IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i9p5129-d801102.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Farmers’ Perception of the Use and Benefits of Cowpea Storage Methods in Northern Ghana

Author

Listed:
  • Ryan Kusi Osei-Asibey

    (Department of Food Science and Technology, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology (KNUST), PMB UPO, Kumasi, Ghana
    Department of Food and Postharvest Technology, Koforidua Technical University (KTU), Koforidua 03420, Ghana)

  • Faustina Dufie Wireko-Manu

    (Department of Food Science and Technology, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology (KNUST), PMB UPO, Kumasi, Ghana)

  • Robert Aidoo

    (Department of Agricultural Economics, Agribusiness and Extension, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology (KNUST), PMB UPO, Kumasi, Ghana)

  • Stanley Boakye-Achampong

    (Department of Agricultural Economics, Agribusiness and Extension, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology (KNUST), PMB UPO, Kumasi, Ghana)

  • Felix Charles Mills-Robertson

    (Department of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology (KNUST), PMB UPO, Kumasi, Ghana)

  • Dieudonne Baributsa

    (Department of Entomology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA)

Abstract

Insect infestation during the storage of cowpea is a major challenge among smallholder farmers in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Farmers use various postharvest storage methods to deal with insect pests, including insecticides, which may result in health and environmental hazards. Four hundred (400) cowpea farmers were interviewed on their perceptions and preference of different storage methods in Northern Ghana. About 58% of farmers applied insecticides, 50% used ash, and 42% used hermetic triple-layer bags (Purdue Improved Crop Storage, PICS) to store cowpea. Most farmers (85.6%) preferred the PICS technology for its effectiveness (compared to insecticides, ash, and botanicals). Reasons for the non-use of PICS bags included unavailability (39.5%) and high price (11.7%). Farmers perceived that storing cowpea in PICS bags lowered pesticide-related health risks for both farmers and consumers. Thus, there is a need to improve the availability and affordability of PICS bags in Northern Ghana.

Suggested Citation

  • Ryan Kusi Osei-Asibey & Faustina Dufie Wireko-Manu & Robert Aidoo & Stanley Boakye-Achampong & Felix Charles Mills-Robertson & Dieudonne Baributsa, 2022. "Farmers’ Perception of the Use and Benefits of Cowpea Storage Methods in Northern Ghana," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-10, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:9:p:5129-:d:801102
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/9/5129/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/9/5129/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jones, Michael & Alexander, Corinne E. & Lowenberg-DeBoer, James, 2011. "An Initial Investigation Of The Potential For Hermetic Purdue Improved Crop Storage (Pics) Bags To Improve Incomes For Maize Producers In Sub-Saharan Africa," Working papers 115554, Purdue University, Department of Agricultural Economics.
    2. Hamed Taherdoost, 2019. "What Is the Best Response Scale for Survey and Questionnaire Design; Review of Different Lengths of Rating Scale / Attitude Scale / Likert Scale," Post-Print hal-02557308, HAL.
    3. Michael Jones & Corinne Alexander & James Lowenberg-DeBoer, 2011. "An Initial Investigation Of The Potential For Hermetic Purdue Improved Cowpea Storage (Pics) Bags To Improve Incomes For Maize Producers In Sub-Saharan Africa," Working Papers 11-3, Purdue University, College of Agriculture, Department of Agricultural Economics.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Evelyne Sissinto Gbenou & Ygué Patrice Adégbola & Pélagie Manhoussi Hessavi & Segla Roch Cedrique Zossou & Gauthier Biaou, 2021. "On-Farm Assessment of Maize Storage and Conservation Technologies in the Central and Northern Republic of Benin," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-14, January.
    2. TerAvest, Dan & Wandschneider, Philip R. & Thierfelder, Christian & Reganold, John P., 2019. "Diversifying conservation agriculture and conventional tillage cropping systems to improve the wellbeing of smallholder farmers in Malawi," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 23-35.
    3. Castañeda, Jaime Andrés & Brennan, Mark & Goentzel, Jarrod, 2019. "A behavioral investigation of supply chain contracts for a newsvendor problem in a developing economy," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 72-83.
    4. Ye Jin & Qingning Lin & Shiping Mao, 2022. "Tanzanian Farmers’ Intention to Adopt Improved Maize Technology: Analyzing Influencing Factors Using SEM and fsQCA Methods," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-23, November.
    5. Hamed Taherdoost, 2021. "Data Collection Methods and Tools for Research; A Step-by-Step Guide to Choose Data Collection Technique for Academic and Business Research Projects," Post-Print hal-03741847, HAL.
    6. Hamed Taherdoost, 2021. "Data Collection Methods and Tools for Research; A Step-by-Step Guide to Choose Data Collection Technique for Academic and Business Research Projects Authors," Post-Print hal-03741834, HAL.
    7. Liao, Junyun & Pang, Jiecong & Dong, Xuebing, 2023. "More gain, more give? The impact of brand community value on users’ value co-creation," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    8. Loo Seng Neo & Jean Yi Colette Tan & Tierra Wan Yi Chew, 2022. "The Influence of COVID-19 on Women’s Perceptions of Work-Family Conflict in Singapore," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-13, February.
    9. Kadjo, Didier & Ricker-Gilbert, Jacob & Alexander, Corinne, 2015. "Does quality affect maize prices in sub-Saharan Africa? Evidence from Benin," 2015 AAEA & WAEA Joint Annual Meeting, July 26-28, San Francisco, California 205503, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    10. Bo Li & Rita Yi Man Li & Thitinant Wareewanich, 2021. "Factors Influencing Large Real Estate Companies’ Competitiveness: A Sustainable Development Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-20, November.
    11. Ke Ran Tee & Abdul Samat Ismail & Yong Heng Ang & Hidayah Husna Hishamuddin & Vinneeshah Jacob Paul & Azimatun Noor Aizuddin & Ida Zarina Zaini, 2022. "Prevalence of Anxiety and Burnout, and Coping Mechanisms among Clinical Year Medical Undergraduate Students in Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Amidst the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-14, October.
    12. Yohannes Girma & Berhanu Kuma & Amsalu Bedemo, 2023. "Risk Aversion and Perception of Farmers about Endogenous Risks: An Empirical Study for Maize Producers in Awi Zone, Amhara Region of Ethiopia," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-29, February.
    13. Hamed Taherdoost, 2022. "Designing a Questionnaire for a Research Paper: A Comprehensive Guide to Design and Develop an Effective Questionnaire," Post-Print hal-03741836, HAL.
    14. Jacopo Gaspari & Ernesto Antonini & Lia Marchi & Vincenzo Vodola, 2021. "Energy Transition at Home: A Survey on the Data and Practices That Lead to a Change in Household Energy Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-24, May.
    15. Rinaldi, Marta & Bottani, Eleonora, 2023. "How did COVID-19 affect logistics and supply chain processes? Immediate, short and medium-term evidence from some industrial fields of Italy," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    16. Debora Scarpato & Gennaro Civero & Mariarosaria Simeone, 2023. "Do Consumers Adhere to a Sustainable Mediterranean Food Pattern? An Analysis of Southern Italian Consumer Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-12, September.
    17. Fuyong Lu & Xintao Wang & Siheng Li & Qun Zhao, 2023. "How Mobile Health Livingstreaming Engages the Consumer-Insights from a Dual-Process Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-22, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:9:p:5129-:d:801102. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.