IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i7p4237-d786075.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Beach Access, Property Rights, and Social-Distributive Questions: A Cross-National Legal Perspective of Fifteen Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Rachelle Alterman

    (Faculty of Architecture and Town Planning and Neaman Institute for National Policy Research, Technion—Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 32000, Israel)

  • Cygal Pellach

    (Faculty of Architecture and Town Planning and Neaman Institute for National Policy Research, Technion—Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 32000, Israel)

Abstract

The right to access and enjoy the coastal zone, and especially the beach, is a centuries-old legal tenet in many countries and a key part of Integrated Coastal Zone Management. However, the legal right for coastal access takes on different forms and degrees in different countries (or states). In this paper we argue that accessibility to coastal zones should be seen as a multi-faceted concept, and we distinguish among four different categories of accessibly. The first two—horizontal and vertical access—are the usual notions. We add two more: access to sea views, and access for people with disabilities. Regarding all four categories, in addition to the legal survey, we also attempt to point out some potential social justice issues. The comparative analysis focuses on national-level law and policy in fifteen advanced-economy countries. Most are also signatories to one or two international legal or policy rules about coastal management. The factual information on each country is based on country reports by top national scholars recently published in a book initiated and edited by this paper’s authors. In this paper, the authors develop further systematic comparative analysis within a new theoretical framing. The findings show that to date, the international rules have had only limited on-the-ground influence. Many gaps remain, mirroring cross-national inequalities in the rights to beach access. The comparative findings point to some emerging trends—both progressive and regressive. The conclusions call for upgrading the issue of coastal access rights through further research on aspects of implementation and through cross-national exchange.

Suggested Citation

  • Rachelle Alterman & Cygal Pellach, 2022. "Beach Access, Property Rights, and Social-Distributive Questions: A Cross-National Legal Perspective of Fifteen Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-23, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:7:p:4237-:d:786075
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/7/4237/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/7/4237/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mikiko Terashima & Kate Clark, 2021. "The Precarious Absence of Disability Perspectives in Planning Research," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(1), pages 120-132.
    2. Jinwon Kim & Sarah Nicholls, 2018. "Access for all? Beach access and equity in the Detroit metropolitan area," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 61(7), pages 1137-1161, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kim, Jinwon & Jang, Seongsoo & Kang, Sanghoon & Kim, SeungHyun (James), 2020. "Why are hotel room prices different? Exploring spatially varying relationships between room price and hotel attributes," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 118-129.
    2. Marta Nalej & Elżbieta Lewandowicz, 2023. "An Analysis of Recreational and Leisure Areas in Polish Counties with the Use of Geographically Weighted Regression," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-26, December.
    3. Thomas W. Sanchez, 2021. "Innovations and Development in Urban Planning Scholarship and Research," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(1), pages 89-92.
    4. Lee, Yong-Jin Alex & Jang, Seongsoo & Kim, Jinwon, 2020. "Tourism clusters and peer-to-peer accommodation," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    5. Bruce Stiftel, 2021. "Are We Kidding Ourselves That Research Leads Practice?," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(1), pages 154-155.
    6. Levine, Kaylyn & Karner, Alex, 2023. "Approaching accessibility: Four opportunities to address the needs of disabled people in transportation planning in the United States," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 66-74.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:7:p:4237-:d:786075. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.