IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2022i1p124-d1010772.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Practical Applications of Target Costing in a Multidisciplinary R&D Project

Author

Listed:
  • Dorota Kostrzewa-Nowak

    (Department of Clinical and Molecular Biochemistry, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, 72 Powstańców Wlkp. Al., 70-111 Szczecin, Poland
    Institute of Physical Culture Sciences, University of Szczecin, 17C Narutowicza St., 70-240 Szczecin, Poland)

  • Waldemar Gos

    (Institute of Economics and Finance, University of Szczecin, 64 Mickiewicza St., 71-101 Szczecin, Poland)

Abstract

R&D requires expertise in the basic sciences, technical and technological knowledge, legal regulations and business, it seems necessary to enhance collaboration between researchers and businesses, especially small and medium-sized enterprises. In this paper, we present a case study of a collaboration between a university and a company in the implementation of R&D projects. The primary research methods used in this study comprised literature analysis, case study analysis, participant observation, direct observation, deductive reasoning, and the authors’ experience with prototype interview design, including telephone interviews (quantitative survey) and interviews with market experts and/or individuals responsible for specific processes in diagnostic and testing laboratories. The calculations presented for studied projects showed a large disproportion between the costs incurred for the production of prototypes and the selling price accepted by the market. However, this does not preclude profitability. Further analysis of the technological processes, materials, components, etc. should be carried out in order to point out the optimization measures and consequently to achieve the target profitability of the product. Conducting R&D works should take into account the task of commercialization. The use of the concept of target costing facilitates the initial assessment of project profitability and should be recommended when conducting R&D, especially at higher stages of technological readiness of the product. Projects involving a higher level of technological readiness should be carried out not only by people representing life sciences, technology, medicine, etc., but also by specialists in social sciences (e.g., accountants and marketing specialists).

Suggested Citation

  • Dorota Kostrzewa-Nowak & Waldemar Gos, 2022. "Practical Applications of Target Costing in a Multidisciplinary R&D Project," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-13, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2022:i:1:p:124-:d:1010772
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/1/124/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/1/124/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ax, Christian & Greve, Jan & Nilsson, Ulf, 2008. "The impact of competition and uncertainty on the adoption of target costing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(1), pages 92-103, September.
    2. Dekker, Henri & Smidt, Peter, 2003. "A survey of the adoption and use of target costing in Dutch firms," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(3), pages 293-305, June.
    3. Armstrong, Peter, 2002. "The costs of activity-based management," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 27(1-2), pages 99-120.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ionica Oncioiu & Sorinel Căpuşneanu & Dan Ioan Topor & Ana Maria Ifrim & Ramona Camelia Silvestru & Monica Ioana Toader, 2021. "Improving Business Processes in a Construction Project and Increasing Performance by Using Target Costing," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(1), pages 21582440219, February.
    2. Odysseas Pavlatos & Hara Kostakis, 2022. "Exploring the Relationship between Target Costing Functionality and Product Innovation: The Role of Information Systems," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 32(1), pages 124-140, March.
    3. Stadtherr, Frank & Wouters, Marc, 2021. "Extending target costing to include targets for R&D costs and production investments for a modular product portfolio—A case study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    4. Ofileanu Dimi & Bumbescu Sorina Simona, 2014. "Target Costing – The Response Of The Managerial Accounting To Changes In The Environment," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 3, pages 45-55, June.
    5. Gopalakrishnan, Mohan & Libby, Theresa & Samuels, Janet A. & Swenson, Dan, 2015. "The effect of cost goal specificity and new product development process on cost reduction performance," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 1-11.
    6. Gonçalves, Tiago & Gaio, Cristina & Silva, Mariana, 2018. "Target costing and innovation-exploratory configurations: A comparison of fsQCA, multivariate regression, and variable cluster analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 378-384.
    7. Karim Abbas, 2015. "Target Costing (Tc) System And Its Uncontrollable Factors: A Case Study From Egypt," Annals of University of Craiova - Economic Sciences Series, University of Craiova, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 2(43), pages 366-374.
    8. Yazdifar, Hassan & Askarany, Davood, 2012. "A comparative study of the adoption and implementation of target costing in the UK, Australia and New Zealand," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(1), pages 382-392.
    9. Ulf Diefenbach & Andreas Wald & Ronald Gleich, 2018. "Between cost and benefit: investigating effects of cost management control systems on cost efficiency and organisational performance," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 63-89, March.
    10. Kee, Robert, 2010. "The sufficiency of target costing for evaluating production-related decisions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(2), pages 204-211, August.
    11. Filomena, Tiago Pascoal & Neto, Francisco Jos Kliemann & Duffey, Michael Robert, 2009. "Target costing operationalization during product development: Model and application," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 118(2), pages 398-409, April.
    12. Olivier de La Villarmois & Yves Levant, 2007. "Le Time-Driven ABC:la simplification de l’évaluation des coûts par le recours aux équivalents–un essai de positionnement," Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie, revues.org, vol. 10(1), pages 149-182, March.
    13. Alcaniz, Leire & Gomez-Bezares, Fernando & Roslender, Robin, 2011. "Theoretical perspectives on intellectual capital: A backward look and a proposal for going forward," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 104-117.
    14. Li, Hongmin & Wang, Yimin & Yin, Rui & Kull, Thomas J. & Choi, Thomas Y., 2012. "Target pricing: Demand-side versus supply-side approaches," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(1), pages 172-184.
    15. Theuvsen, Ludwig & Essmann, Sandra & Brand-Sassen, Henning, 2005. "Livestock Husbandry between Ethics and Economics: Finding a Feasible Way Out by Target Costing?," 2005 International Congress, August 23-27, 2005, Copenhagen, Denmark 24598, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    16. Goretzki, Lukas & Messner, Martin, 2019. "Backstage and frontstage interactions in management accountants' identity work," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 1-20.
    17. Rodney Coyte & Martin Messner & Shan Zhou, 2022. "The revival of zero‐based budgeting: drivers and consequences of firm‐level adoptions," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(3), pages 3147-3188, September.
    18. Violeta DOMANOVIC & Vesna STOJANOVIC-ALEKSIC, 2010. "The Complementariness of the Business Process Reengineering and Activity-Based Management," Scientific Bulletin - Economic Sciences, University of Pitesti, issue 9, pages 123-130.
    19. Agyemang, Gloria & Lehman, Cheryl R., 2013. "Adding critical accounting voices to migration studies," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 24(4), pages 261-272.
    20. Mariana Man & Bogdan Răvaş, 2017. "Implications of Lean Manufacturing on Management Accounting in Romanian Organisations," Annals of the University of Petrosani, Economics, University of Petrosani, Romania, vol. 17(1), pages 155-168.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2022:i:1:p:124-:d:1010772. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.