IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i5p3132-d766069.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Review of Neighborhood Sustainability Assessment Tools

Author

Listed:
  • Pasqualino Boschetto

    (Department of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering (DICEA), University of Padua, 35131 Padova, Italy)

  • Alessandro Bove

    (Department of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering (DICEA), University of Padua, 35131 Padova, Italy)

  • Elena Mazzola

    (Department of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering (DICEA), University of Padua, 35131 Padova, Italy)

Abstract

The paper aims to evaluate criteria for appraising the existing urban transformation projects in view of the social dimension of sustainability. Within the case study of the recovery project of “G. Prandina” barrack in Padua, north-east of Italy, the paper compares two different Italian rating systems to evaluate neighborhood sustainability: “GBC Quartieri” and “ITACA Scala Urbana”. The GBC Quartieri rating system, with a point scheme, allots credits for neighborhood design features, and integrates the environment, infrastructures, and buildings for the creation of sustainable communities with a relationship net and a pre-existence connection. The “ITACA Scala Urbana” procedure consists of a multicriteria evaluation of the environmental sustainability and the compilation of a group of worksheets, one for each different internal performance indicator. The results show the main differences and analogies among the different tools, and this analysis confirms that new neighborhood protocols originating from building rating systems dedicate little space to social aspects and to the concept of inclusion, instead of the newly developed neighborhood protocols. Through this examination, the research can also conclude that the identification of common macro-areas is present, which highlights the different levels of importance given to the various features connected to social sustainability in neighborhood transformation.

Suggested Citation

  • Pasqualino Boschetto & Alessandro Bove & Elena Mazzola, 2022. "Comparative Review of Neighborhood Sustainability Assessment Tools," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-14, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:5:p:3132-:d:766069
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/5/3132/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/5/3132/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sandra Alker & Victoria Joy & Peter Roberts & Nathan Smith, 2000. "The Definition of Brownfield," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(1), pages 49-69.
    2. Elena Mazzola & Tiziano Dalla Mora & Fabio Peron & Piercarlo Romagnoni, 2019. "An Integrated Energy and Environmental Audit Process for Historic Buildings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-18, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. J.W.R. Whitehand & N.J. Morton, 2006. "The Fringe-belt Phenomenon and Socioeconomic Change," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 43(11), pages 2047-2066, October.
    2. Anna Alberini & Dennis Guignet, 2008. "Voluntary Cleanups and Redevelopment Potential: Lessons from Baltimore, Maryland," Working Papers 2008.87, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    3. Meg Holden & Andy Scerri & Azadeh Hadizadeh Esfahani, 2015. "Justifying Redevelopment ‘Failures' Within Urban ‘Success Stories': Dispute, Compromise, and a New Test of Urbanity," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(3), pages 451-470, May.
    4. Perić Ana, 2016. "Institutional Cooperation in the Brownfield Regeneration Process: Experiences from Central and Eastern European Countries," European Spatial Research and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 23(1), pages 21-46, June.
    5. Marjorie Tendero & Cécile Bazart, 2018. "" Empty lands " ? Social representations of contaminated brownfields in France," Working Papers halshs-01709548, HAL.
    6. Han, Qingye & Zhu, Yuming & Ke, Ginger Y. & Hipel, Keith W., 2019. "Public private partnership in brownfield remediation projects in China: Identification and structure analysis of risks," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 87-104.
    7. Anna Życzyńska & Zbigniew Suchorab & Jan Kočí & Robert Černý, 2020. "Energy Effects of Retrofitting the Educational Facilities Located in South-Eastern Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-16, May.
    8. Kronenburg García, Angela & Meyfroidt, Patrick & Abeygunawardane, Dilini & Sitoe, Almeida A., 2022. "Waves and legacies: The making of an investment frontier in Niassa, Mozambique," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 27(1).
    9. Ricardo J. G. Mateus & João C. Bana e Costa & Pedro Verga Matos, 2017. "Supporting Multicriteria Group Decisions with MACBETH Tools: Selection of Sustainable Brownfield Redevelopment Actions," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 495-521, May.
    10. Liviu Jigoria-Oprea & Nicolae Popa, 2017. "Industrial brownfields: An unsolved problem in post-socialist cities. A comparison between two mono industrial cities: ReÅŸiÅ£a (Romania) and PanÄ evo (Serbia)," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(12), pages 2719-2738, September.
    11. B Glumac & Q Han & W Schaefer, 2018. "A negotiation decision model for public–private partnerships in brownfield redevelopment," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 45(1), pages 145-160, January.
    12. Hunter Bacot & Cindy O’Dell, 2006. "Establishing Indicators to Evaluate Brownfield Redevelopment," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 20(2), pages 142-161, May.
    13. Cristina Piselli & Jessica Romanelli & Matteo Di Grazia & Augusto Gavagni & Elisa Moretti & Andrea Nicolini & Franco Cotana & Francesco Strangis & Henk J. L. Witte & Anna Laura Pisello, 2020. "An Integrated HBIM Simulation Approach for Energy Retrofit of Historical Buildings Implemented in a Case Study of a Medieval Fortress in Italy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-21, May.
    14. Flavio Rosa, 2020. "Building-Integrated Photovoltaics (BIPV) in Historical Buildings: Opportunities and Constraints," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-28, July.
    15. Naveed Ahmad & Yuming Zhu & Muhammad Ibrahim & Muhammad Waqas & Abdul Waheed, 2018. "Development of a Standard Brownfield Definition, Guidelines, and Evaluation Index System for Brownfield Redevelopment in Developing Countries: The Case of Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-22, November.
    16. Belén Onecha & Alicia Dotor & Carlos Marmolejo-Duarte, 2021. "Beyond Cultural and Historic Values, Sustainability as a New Kind of Value for Historic Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-18, July.
    17. Hongli Lin & Yuming Zhu & Jiahe Zhou & Bingxu Mu & Caihong Liu, 2022. "Stakeholder Engagement Behavior(s) in Sustainable Brownfield Regeneration: A Network Embeddedness Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-21, May.
    18. Raul P. Lejano & Anne Taufen Wessells, 2006. "Community and Economic Development: Seeking Common Ground in Discourse and in Practice," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 43(9), pages 1469-1489, August.
    19. Mellor, P. & Lord, R.A. & João, E. & Thomas, R. & Hursthouse, A., 2021. "Identifying non-agricultural marginal lands as a route to sustainable bioenergy provision - A review and holistic definition," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    20. Tonin, Stefania & Bonifaci, Pietro, 2020. "Assessment of brownfield redevelopment opportunities using a multi-tiered approach: A case in Italy," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:5:p:3132-:d:766069. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.