IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i9p5036-d799729.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effect of the Standardization of Service Platforms for High-Involvement PropTech Services

Author

Listed:
  • Jinmin Kim

    (Department of Corporate Management, Korea University, Seoul 30019, Korea)

  • AhRam Cho

    (Global Income Strategy Division, Miraeasset Global Investments, Seoul 03159, Korea)

  • Jaeyoung Kim

    (Department of Corporate Management, Korea University, Seoul 30019, Korea)

Abstract

In this study, we focus on the innovation resistance that has appeared in the process of accepting changed information technology services after the COVID-19 pandemic. Based on a survey of property technology (PropTech) service users in Korea, this study proposes an extended technology acceptance model that considers the antecedent variables of the information systems success model to implement a standard PropTech service platform, and analyzes the influence of the selected parameters. Service quality was applied as the antecedent variable to define system quality and service standards, considering the establishment of the service standards process suggested by the company. The selected parameters were the demand for the personalization of the service and the resistance to innovation, which implies the degree to which consumers refuse to accept new technologies. To this end, we conducted a questionnaire survey of 524 PropTech users from 11 October 2021 to 15 November 2021. This study analyzes the factors affecting consumers’ continued use intention in order to derive the service standardization of PropTech operations, and presents the mediating effects of innovation resistance and personalization to derive the implications for service standardization. The implications of this study are as follows: first, the possibility of innovation resistance in the PropTech service sector and its mechanisms are presented. Second, the necessity of redefining the quality dimension is proposed. Finally, we identify that additional research on innovation resistance to PropTech services is needed.

