IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i5p2665-d757949.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Does My Train Line Run? Elicitation of Six Information-Seeking Profiles of Regular Suburban Train Users

Author

Listed:
  • Pascal Un

    (IRT SystemX, Paris-Saclay, F-91120 Palaiseau, France
    COSYS-GRETTIA, Univ Gustave Eiffel, F-77454 Marne-la-Vallée, France
    LaPEA, Univ Gustave Eiffel, F-78008 Versailles, France)

  • Sonia Adelé

    (IRT SystemX, Paris-Saclay, F-91120 Palaiseau, France
    COSYS-GRETTIA, Univ Gustave Eiffel, F-77454 Marne-la-Vallée, France)

  • Flore Vallet

    (IRT SystemX, Paris-Saclay, F-91120 Palaiseau, France
    Laboratoire Génie Industriel, Université Paris-Saclay, CentraleSupélec, F-91190 Gif-sur-Yvette, France)

  • Jean-Marie Burkhardt

    (LaPEA, Univ Gustave Eiffel, F-78008 Versailles, France)

Abstract

Information is at the heart of the smooth running of a public transport network and the satisfaction of its users, particularly in disrupted situations. Information is a central element for users to continue to use this mode contributing to sustainable mobility and even attracting new users. Therefore, it is essential to understand how travellers use passenger information to adjust the way it is disseminated to actual usage. This article aims to identify the sources of information used by travellers and at what moments they consult them in order to categorise passengers according to these activities. We conducted an online questionnaire on 258 regular suburban train users of a specific branch of one particular line (with the same information material in the stations). In addition to univariate descriptive analyses, the results were analysed using Multiple Correspondence Analysis and Ascending Hierarchical Clustering to construct six information-seeking profiles named: Improvisers, Monitors, Planners, Circumscribed, Ultra-connected and Routinized. Based on clustering, we were able to link sociodemographic or travel characteristics to information-seeking behaviour. Differences in information acquisition and use were identified. These results suggest great information-seeking behaviour disparities and can provide interesting information to passenger transport stakeholders. The results could be further integrated into a multi-agent simulation.

