IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i22p15249-d975366.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Systematic Review of Knowledge Representation Techniques in Smart Agriculture (Urban)

Author

Listed:
  • Bikram Pratim Bhuyan

    (School of Computer Science, University of Petroleum and Energy Studies, Dehradun 248006, India
    LISV Laboratory, University of Paris Saclay, 10-12 Avenue of Europe, 78140 Velizy, France
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Ravi Tomar

    (Persistent Systems, Pune 411016, India
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Amar Ramdane Cherif

    (LISV Laboratory, University of Paris Saclay, 10-12 Avenue of Europe, 78140 Velizy, France
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

Abstract

Urban agriculture is the practice of growing food inside the city limits. Due to the exponential amount of data generated by information and technology-based farm management systems, we need proper methods to represent the data. The branch of artificial intelligence known as “knowledge representation and reasoning” is devoted to the representation of information about the environment in a way where a computer system can utilise it to accomplish difficult problems. This research is an extensive survey of the knowledge representation techniques used in smart agriculture, and specifically in the urban agricultural domain. Relevant articles on the knowledge base are extracted from the retrieved set to study the fulfillment of the criteria of the system. Various interesting findings were observed after the review. Spatial–temporal characteristics were rarely approached. A generalised representation technique to include all domains in agriculture is another issue. Finally, proper validation technique is found to be missing in such an ontology.

