IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i15p12066-d1212000.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multi-Objective Optimization of the Multimodal Routing Problem Using the Adaptive ε-Constraint Method and Modified TOPSIS with the D-CRITIC Method

Author

Listed:
  • Apichit Maneengam

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering Technology, College of Industrial Technology, King Mongkut’s University of Technology North Bangkok, Wongsawang, Bangsue, Bangkok 10800, Thailand)

Abstract

This paper proposes a multi-criteria decision-making approach for the multimodal routing problem (MRP) of bulk transportation in Thailand to minimize the total cost, transportation time, and total carbon dioxide-equivalent (CO 2 e) emissions simultaneously. The proposed approach has three phases: The first phase is generating all nondominated solutions using Kirlik and Sayin’s adaptive ε-constraint method. In the second phase, the Distance Correlation-based Criteria Importance Through Inter-criteria Correlation (D-CRITIC) method is used to determine the weight of each objective function and assign it to the modified technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (modified TOPSIS) model in next phase. The third phase consists of ranking Pareto solutions obtained from the first phase using the modified TOPSIS. This proposed approach is applied to a real-world problem to enable the selection of the best route for transporting goods from the anchorage area in the Gulf of Thailand to the destination factory throughout a multimodal transportation network in Thailand. The computational results indicate that the proposed approach is superior to the current approach utilizing the ε-constraint method (ECM) regarding the number of Pareto solutions obtained and the proportion of computational time to the number of Pareto solutions obtained. Finally, the proposed method can solve the MRP with three or more objective functions and provide a multimodal route selection approach that is suitable for decision makers to offer a multimodal route to customers in the negotiation process for outsourcing transportation.