Suggested Citation

  • Pascal Un & Sonia Adelé & Flore Vallet & Jean-Marie Burkhardt, 2022. "How Does My Train Line Run? Elicitation of Six Information-Seeking Profiles of Regular Suburban Train Users," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-22, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:5:p:2665-:d:757949
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/5/2665/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/5/2665/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Konstantinos Papangelis & John D. Nelson & Somayajulu Sripada & Mark Beecroft, 2016. "The effects of mobile real-time information on rural passengers," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(1), pages 97-114, February.
    2. Grotenhuis, Jan-Willem & Wiegmans, Bart W. & Rietveld, Piet, 2007. "The desired quality of integrated multimodal travel information in public transport: Customer needs for time and effort savings," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 14(1), pages 27-38, January.
    3. Brendan Pender & Graham Currie & Alexa Delbosc & Nirajan Shiwakoti, 2014. "Social Media Use during Unplanned Transit Network Disruptions: A Review of Literature," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(4), pages 501-521, July.
    4. Konstantinos Gkiotsalitis & Oded Cats, 2021. "Public transport planning adaption under the COVID-19 pandemic crisis: literature review of research needs and directions," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(3), pages 374-392, May.
    5. Nyblom, Åsa, 2014. "Making plans or “just thinking about the trip”? Understanding people’s travel planning in practice," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 30-39.
    6. Candace Brakewood & Kari Watkins, 2019. "A literature review of the passenger benefits of real-time transit information," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(3), pages 327-356, May.
    7. Tommy Gärling & Kay Axhausen, 2003. "Introduction: Habitual travel choice," Transportation, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 1-11, February.
    8. Yung-Hsiang Cheng, 2010. "Exploring passenger anxiety associated with train travel," Transportation, Springer, vol. 37(6), pages 875-896, November.
    9. Mulley, Corinne & Clifton, Geoffrey Tilden & Balbontin, Camila & Ma, Liang, 2017. "Information for travelling: Awareness and usage of the various sources of information available to public transport users in NSW," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 111-132.
    10. Arkadiusz Adam Drabicki & Md Faqhrul Islam & Andrzej Szarata, 2021. "Investigating the Impact of Public Transport Service Disruptions upon Passenger Travel Behaviour—Results from Krakow City," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-14, August.
    11. Eran Ben-Elia & Erel Avineri, 2015. "Response to Travel Information: A Behavioural Review," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(3), pages 352-377, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lyons, Glenn & Hammond, Paul & Mackay, Kate, 2019. "The importance of user perspective in the evolution of MaaS," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 22-36.
    2. Blayac, Thierry & Stéphan, Maïté, 2021. "Are retrospective rail punctuality indicators useful? Evidence from users perceptions," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 193-213.
    3. Jochem, Patrick & Lisson, Christopher & Khanna, Arpita Asha, 2021. "The role of coordination costs in mode choice decisions: A case study of German cities," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 31-44.
    4. Lyons, Glenn & Hammond, Paul & Mackay, Kate, 2020. "Reprint of: The importance of user perspective in the evolution of MaaS," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 20-34.
    5. Paulsen, Mads & Rasmussen, Thomas Kjær & Nielsen, Otto Anker, 2021. "Impacts of real-time information levels in public transport: A large-scale case study using an adaptive passenger path choice model," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 155-182.
    6. Liu, Luyu & Miller, Harvey J., 2020. "Does real-time transit information reduce waiting time? An empirical analysis," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 167-179.
    7. Mulley, Corinne & Clifton, Geoffrey Tilden & Balbontin, Camila & Ma, Liang, 2017. "Information for travelling: Awareness and usage of the various sources of information available to public transport users in NSW," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 111-132.
    8. Lattarulo, Patrizia & Masucci, Valentino & Pazienza, Maria Grazia, 2019. "Resistance to change: Car use and routines," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 63-72.
    9. Ceder, Avishai & Chowdhury, Subeh & Taghipouran, Nima & Olsen, Jared, 2013. "Modelling public-transport users’ behaviour at connection point," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 112-122.
    10. Wen Hua & Ghim Ping Ong, 2018. "Effect of information contagion during train service disruption for an integrated rail-bus transit system," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 10(3), pages 571-594, December.
    11. Chowdhury, Subeh & Ceder, Avishai (Avi), 2016. "Users’ willingness to ride an integrated public-transport service: A literature review," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 183-195.
    12. Anthony Downward & Subeh Chowdhury & Chapa Jayalath, 2019. "An investigation of route-choice in integrated public transport networks by risk-averse users," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 89-110, June.
    13. Kriswardhana, Willy & Esztergár-Kiss, Domokos, 2023. "Exploring the aspects of MaaS adoption based on college students’ preferences," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 113-125.
    14. Wenwen Zhang & Camille Barchers & Janille Smith-Colin, 2023. "Transit communication via Twitter during the COVID-19 pandemic," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 50(5), pages 1244-1261, June.
    15. Zhang, Mengzhu & Zhao, Pengjun & Qiao, Si, 2020. "Smartness-induced transport inequality: Privacy concern, lacking knowledge of smartphone use and unequal access to transport information," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 175-185.
    16. Tim F. Thormann & Pamela Wicker, 2024. "Environmentally-Friendly Stadium Travel of Football Fans: A Stated Preferences Study," Journal of Sports Economics, , vol. 25(1), pages 3-29, January.
    17. Goh, Hyewon & Choi, Gahyun & Song, Yena, 2023. "How the COVID-19 pandemic changed travel behaviour? A case study on public bikes in Seoul," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    18. Kim, Eui-Jin & Kim, Youngseo & Jang, Sunghoon & Kim, Dong-Kyu, 2021. "Tourists’ preference on the combination of travel modes under Mobility-as-a-Service environment," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 236-255.
    19. Wang, Bobin & Shao, Chunfu & Ji, Xun, 2017. "Dynamic analysis of holiday travel behaviour with integrated multimodal travel information usage: A life-oriented approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 255-280.
    20. Lovejoy, Kristin, 2012. "Mobility Fulfillment Among Low-car Households: Implications for Reducing Auto Dependence in the United States," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt4v44b5qn, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:5:p:2665-:d:757949. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.