IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i11p8614-d1155828.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Demolishing or Renovating? Life Cycle Analysis in the Design Process for Building Renovation: The ProGETonE Case

Author

Listed:
  • Marco A. Bragadin

    (Department of Architecture, University of Bologna, 40136 Bologna, Italy)

  • Luca Guardigli

    (Department of Architecture, University of Bologna, 40136 Bologna, Italy)

  • Mattia Calistri

    (Department of Architecture, University of Bologna, 40136 Bologna, Italy)

  • Annarita Ferrante

    (Department of Architecture, University of Bologna, 40136 Bologna, Italy)

Abstract

It is well known that a large part of the existing European building stock needs to be renovated to increase structural and energy performance. Unfortunately, deep renovations come with high initial costs, and therefore, owners and real estate developers often prefer complete demolition and reconstruction. Both options depend on specific factors, and to select which option could be the closest to the optimal scenario, it is necessary to evaluate all environmental, social, and economic indicators. Life Cycle Analysis is of great significance to evaluate building sustainability, in particular through the comparison between different design alternatives. However, the life cycle impacts of the construction stage depend on selected materials and technologies that can be subject to change during the subsequent stages of the design process, i.e., moving from preliminary design to detailed design and execution plans. With the aim of understanding the role of LCA during the design process, the case study of “ProGETonE—Proactive Synergy of Integrated Efficient Technologies on Buildings’ Envelopes” has been addressed, leading to the observation that the impacts, in particular the global warming potential (GWP), raised significantly. Building Information Modelling (BIM) helped the information sharing and management of this project, which consists of the deep renovation and architectural reshaping of an existing student residence through the construction of integrated façade systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Marco A. Bragadin & Luca Guardigli & Mattia Calistri & Annarita Ferrante, 2023. "Demolishing or Renovating? Life Cycle Analysis in the Design Process for Building Renovation: The ProGETonE Case," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-20, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:11:p:8614-:d:1155828
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/11/8614/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/11/8614/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Power, Anne, 2008. "Does demolition or refurbishment of old and inefficient homes help to increase our environmental, social and economic viability?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(12), pages 4487-4501, December.
    2. Thibodeau, Charles & Bataille, Alain & Sié, Marion, 2019. "Building rehabilitation life cycle assessment methodology–state of the art," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 408-422.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shiyao Zhu & Dezhi Li & Haibo Feng & Tiantian Gu & Jiawei Zhu, 2019. "AHP-TOPSIS-Based Evaluation of the Relative Performance of Multiple Neighborhood Renewal Projects: A Case Study in Nanjing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-17, August.
    2. Belotti, Alice, 2016. "Estate regeneration and community impacts: challenges and lessons for social landlords, developers and local councils," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 121480, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    3. Hamza, Neveen & Gilroy, Rose, 2011. "The challenge to UK energy policy: An ageing population perspective on energy saving measures and consumption," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 782-789, February.
    4. Walzberg, Julien & Dandres, Thomas & Merveille, Nicolas & Cheriet, Mohamed & Samson, Réjean, 2020. "Should we fear the rebound effect in smart homes?," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    5. Deakin, Mark & Campbell, Fiona & Reid, Alasdair, 2012. "The mass-retrofitting of an energy efficient-low carbon zone: Baselining the urban regeneration strategy, vision, masterplan and redevelopment scheme," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 187-200.
    6. Egusquiza, A. & Ginestet, S. & Espada, J.C. & Flores-Abascal, I. & Garcia-Gafaro, C. & Giraldo-Soto, C. & Claude, S. & Escadeillas, G., 2021. "Co-creation of local eco-rehabilitation strategies for energy improvement of historic urban areas," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    7. Nessa Winston, 2022. "Sustainable community development: Integrating social and environmental sustainability for sustainable housing and communities," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(1), pages 191-202, February.
    8. Ariadna Reyes, 2021. "Revealing the Contribution of Informal Settlements to Climate Change Mitigation in Latin America: A Case Study of Isidro Fabela, Mexico City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-19, November.
    9. Laura Lane & Anne Power, 2010. "Housing Futures: our homes and communities. A report for the Federation of Master Builders," CASE Reports casereport63, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE.
    10. Michael Crilly & Mark Lemon & Andrew J Wright & Matthew B Cook & David Shaw, 2012. "Retrofitting Homes for Energy Efficiency: An Integrated Approach to Innovation in the Low-Carbon Overhaul of Uk Social Housing," Energy & Environment, , vol. 23(6-7), pages 1027-1055, October.
    11. Schwartz, Yair & Raslan, Rokia & Mumovic, Dejan, 2022. "Refurbish or replace? The Life Cycle Carbon Footprint and Life Cycle Cost of Refurbished and New Residential Archetype Buildings in London," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
    12. Hossein Omrany & Veronica Soebarto & Ehsan Sharifi & Ali Soltani, 2020. "Application of Life Cycle Energy Assessment in Residential Buildings: A Critical Review of Recent Trends," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-30, January.
    13. Power, Anne, 2012. "Social inequality, disadvantaged neighbourhoods and transport deprivation: an assessment of the historical influence of housing policies," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 21(C), pages 39-48.
    14. Kelly D. Edmiston, 2012. "Nonprofit housing investment and local area home values," Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, vol. 97(Q I), pages 67-96.
    15. Copiello, Sergio, 2015. "Achieving affordable housing through energy efficiency strategy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 288-298.
    16. Taozhi Zhuang & Queena K. Qian & Henk J. Visscher & Marja G. Elsinga, 2017. "Stakeholders’ Expectations in Urban Renewal Projects in China: A Key Step towards Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-21, September.
    17. Lina La Fleur & Patrik Rohdin & Bahram Moshfegh, 2019. "Energy Renovation versus Demolition and Construction of a New Building—A Comparative Analysis of a Swedish Multi-Family Building," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-27, June.
    18. Yang Bai & Wei Zhou & Yanjun Guan & Xue Li & Baohua Huang & Fengchun Lei & Hong Yang & Wenmin Huo, 2020. "Evolution of Policy Concerning the Readjustment of Inefficient Urban Land Use in China Based on a Content Analysis Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-21, January.
    19. Wenjing Cui & Jingke Hong & Guiwen Liu & Kaijian Li & Yuanyuan Huang & Lin Zhang, 2021. "Co-Benefits Analysis of Buildings Based on Different Renewal Strategies: The Emergy-Lca Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-22, January.
    20. Power, Anne & Lane, Laura, 2010. "Housing Futures: our homes and communities: a report for the Federation of Master Builders," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 35715, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:11:p:8614-:d:1155828. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.