IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/urbpla/v6y2021i1p89-92.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Innovations and Development in Urban Planning Scholarship and Research

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas W. Sanchez

    (Urban Affairs and Planning, Virginia Tech, USA)

Abstract

Urban planning is characterized by involving a wide range of experts from a variety of fields. Therefore, planning research draws upon each of these fields in how it interprets an examines the natural and built environment as elements of human settlement activities. As a small professional and academic discipline incorporating aspects of design, policy, law, social sciences, and engineering, it is understandable that research outcomes are published in a broad range of academic outlets. It is useful for us to reflect on our research intentions, processes, and outcomes, which is also referred to as ‘research about research,’ with a focus on the scholarly products of urban planning academics. We can do this by examining our methodologies, subdomains, application of research to practice, research impact, and bibliometrics. The purpose of reflecting on our research helps us better understand research processes and the resulting body of urban planning research and scholarship as a whole.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas W. Sanchez, 2021. "Innovations and Development in Urban Planning Scholarship and Research," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(1), pages 89-92.
    • Handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v:6:y:2021:i:1:p:89-92
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/4135
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Töppel, Mandy & Reichel, Christian, 2021. "Qualitative Methods and Hybrid Maps for Spatial Perception with an Example of Security Perception," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 6(1), pages 105-119.
    2. Mikiko Terashima & Kate Clark, 2021. "The Precarious Absence of Disability Perspectives in Planning Research," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(1), pages 120-132.
    3. Bruce Stiftel, 2021. "Are We Kidding Ourselves That Research Leads Practice?," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(1), pages 154-155.
    4. Thomas W. Sanchez, 2021. "Urban Planning Academics: Tweets and Citations," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(1), pages 146-153.
    5. Danielle Zoe Rivera, 2021. "Design in Planning: Reintegration through Shifting Values," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(1), pages 93-104.
    6. Robin A. Chang, 2021. "How Do Scholars Communicate the ‘Temporary Turn’ in Urban Studies? A Socio-Semiotic Framework," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(1), pages 133-145.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bruce Stiftel, 2021. "Are We Kidding Ourselves That Research Leads Practice?," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(1), pages 154-155.
    2. Sofia Morgado, 2021. "Urban Rehabilitation, Social Innovation, and New Working Spaces in Lisbon," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-14, October.
    3. Rachelle Alterman & Cygal Pellach, 2022. "Beach Access, Property Rights, and Social-Distributive Questions: A Cross-National Legal Perspective of Fifteen Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-23, April.
    4. Levine, Kaylyn & Karner, Alex, 2023. "Approaching accessibility: Four opportunities to address the needs of disabled people in transportation planning in the United States," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 66-74.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    planning; research; scholarship;
    All these keywords.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v:6:y:2021:i:1:p:89-92. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.