IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i9p5311-d804214.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Fair Method for Distributing Collective Assets in the Stellar Blockchain Financial Network

Author

Listed:
  • Kiarash Shamsi

    (Department of Computer Engineering, University of Science and Culture, Bahar Str., Shahid Qamushi Str., Ashrafi Esfahani Bulvar, Tehran 1461968151, Iran)

  • Mohammad Javad Shayegan

    (Department of Computer Engineering, University of Science and Culture, Bahar Str., Shahid Qamushi Str., Ashrafi Esfahani Bulvar, Tehran 1461968151, Iran)

  • Mueen Uddin

    (School of Digital Science, Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Jalan Tungku Link, Seri Begawan BE1410, Brunei)

  • Chin-Ling Chen

    (School of Information Engineering, Changchun Sci-Tech University, Changchun 130600, China
    School of Computer and Information Engineering, Xiamen University of Technology, Xiamen 361024, China
    Department of Computer Science and Information Engineering, Chaoyang University of Technology, Taichung 41349, Taiwan)

Abstract

One of the most popular platforms in token-based banking is the flexible Stellar platform. The wide range of Stellar’s features allows companies to use it in modern cryptocurrency and token-based banking. This network charges a fee for each transaction. A percentage of the net amount is generated as the inflation rate of the network due to the increased number of tokens. These fees and inflationary amounts are aggregated into a general account and ultimately distributed among the network members on a collective-vote basis. In this mechanism, network users select an account as the destination to which they wish to transfer assets using their user interface, generally a wallet. This account could be the account of charities that need this help. The target distribution network is then determined based on the voting results of all members. One of the challenges in this network is the targeted and fair distribution of these funds between accounts. In this paper, the first step is a complete infrastructure of a Stellar financial network that will consist of three network-based segments of the core network, an off-chain server, and a wallet interface. In the second step, a context-aware recommendation system is implemented to solve the targeted management of payroll account selection. The results of this study concerning the importance of the targeted division of collective assets show a context-aware recommendation system as a solution to improve the process of Stellar users’ participation in the voting process.

Suggested Citation

  • Kiarash Shamsi & Mohammad Javad Shayegan & Mueen Uddin & Chin-Ling Chen, 2022. "A Fair Method for Distributing Collective Assets in the Stellar Blockchain Financial Network," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-14, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:9:p:5311-:d:804214
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/9/5311/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/9/5311/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ye Guo & Chen Liang, 2016. "Blockchain application and outlook in the banking industry," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 2(1), pages 1-12, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhu Yongjie, 2023. "Enterprise life cycle, financial technology and digital transformation of banks—Evidence from China," Australian Economic Papers, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(3), pages 486-500, September.
    2. Ilya Ivaninskiy & Irina Ivashkovskaya & Joseph A. McCahery, 2023. "Does digitalization mitigate or intensify the principal-agent conflict in a firm?," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 27(3), pages 695-725, September.
    3. Bindu K. Nambiar & Kartikeya Bolar, 2023. "Factors influencing customer preference of cardless technology over the card for cash withdrawals: an extended technology acceptance model," Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 28(1), pages 58-73, March.
    4. Alper Ozpinar, 2023. "A Hyper-Integrated Mobility as a Service (MaaS) to Gamification and Carbon Market Enterprise Architecture Framework for Sustainable Environment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-22, March.
    5. Łukasz Wyciślik & Elżbieta Marcinkowska, 2020. "Tracking of Clinical Documentation Based on the Blockchain Technology—A Polish Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-14, November.
    6. Frédéric A Hayek & Pascal Lafourcade & Ariane Tichit, 2023. "Generic and Universal Local Cryptocurrency: LCoin," Post-Print hal-04176704, HAL.
    7. Gang Kou & Özlem Olgu Akdeniz & Hasan Dinçer & Serhat Yüksel, 2021. "Fintech investments in European banks: a hybrid IT2 fuzzy multidimensional decision-making approach," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 7(1), pages 1-28, December.
    8. Ammar AL-Ashmori & P. D. D. Dominic & Narinderjit Singh Sawaran Singh, 2022. "Items and Constructs of Blockchain Adoption in Software Development Industry: Experts Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-18, August.
    9. Kouhizadeh, Mahtab & Saberi, Sara & Sarkis, Joseph, 2021. "Blockchain technology and the sustainable supply chain: Theoretically exploring adoption barriers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    10. Han, Hongdan & Shiwakoti, Radha K. & Jarvis, Robin & Mordi, Chima & Botchie, David, 2023. "Accounting and auditing with blockchain technology and artificial Intelligence: A literature review," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 48(C).
    11. J. Leon Zhao & Shaokun Fan & Jiaqi Yan, 2016. "Overview of business innovations and research opportunities in blockchain and introduction to the special issue," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 2(1), pages 1-7, December.
    12. Liurui Deng & Yongbin Lv & Ye Liu & Yiwen Zhao, 2021. "Impact of Fintech on Bank Risk-Taking: Evidence from China," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-27, May.
    13. Aslanidis, Nektarios & Bariviera, Aurelio F. & López, Óscar G., 2022. "The link between cryptocurrencies and Google Trends attention," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 47(PA).
    14. Marat Rashitovich Safiullin & Leonid Alekseevich Elshin & Alia Aidarovna Abdukaeva & Maxim Vladimirovich Savushkin, 2020. "A Formalized Assessment of the Scenario Development of the National Economy in the Context of the Penetration of Blockchain Technologies Into the Financial Sector of Transactions," International Journal of Financial Research, International Journal of Financial Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 11(5), pages 199-204, October.
    15. Laxman Tandan & Ananta Raj Kafle & Khageshyor Khanal, 2022. "An Econometric Analysis on Interest Rate Reforms and Financial Deepening," International Journal of Finance, Insurance and Risk Management, International Journal of Finance, Insurance and Risk Management, vol. 12(3), pages 3-22.
    16. Lamprini Zarpala & Fran Casino, 2021. "A blockchain-based forensic model for financial crime investigation: the embezzlement scenario," Digital Finance, Springer, vol. 3(3), pages 301-332, December.
    17. Vincent Gramlich & Tobias Guggenberger & Marc Principato & Benjamin Schellinger & Nils Urbach, 2023. "A multivocal literature review of decentralized finance: Current knowledge and future research avenues," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-37, December.
    18. Evans, Olaniyi, 2018. "Blockchain Technology and the Financial Market: An Empirical Analysis," MPRA Paper 99212, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Ravi Kashyap, 2023. "DeFi Security: Turning The Weakest Link Into The Strongest Attraction," Papers 2312.00033, arXiv.org.
    20. Heidari , Hamed & Moosakhani , Morteza & Alborzi , Mahmood & Divandari , Ali & Radfar , Reza, 2018. "Evaluating the Factors Affecting Behavioral Intention in Using Blockchain Technology Capabilities as a Financial Instrument," Journal of Money and Economy, Monetary and Banking Research Institute, Central Bank of the Islamic Republic of Iran, vol. 13(2), pages 195-219, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:9:p:5311-:d:804214. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.