systems and Standards for a Competitive Edge," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 6768, December.
    20. Marco Trost & Thorsten Claus & Frank Herrmann, 2022. "Social Sustainability in Production Planning: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-31, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:17:p:12687-:d:1222439. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.