Suggested Citation

  • Apichit Maneengam, 2023. "Multi-Objective Optimization of the Multimodal Routing Problem Using the Adaptive ε-Constraint Method and Modified TOPSIS with the D-CRITIC Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-22, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:15:p:12066-:d:1212000
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/15/12066/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/15/12066/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Valentinas Podvezko, 2016. "Integrated Determination of Objective Criteria Weights in MCDM," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(02), pages 267-283, March.
    2. Cencheng Shen & Carey E. Priebe & Joshua T. Vogelstein, 2020. "From Distance Correlation to Multiscale Graph Correlation," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 115(529), pages 280-291, January.
    3. Erfan Babaee Tirkolaee & Alireza Goli & Abbas Mardani, 2023. "A novel two-echelon hierarchical location-allocation-routing optimization for green energy-efficient logistics systems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 324(1), pages 795-823, May.
    4. Yan Sun & Maoxiang Lang & Danzhu Wang, 2016. "Bi-Objective Modelling for Hazardous Materials Road–Rail Multimodal Routing Problem with Railway Schedule-Based Space–Time Constraints," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-31, July.
    5. Laumanns, Marco & Thiele, Lothar & Zitzler, Eckart, 2006. "An efficient, adaptive parameter variation scheme for metaheuristics based on the epsilon-constraint method," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 169(3), pages 932-942, March.
    6. Bashir Bashir & Özlem Karsu, 2022. "Solution approaches for equitable multiobjective integer programming problems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 311(2), pages 967-995, April.
    7. Assadipour, Ghazal & Ke, Ginger Y. & Verma, Manish, 2015. "Planning and managing intermodal transportation of hazardous materials with capacity selection and congestion," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 45-57.
    8. Resat, Hamdi G. & Turkay, Metin, 2015. "Design and operation of intermodal transportation network in the Marmara region of Turkey," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 16-33.
    9. Meenu Singh & Millie Pant, 2021. "A review of selected weighing methods in MCDM with a case study," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 12(1), pages 126-144, February.
    10. Mesquita-Cunha, Mariana & Figueira, José Rui & Barbosa-Póvoa, Ana Paula, 2023. "New ϵ−constraint methods for multi-objective integer linear programming: A Pareto front representation approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 306(1), pages 286-307.
    11. Ma, Jian & Fan, Zhi-Ping & Huang, Li-Hua, 1999. "A subjective and objective integrated approach to determine attribute weights," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 112(2), pages 397-404, January.
    12. Kirlik, Gokhan & Sayın, Serpil, 2014. "A new algorithm for generating all nondominated solutions of multiobjective discrete optimization problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 232(3), pages 479-488.
    13. Rezaei, Jafar, 2015. "Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 49-57.
    14. Baykasoğlu, Adil & Subulan, Kemal, 2016. "A multi-objective sustainable load planning model for intermodal transportation networks with a real-life application," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 207-247.
    15. SteadieSeifi, M. & Dellaert, N.P. & Nuijten, W. & Van Woensel, T. & Raoufi, R., 2014. "Multimodal freight transportation planning: A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 233(1), pages 1-15.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Song, Zhuzhu & Tang, Wansheng & Zhao, Ruiqing, 2020. "A simple game theoretical analysis for incentivizing multi-modal transportation in freight supply chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 283(1), pages 152-165.
    2. Archetti, Claudia & Peirano, Lorenzo & Speranza, M. Grazia, 2022. "Optimization in multimodal freight transportation problems: A Survey," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 299(1), pages 1-20.
    3. Babagolzadeh, Mahla & Zhang, Yahua & Abbasi, Babak & Shrestha, Anup & Zhang, Anming, 2022. "Promoting Australian regional airports with subsidy schemes: Optimised downstream logistics using vehicle routing problem," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 38-51.
    4. Shuxia Li & Yuedan Zu & Huimin Fang & Liping Liu & Tijun Fan, 2021. "Design Optimization of a HAZMAT Multimodal Hub-and-Spoke Network with Detour," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-18, November.
    5. Baykasoğlu, Adil & Subulan, Kemal, 2016. "A multi-objective sustainable load planning model for intermodal transportation networks with a real-life application," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 207-247.
    6. Mei, Qihuang & Li, Jianbin & Ursavas, Evrim & Zhu, Stuart X. & Luo, Xiaomeng, 2021. "Freight transportation planning in platform service supply chain considering carbon emissions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    7. Audrius Čereška & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Fausto Cavallaro & Valentinas Podvezko & Ina Tetsman & Irina Grinbergienė, 2016. "Sustainable Assessment of Aerosol Pollution Decrease Applying Multiple Attribute Decision-Making Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-12, June.
    8. Tobias Kuhn & Stefan Ruzika, 2017. "A coverage-based Box-Algorithm to compute a representation for optimization problems with three objective functions," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 67(3), pages 581-600, March.
    9. Rađenović Žarko & Veselinović Ivana, 2017. "Integrated AHP-TOPSIS Method for the Assessment of Health Management Information Systems Efficiency," Economic Themes, Sciendo, vol. 55(1), pages 121-142, March.
    10. Hilde Heggen & Yves Molenbruch & An Caris & Kris Braekers, 2019. "Intermodal Container Routing: Integrating Long-Haul Routing and Local Drayage Decisions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-36, March.
    11. Zhang, Yimeng & Li, Xinlei & van Hassel, Edwin & Negenborn, Rudy R. & Atasoy, Bilge, 2022. "Synchromodal transport planning considering heterogeneous and vague preferences of shippers," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    12. Mesquita-Cunha, Mariana & Figueira, José Rui & Barbosa-Póvoa, Ana Paula, 2023. "New ϵ−constraint methods for multi-objective integer linear programming: A Pareto front representation approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 306(1), pages 286-307.
    13. Oylum S¸eker & Mucahit Cevik & Merve Bodur & Young Lee & Mark Ruschin, 2023. "A Multiobjective Approach for Sector Duration Optimization in Stereotactic Radiosurgery Treatment Planning," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 35(1), pages 248-264, January.
    14. Klamroth, Kathrin & Lacour, Renaud & Vanderpooten, Daniel, 2015. "On the representation of the search region in multi-objective optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 245(3), pages 767-778.
    15. Zajac, Sandra & Huber, Sandra, 2021. "Objectives and methods in multi-objective routing problems: a survey and classification scheme," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(1), pages 1-25.
    16. Zhang, Zhi-Gang & Hu, Xiao & Liu, Zhao-Ting & Zhao, Lu-Tao, 2021. "Multi-attribute decision making: An innovative method based on the dynamic credibility of experts," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 393(C).
    17. Alaa Alden Al Mohamed & Sobhi Al Mohamed & Moustafa Zino, 2023. "Application of fuzzy multicriteria decision-making model in selecting pandemic hospital site," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 1-22, December.
    18. Volha Yakavenka & Ioannis Mallidis & Dimitrios Vlachos & Eleftherios Iakovou & Zafeiriou Eleni, 2020. "Development of a multi-objective model for the design of sustainable supply chains: the case of perishable food products," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 294(1), pages 593-621, November.
    19. David Bergman & Merve Bodur & Carlos Cardonha & Andre A. Cire, 2022. "Network Models for Multiobjective Discrete Optimization," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(2), pages 990-1005, March.
    20. Dragisa STANUJKIC & Edmundas Kazimieras ZAVADSKAS & Darjan KARABASEVIC & Florentin SMARANDACHE & Zenonas TURSKIS, 2017. "The Use Of The Pivot Pairwise Relative Criteria Importance Assessment Method For Determining The Weights Of Criteria," Journal for Economic Forecasting, Institute for Economic Forecasting, vol. 0(4), pages 116-133, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:15:p:12066-:d:1212000. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.