Suggested Citation

  • Jinmin Kim & AhRam Cho & Jaeyoung Kim, 2022. "Effect of the Standardization of Service Platforms for High-Involvement PropTech Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-18, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:9:p:5036-:d:799729
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/9/5036/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/9/5036/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christopher W. Starr & Jesse Saginor & Elaine Worzala, 2020. "The rise of PropTech: emerging industrial technologies and their impact on real estate," Journal of Property Investment & Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 39(2), pages 157-169, November.
    2. Trischler, Jakob & Johnson, Mikael & Kristensson, Per, 2020. "A service ecosystem perspective on the diffusion of sustainability-oriented user innovations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 552-560.
    3. Komlan Gbongli & Yongan Xu & Komi Mawugbe Amedjonekou, 2019. "Extended Technology Acceptance Model to Predict Mobile-Based Money Acceptance and Sustainability: A Multi-Analytical Structural Equation Modeling and Neural Network Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-33, July.
    4. Kamal, Syeda Ayesha & Shafiq, Muhammad & Kakria, Priyanka, 2020. "Investigating acceptance of telemedicine services through an extended technology acceptance model (TAM)," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    5. Aijaz A. Shaikh & Richard Glavee-Geo & Heikki Karjaluoto, 2018. "How Relevant Are Risk Perceptions, Effort, and Performance Expectancy in Mobile Banking Adoption?," International Journal of E-Business Research (IJEBR), IGI Global, vol. 14(2), pages 39-60, April.
    6. Manis, Kerry T. & Choi, Danny, 2019. "The virtual reality hardware acceptance model (VR-HAM): Extending and individuating the technology acceptance model (TAM) for virtual reality hardware," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 503-513.
    7. Fabian Aulkemeier & Mohammad Anggasta Paramartha & Maria-Eugenia Iacob & Jos Hillegersberg, 2016. "A pluggable service platform architecture for e-commerce," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 469-489, August.
    8. Riegger, Anne-Sophie & Klein, Jan F. & Merfeld, Katrin & Henkel, Sven, 2021. "Technology-enabled personalization in retail stores: Understanding drivers and barriers," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 140-155.
    9. Mousa Albashrawi & Luvai Motiwalla, 2019. "Privacy and Personalization in Continued Usage Intention of Mobile Banking: An Integrative Perspective," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 21(5), pages 1031-1043, October.
    10. Kim, Junic, 2021. "Platform quality factors influencing content providers’ loyalty," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    11. Ramkumar, M. & Schoenherr, Tobias & Wagner, Stephan M. & Jenamani, Mamata, 2019. "Q-TAM: A quality technology acceptance model for predicting organizational buyers’ continuance intentions for e-procurement services," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 333-348.
    12. Albert Saiz, 2020. "Bricks, mortar, and proptech," Journal of Property Investment & Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 38(4), pages 327-347, March.
    13. Jinmin Kim & Jaeyoung Kim, 2021. "An Integrated Analysis of Value-Based Adoption Model and Information Systems Success Model for PropTech Service Platform," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-17, November.
    14. Seon Hee Kim & Joon Ho Bae & Hyeon Mo Jeon, 2019. "Continuous Intention on Accommodation Apps: Integrated Value-Based Adoption and Expectation–Confirmation Model Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-17, March.
    15. Lee, Eun-Jung & Park, Jung Kun, 2009. "Online service personalization for apparel shopping," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 16(2), pages 83-91.
    16. William H. DeLone & Ephraim R. McLean, 1992. "Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 3(1), pages 60-95, March.
    17. Tenenhaus, Michel & Vinzi, Vincenzo Esposito & Chatelin, Yves-Marie & Lauro, Carlo, 2005. "PLS path modeling," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 159-205, January.
    18. Sklyar, Alexey & Kowalkowski, Christian & Tronvoll, Bård & Sörhammar, David, 2019. "Organizing for digital servitization: A service ecosystem perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 450-460.
    19. Matsuo, Makoto & Minami, Chieko & Matsuyama, Takuya, 2018. "Social influence on innovation resistance in internet banking services," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 42-51.
    20. Fedorko Igor & Bacik Radovan & Gavurova Beata, 2018. "Technology acceptance model in e-commerce segment," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 13(4), pages 1242-1256, December.
    21. Kaur, Puneet & Dhir, Amandeep & Singh, Naveen & Sahu, Ganesh & Almotairi, Mohammad, 2020. "An innovation resistance theory perspective on mobile payment solutions," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pierfrancesco De Paola & Francesco Tajani & Marco Locurcio & Felicia Di Liddo, 2022. "Sustainable Real Estate and Resilient Cities: Management, Assessment and Innovations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-9, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jinmin Kim & Jaeyoung Kim, 2021. "An Integrated Analysis of Value-Based Adoption Model and Information Systems Success Model for PropTech Service Platform," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-17, November.
    2. Yafen Tseng & Beyfen Lee & Chingi Chen & Wang He, 2022. "Understanding Agri-Food Traceability System User Intention in Respond to COVID-19 Pandemic: The Comparisons of Three Models," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-20, January.
    3. Le Tung Bach, 2023. "The behavioral intention to adopt Proptech services in Vietnam real estate market," Papers 2312.06994, arXiv.org.
    4. Khire Rushikesh Ulhas & Jung-Yu Lai & Juite Wang, 2016. "Impacts of collaborative IS on software development project success in Indian software firms: a service perspective," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 315-336, May.
    5. E. Raguseo & Pigni, F. & Claudio Vitari, 2021. "Streams of digital data and competitive advantage: The mediation effects of process efficiency and product effectiveness," Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print) hal-03323663, HAL.
    6. Lin Li & Kyung Young Lee & Emmanuel Emokpae & Sung-Byung Yang, 2021. "What makes you continuously use chatbot services? Evidence from chinese online travel agencies," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 31(3), pages 575-599, September.
    7. Liu, Yu-li & Yan, Wenjia & Hu, Bo, 2021. "Resistance to facial recognition payment in China: The influence of privacy-related factors," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(5).
    8. Gyutae Lee & Yunsik Kim, 2022. "Effects of Resistance Barriers to Service Robots on Alternative Attractiveness and Intention to Use," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, May.
    9. E. Raguseo & Pigni, F. & Claudio Vitari, 2021. "Streams of digital data and competitive advantage: The mediation effects of process efficiency and product effectiveness," Post-Print hal-03323663, HAL.
    10. Talwar, Shalini & Talwar, Manish & Kaur, Puneet & Dhir, Amandeep, 2020. "Consumers’ resistance to digital innovations: A systematic review and framework development," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 286-299.
    11. Souha Al-Geitany & Hasan Yousef Aljuhmani & Okechukwu Lawrence Emeagwali & Elsie Nasr, 2023. "Consumer Behavior in the Post-COVID-19 Era: The Impact of Perceived Interactivity on Behavioral Intention in the Context of Virtual Conferences," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-23, May.
    12. Huang, Dan & Jin, Xin & Coghlan, Alexandra, 2021. "Advances in consumer innovation resistance research: A review and research agenda," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    13. Hoda M. Aboalsamh & Laith T. Khrais & Sami A. Albahussain, 2023. "Pioneering Perception of Green Fintech in Promoting Sustainable Digital Services Application within Smart Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-13, July.
    14. Lim, Joon Soo & Zhang, Jun, 2022. "Adoption of AI-driven personalization in digital news platforms: An integrative model of technology acceptance and perceived contingency," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    15. Kuo Cheng Chung & Silvia Wan-Ju Liang, 2020. "Understanding Factors Affecting Innovation Resistance of Mobile Payments in Taiwan: An Integrative Perspective," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-19, October.
    16. Pinyi Yao & Mohamad Fazli Sabri & Syuhaily Osman & Norzalina Zainudin & Yezheng Li, 2023. "Consumers’ Continued Intention to Use Online-to-Offline (O2O) Services in Omnichannel Retail: Differences between To-Shop and To-Home Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-23, January.
    17. Ram, Jiwat & Corkindale, David & Wu, Ming-Lu, 2013. "Implementation critical success factors (CSFs) for ERP: Do they contribute to implementation success and post-implementation performance?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(1), pages 157-174.
    18. Ashraf Hilal & Concepción Varela-Neira, 2022. "Understanding Consumer Adoption of Mobile Banking: Extending the UTAUT2 Model with Proactive Personality," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-23, November.
    19. Kim, Yaeri & Seok, Junhee & Roh, Taewoo, 2023. "The linkage between quality of information systems and the impact of trust-based privacy on behavioral outcomes in unmanned convenience store: Moderating effect of gender and experience," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    20. Jafarzadeh, Hamed & Tafti, Mahdi & Intezari, Ali & Sohrabi, Babak, 2021. "All's well that ends well: Effective recovery from failures during the delivery phase of e-retailing process," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:9:p:5036-:d:799729. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.