IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i5p2873-d762005.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Integrated Adoption Model to Manage Blockchain-Driven Business Innovation in a Sustainable Way

Author

Listed:
  • Nusi Drljevic

    (Department of Business and Economics, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain)

  • Daniel Arias Aranda

    (Department of Business and Economics, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain)

  • Vladimir Stantchev

    (Institute of Information Systems, SRH University Berlin, 10587 Berlin, Germany)

Abstract

Blockchain technology has the potential to drive innovations across various industries, businesses, and use cases. It is broadly recognized that innovation is a vital source of competitive advantage in a rapidly changing environment. High expectations surround blockchain’s potential for contributing to sustainable economic and social development. However, current blockchain projects still show high failure rates. The associated side effects of such failure rates generate a negative impact on economic and social sustainability performances such as corporate governance, risk management, finance management, human resources and culture management, and competitiveness. This paper assesses adoption models and their risk and success factors. Building on a novel, integrated adoption model to operationalize, measure and manage blockchain-driven business innovation in a sustainable way, we assessed its applicability with an empirical study across 20 industry sectors and 125 business leaders. The results reveal that the developed adoption model holds the potential to support the sustainable usage of blockchain technology for business innovations, not limited to a specific industry or use case. Further case studies and industry activities can be carried out to continue its validation in future works.

Suggested Citation

  • Nusi Drljevic & Daniel Arias Aranda & Vladimir Stantchev, 2022. "An Integrated Adoption Model to Manage Blockchain-Driven Business Innovation in a Sustainable Way," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-21, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:5:p:2873-:d:762005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/5/2873/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/5/2873/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Huaiqing Wang & Kun Chen & Dongming Xu, 2016. "A maturity model for blockchain adoption," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 2(1), pages 1-5, December.
    2. Orji, Ifeyinwa Juliet & Kusi-Sarpong, Simonov & Huang, Shuangfa & Vazquez-Brust, Diego, 2020. "Evaluating the factors that influence blockchain adoption in the freight logistics industry," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    3. Mary M. Crossan & Marina Apaydin, 2010. "A Multi‐Dimensional Framework of Organizational Innovation: A Systematic Review of the Literature," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(6), pages 1154-1191, September.
    4. Kieran Mathieson, 1991. "Predicting User Intentions: Comparing the Technology Acceptance Model with the Theory of Planned Behavior," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 2(3), pages 173-191, September.
    5. Balci, Gökcay & Surucu-Balci, Ebru, 2021. "Blockchain adoption in the maritime supply chain: Examining barriers and salient stakeholders in containerized international trade," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Magdalena Roszczyńska-Kurasińska & Nina Wróblewska, 2023. "Technological Innovations for Citizen Environmental Participation: Case of Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-19, March.
    2. Shafaq Khan & Mohammed Shael & Munir Majdalawieh & Nishara Nizamuddin & Mathew Nicho, 2022. "Blockchain for Governments: The Case of the Dubai Government," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-22, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Singh, Atul Kumar & Kumar, V.R. Prasath & Dehdasht, Gholamreza & Mohandes, Saeed Reza & Manu, Patrick & Pour Rahimian, Farzad, 2023. "Investigating barriers to blockchain adoption in construction supply chain management: A fuzzy-based MCDM approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    2. Hamed Taherdoost, 2022. "A Critical Review of Blockchain Acceptance Models—Blockchain Technology Adoption Frameworks and Applications," Post-Print hal-03741851, HAL.
    3. Swen Nadkarni & Reinhard Prügl, 2021. "Digital transformation: a review, synthesis and opportunities for future research," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 71(2), pages 233-341, April.
    4. Tal Shahor, 2018. "Is the Marginal Effect of Education on Income Diminishing?," European Journal of Economics and Business Studies Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 4, May - Aug.
    5. Agumas Alamirew Mebratu, 2024. "Theoretical foundations of voluntary tax compliance: evidence from a developing country," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-8, December.
    6. Bentivoglio, Deborah & Bucci, Giorgia & Belletti, Matteo & Finco, Adele, 2022. "A theoretical framework on network’s dynamics for precision agriculture technologies adoption," Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural (RESR), Sociedade Brasileira de Economia e Sociologia Rural, vol. 60(4), January.
    7. Christian Sillaber & Bernhard Waltl & Horst Treiblmaier & Ulrich Gallersdörfer & Michael Felderer, 2021. "Laying the foundation for smart contract development: an integrated engineering process model," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 863-882, September.
    8. Rubio-Andrés, Mercedes & Ramos-González, Mª del Mar & Sastre-Castillo, Miguel Ángel & Gutiérrez-Broncano, Santiago, 2023. "Stakeholder pressure and innovation capacity of SMEs in the COVID-19 pandemic: Mediating and multigroup analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    9. Kwang O. Park, 2020. "A Study on Sustainable Usage Intention of Blockchain in the Big Data Era: Logistics and Supply Chain Management Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-15, December.
    10. Dimitrios Kafetzopoulos & Evangelos Psomas, 2016. "ORGANISATIONAL LEARNING, NON-TECHNICAL INNOVATION AND CUSTOMER SATISFACTION OF SMEs," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 20(03), pages 1-28, April.
    11. Julia Naranjo-Valencia & Ricardo Vidal-Patiño & Gregorio Calderón-Hernández, 2019. "Characterization of Innovation Research Published in Latin American Journals Indexed in WoS," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(07), pages 1-38, November.
    12. Donald F. Kuratko & Greg Fisher & James M. Bloodgood & Jeffrey S. Hornsby, 2017. "The paradox of new venture legitimation within an entrepreneurial ecosystem," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 49(1), pages 119-140, June.
    13. Georgios Giotis & Evangelia Papadionysiou, 2022. "The Role of Managerial and Technological Innovations in the Tourism Industry: A Review of the Empirical Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-20, April.
    14. Gregori, Patrick & Ukobitz, Desiree V. & Parastuty, Zulaicha, 2018. "A Conceptual Framework on Entrepreneurial Team Member Exits: A Starting Point for Further Research," 6th International OFEL Conference on Governance, Management and Entrepreneurship. New Business Models and Institutional Entrepreneurs: Leading Disruptive Change (Dubrovnik, 2018), in: 6th International OFEL Conference on Governance, Management and Entrepreneurship. New Business Models and Institutional Entrepreneurs: Leading Disrupt, pages 453-474, Governance Research and Development Centre (CIRU), Zagreb.
    15. Nistor, Cristian, 2013. "A conceptual model for the use of social media in companies," MPRA Paper 44224, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Bordunos, A. & Kosheleva, S., 2016. "High Involvement Work System from organizational and individual perspective," Working Papers 6445, Graduate School of Management, St. Petersburg State University.
    17. Graeme Joseph Allen, 2022. "Concepturealize™: a new contribution to generate real-needs-focussed, user-centred, lean business models," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-33, December.
    18. Abecassis-Moedas, Celine & Sguera, Francesco & Ettlie, John E., 2016. "Observe, innovate, succeed: A learning perspective on innovation and the performance of entrepreneurial chefs," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(8), pages 2840-2848.
    19. Muhammad Ali & Syed Ali Raza & Chin-Hong Puah & Mohd Zaini Abd Karim, 2017. "Islamic home financing in Pakistan: a SEM-based approach using modified TPB model," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(8), pages 1156-1177, November.
    20. Darmani, Anna & Rickne, Annika & Hidalgo, Antonio & Arvidsson, Niklas, 2016. "When outcomes are the reflection of the analysis criteria: A review of the tradable green certificate assessments," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 372-381.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:5:p:2873-:d:762005. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.