Suggested Citation

  • Bikram Pratim Bhuyan & Ravi Tomar & Amar Ramdane Cherif, 2022. "A Systematic Review of Knowledge Representation Techniques in Smart Agriculture (Urban)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-36, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:22:p:15249-:d:975366
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/22/15249/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/22/15249/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Defne Sunguroğlu Hensel, 2020. "Ecological Prototypes: Initiating Design Innovation in Green Construction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-17, July.
    2. Ramesh Sharda & Steve H. Barr & James C. McDonnell, 1988. "Decision Support System Effectiveness: A Review and an Empirical Test," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 34(2), pages 139-159, February.
    3. Mohsen Farhangi & Sara Farhangi & Paulien C. H. van de Vlasakker & Gerrit J. Carsjens, 2021. "The Role of Urban Agriculture Technologies in Transformation toward Participatory Local Urban Planning in Rafsanjan," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-30, August.
    4. Mohsen H. Farhangi & Margherita E. Turvani & Arnold van der Valk & Gerrit J. Carsjens, 2020. "High-Tech Urban Agriculture in Amsterdam: An Actor Network Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-35, May.
    5. Rachel Mazac & Hanna L. Tuomisto, 2020. "The Post-Anthropocene Diet: Navigating Future Diets for Sustainable Food Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-15, March.
    6. Mohsen Hosseinifarhangi & Margherita E. Turvani & Arnold van der Valk & Gerrit J. Carsjens, 2019. "Technology-Driven Transition in Urban Food Production Practices: A Case Study of Shanghai," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-31, November.
    7. Constantin Bratianu & Dan Florin Stanescu & Rares Mocanu & Ruxandra Bejinaru, 2021. "Serial Multiple Mediation of the Impact of Customer Knowledge Management on Sustainable Product Innovation by Innovative Work Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-25, November.
    8. Adebayo Adewumi Abayomi-Alli & Oluwasefunmi 'Tale Arogundade & Sanjay Misra & Mulkah Opeyemi Akala & Abiodun Motunrayo Ikotun & Bolanle Adefowoke Ojokoh, 2021. "An Ontology-Based Information Extraction System for Organic Farming," International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems (IJSWIS), IGI Global, vol. 17(2), pages 79-99, April.
    9. Wu, Zhan, 1979. "The Development of Socialist Agriculture in China," 1979 Conference, September 3-12, 1979, Banff, Canada 182390, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    10. Omar Adjali & Amar Ramdane-Cherif, 2017. "Knowledge Processing Using EKRL for Robotic Applications," International Journal of Cognitive Informatics and Natural Intelligence (IJCINI), IGI Global, vol. 11(4), pages 1-21, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bikram Pratim Bhuyan & Ravi Tomar & T. P. Singh & Amar Ramdane Cherif, 2022. "Crop Type Prediction: A Statistical and Machine Learning Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    2. Olga Mapanje & Selma Karuaihe & Charles Machethe & Mao Amis, 2023. "Financing Sustainable Agriculture in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Review of the Role of Financial Technologies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-20, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mohsen Farhangi & Sara Farhangi & Paulien C. H. van de Vlasakker & Gerrit J. Carsjens, 2021. "The Role of Urban Agriculture Technologies in Transformation toward Participatory Local Urban Planning in Rafsanjan," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-30, August.
    2. Ye Tian & Qin Liu & Yiting Ye & Zhaofang Zhang & Ribesh Khanal, 2023. "How the Rural Digital Economy Drives Rural Industrial Revitalization—Case Study of China’s 30 Provinces," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-18, April.
    3. Patrick Krieger & Carsten Lausberg, 2021. "Entscheidungen, Entscheidungsfindung und Entscheidungsunterstützung in der Immobilienwirtschaft: Eine systematische Literaturübersicht [Decisions, decision-making and decisions support systems in r," Zeitschrift für Immobilienökonomie (German Journal of Real Estate Research), Springer;Gesellschaft für Immobilienwirtschaftliche Forschung e. V., vol. 7(1), pages 1-33, April.
    4. Anna Zaręba & Alicja Krzemińska & Renata Kozik, 2021. "Urban Vertical Farming as an Example of Nature-Based Solutions Supporting a Healthy Society Living in the Urban Environment," Resources, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-18, October.
    5. Gelderman, Maarten, 1997. "Task difficulty, task variability and satisfaction with management support systems: consequences and solutions ˜," Serie Research Memoranda 0053, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    6. Yu-Hsien Lin, 2022. "Determinants of Green Purchase Intention: The Roles of Green Enjoyment, Green Intrinsic Motivation, and Green Brand Love," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-20, December.
    7. Mi, Hwang, 1998. "Did Task Type Matter in the Use of Decision Room GSS? A Critical Review and a Meta-analysis," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 1-15, February.
    8. Marie Davidová, 2021. "Breathing Artifacts of Urban BioClimatic Layers for Post-Anthropocene Urban Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-36, October.
    9. Salo, Ahti A., 1995. "Interactive decision aiding for group decision support," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 84(1), pages 134-149, July.
    10. Norbert Koppenhagen & Benjamin Mueller & Alexander Maedche & Ye Li & Stephanie Hiller, 2016. "Designing a supply network artifact for data, process, and people integration," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 613-636, August.
    11. Gelderman, M., 1995. "Factors affecting the success of management support systems: analysis and meta-analysis," Serie Research Memoranda 0020, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    12. Phillips-Wren, G. & Mora, M. & Forgionne, G.A. & Gupta, J.N.D., 2009. "An integrative evaluation framework for intelligent decision support systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 195(3), pages 642-652, June.
    13. Muhammad Mushahid Anwar & Juergen H. Breuste & Ayaz Ahmad & Asad Aziz & Ali Abdullah Aldosari, 2023. "Quantifying the Impacts of Urbanization on Urban Agriculture and Food Security in the Megacity Lahore, Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-13, August.
    14. Alex Richardson & Shirley Gregor & Richard Heaney, 2012. "Using decision support to manage the influence of cognitive abilities on share trading performance," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 37(3), pages 523-541, December.
    15. Nicola Capuano & Pasquale Foggia & Luca Greco & Pierluigi Ritrovato, 2022. "A Semantic Framework Supporting Multilayer Networks Analysis for Rare Diseases," International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems (IJSWIS), IGI Global, vol. 18(1), pages 1-22, January.
    16. Valencia Torres, Angélica & Tiwari, Chetan & Atkinson, Samuel F., 2021. "Progress in ecosystem services research: A guide for scholars and practitioners," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    17. Lu, Hsi-Peng & Yu, Huei-Ju & Lu, Simon S. K., 2001. "The effects of cognitive style and model type on DSS acceptance: An empirical study," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 131(3), pages 649-663, June.
    18. Derk Jan Stobbelaar & Wim van der Knaap & Joop Spijker, 2022. "Transformation towards Green Cities: Key Conditions to Accelerate Change," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-16, May.
    19. Leeuwen, Jerry van & Heijden, Hans van der & Kronsteiner, Reinhard, 2003. "Group Decision Support for Resource Allocation Decisions in Three-Person Groups," Serie Research Memoranda 0025, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    20. Anthony William Bennett & Simone Müller Loose, 2024. "User-Centered Development of an Online Dashboard Tool for Economic Sustainability for Small and Medium Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-24, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:22:p:15249-:d:975366. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.