IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2022i1p233-d1013086.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Physics Students’ Innovation Readiness for Digital Learning within the University 4.0 Model: Essential Scientific and Pedagogical Elements That Cause the Educational Format to Evolve in the Context of Advanced Technology Trends

Author

Listed:
  • Bakytgul Jugembayeva

    (Department of Plasma Physics, Nanotechnology and Computer Physics, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Almaty 050040, Kazakhstan)

  • Aliya Murzagaliyeva

    (Department of Theoretical and Nuclear Physics, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Almaty 050040, Kazakhstan)

Abstract

Students’ readiness for innovative educational formats is a determining factor that can affect the effectiveness of digital transformations in a higher education institution. Evaluation of students’ innovative readiness for the transition to the University 4.0 model can provide guidance on what actions and policies should be taken to achieve an educational institution’s digital transformation goals. This article aims to study the essential scientific and pedagogical elements that cause the educational format to evolve in the context of advanced technology trends and determine physics students’ innovation readiness for digital learning within the University 4.0 model. The survey was extended to the online forum University 4.0: Prospects for Modernising Approaches to Teaching Physics. The survey results showed the degree of readiness of physics students to implement digital approaches in teaching in four dimensions. Students had a high level of creativity and a positive attitude toward innovative educational activities (M = 3.89); they also had a high level of motivation for digital innovative training and sufficient knowledge of how the training will help them achieve their educational goals and professional and personal competence (M = 3.85); and they had a high level of digital literacy (M = 3.96). The scientific value of this article lies in demonstrating the developed methodology for determining and evaluating the degree of innovative readiness of students in the process of transition to a new educational format University 4.0. This methodology can be used in the process of developing an innovative strategy for organizing the educational process in the conditions of Industry 4.0 taking into account its challenges and opportunities.

Suggested Citation

  • Bakytgul Jugembayeva & Aliya Murzagaliyeva, 2022. "Physics Students’ Innovation Readiness for Digital Learning within the University 4.0 Model: Essential Scientific and Pedagogical Elements That Cause the Educational Format to Evolve in the Context of," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-18, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2022:i:1:p:233-:d:1013086
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/1/233/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/1/233/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sumona Mukhuty & Arvind Upadhyay & Holly Rothwell, 2022. "Strategic sustainable development of Industry 4.0 through the lens of social responsibility: The role of human resource practices," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 2068-2081, July.
    2. Tatyana Tolstykh & Leyla Gamidullaeva & Nadezhda Shmeleva, 2021. "Universities as Knowledge Integrators and Cross-Industry Ecosystems: Self-Organizational Perspective," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(1), pages 21582440209, February.
    3. Shaikha R. Al-Nuaimi & Sami G. Al-Ghamdi, 2022. "Sustainable Consumption and Education for Sustainability in Higher Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-17, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gad Degani & Dan Levanon & Gregory Yom Din, 2021. "Academic Research, Higher Education, and Peripheral Development: The Case of Israel," Economies, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-9, August.
    2. Hailan Guo & Ming Dong & Christos Tsinopoulos & Mengyuan Xu, 2024. "The influential capacity of carbon neutrality environmental orientation in modulating stakeholder engagement toward green manufacturing," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(1), pages 292-310, January.
    3. Antonello Cammarano & Vincenzo Varriale & Francesca Michelino & Mauro Caputo, 2023. "Blockchain as enabling factor for implementing RFID and IoT technologies in VMI: a simulation on the Parmigiano Reggiano supply chain," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 726-754, June.
    4. She, Weijun & Mabrouk, Fatma, 2023. "Impact of natural resources and globalization on green economic recovery: Role of FDI and green innovations in BRICS economies," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    5. Mikko Koria & Roberto Osorno-Hinojosa & Delia del Carmen Ramírez-Vázquez & Antonius van den Broek, 2022. "One World, Two Ideas and Three Adaptations: Innovation Intermediaries Enabling Sustainable Open Innovation in University–Industry Collaboration in Finland, Mexico and Nicaragua," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-18, September.
    6. Karen Castañeda & Omar Sánchez & Rodrigo F. Herrera & Guillermo Mejía, 2022. "Highway Planning Trends: A Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-33, May.
    7. Hongfeng Zhang & Shaodan Su & Yan Liu, 2023. "Higher Education Talents Strategy in the Context of Regional Talent Hub Construction: Textual Analysis and Endosymbiotic Cooperation Model," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(1), pages 21582440231, February.
    8. Wu, Xuepin & Ma, Yongjun, 2023. "Research on the comparison effect of urban residents' consumption," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    9. Maheshwari, Pratik & Kamble, Sachin & Belhadi, Amine & Venkatesh, Mani & Abedin, Mohammad Zoynul, 2023. "Digital twin-driven real-time planning, monitoring, and controlling in food supply chains," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    10. Federica Acerbi & Claudio Sassanelli & Marco Taisch, 2022. "A conceptual data model promoting data-driven circular manufacturing," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 838-857, December.
    11. Junjie Li & Xuehang Sun & Xin Dai & Junying Zhang & Bangfan Liu, 2022. "Knowledge Map Analysis of Industry–University Research Cooperation Policy Research Based on CNKI and WOS Visualization in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-26, June.
    12. Shaikha R. Al-Nuaimi & Sami G. Al-Ghamdi, 2022. "Assessment of Knowledge, Attitude and Practice towards Sustainability Aspects among Higher Education Students in Qatar," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-17, October.
    13. Ortiz-Barrios, Miguel & Arias-Fonseca, Sebastián & Ishizaka, Alessio & Barbati, Maria & Avendaño-Collante, Betty & Navarro-Jiménez, Eduardo, 2023. "Artificial intelligence and discrete-event simulation for capacity management of intensive care units during the Covid-19 pandemic: A case study," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    14. Luai Jraisat & Mohannad Jreissat & Arvind Upadhyay & Farhana Sajjad & Krishna Chandra Balodi, 2022. "Paradox of strategic partnerships for sustainable value chains: Perspectives of not‐for‐profit actors," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(7), pages 3491-3508, November.
    15. Zakaria Elkhwesky, 2022. "A systematic and major review of proactive environmental strategies in hospitality and tourism: Looking back for moving forward," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(7), pages 3274-3301, November.
    16. de la Torre de Palacios, Luis & Espí Rodríguez, José Antonio, 2022. "In mining, not everything is a circular economy: Case studies from recent mining projects in Iberia," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    17. Leyla Gamidullaeva & Sergey Vasin & Tatyana Tolstykh & Svetlana Zinchenko, 2022. "Approach to Regional Tourism Potential Assessment in View of Cross-Sectoral Ecosystem Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-24, November.
    18. Harman Preet Singh & Ajay Singh & Fakhre Alam & Vikas Agrawal, 2022. "Impact of Sustainable Development Goals on Economic Growth in Saudi Arabia: Role of Education and Training," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-25, October.
    19. Ángel Acevedo-Duque & Tohtli Prado-Sabido & Elizabeth Emperatriz García-Salirrosas & Mirtha Mercedes Fernández Mantilla & Velia Graciela Vera Calmet & Nicolás Valle Palomino & Haydee Mercedes Aguilar , 2022. "Postgraduate Trends in the Training of Human Talent for Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-18, November.
    20. Rimalini Gadekar & Bijan Sarkar & Ashish Gadekar, 2022. "Key performance indicator based dynamic decision-making framework for sustainable Industry 4.0 implementation risks evaluation: reference to the Indian manufacturing industries," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 318(1), pages 189-249, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2022:i:1:p:233-:d:1013086. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.