IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i21p13739-d951285.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Study of Artificial Neural Network and Random Forest Model for Susceptibility Assessment of Landslides Induced by Earthquake in the Western Sichuan Plateau, China

Author

Listed:
  • Mustafa Kamal

    (College of Geography and Environment, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250014, China)

  • Baolei Zhang

    (College of Geography and Environment, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250014, China)

  • Jianfei Cao

    (College of Geography and Environment, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250014, China)

  • Xin Zhang

    (College of Geography and Environment, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250014, China)

  • Jun Chang

    (College of Geography and Environment, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250014, China)

Abstract

Earthquake-induced landslides are one of the most dangerous secondary disasters in mountainous areas throughout the world. The nowcasting of coseismic landslides is crucial for planning land management, development, and urbanization in mountainous areas. Taking Wenchuan County in Western Sichuan Plateau (WPS) as the study area, a landslide inventory was built using historical records. Herein, eight causative factors were selected for a library of factors, and then a landslide susceptibility assessment (LSA) was performed based on the machine learning techniques of Random Forest (RF) and Artificial Neural Network (ANN) models, respectively. The prediction abilities of the above two LSM models were assessed using the area under curve (AUC) value of the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve, precision, recall ratio, accuracy, and specificity. The performances of both machine learning techniques were found to be excellent, but RF outperformed in accuracy. There were still some differences between the models’ performances shown by the results: RF (AUC = 0.966) outperformed ANN (AUC = 0.914). The RF model demonstrated a higher degree of correlation between the areas classified as very low and high susceptibility in comparison to the ANN model. The results provided a theoretical framework upon which machine learning applications could be applied (e.g., RF and ANN), a reliable and low-cost tool to assess landslide susceptibility. This comparative study will provide a useful description of earthquake-induced landslides in the study area, which can be used to anticipate the features of landslides in the future, and have played a very important role in proper anthropogenic activities, resource management, and infrastructural development of the mountainous areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Mustafa Kamal & Baolei Zhang & Jianfei Cao & Xin Zhang & Jun Chang, 2022. "Comparative Study of Artificial Neural Network and Random Forest Model for Susceptibility Assessment of Landslides Induced by Earthquake in the Western Sichuan Plateau, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-14, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:21:p:13739-:d:951285
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/21/13739/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/21/13739/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yue Wang & Deliang Sun & Haijia Wen & Hong Zhang & Fengtai Zhang, 2020. "Comparison of Random Forest Model and Frequency Ratio Model for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping (LSM) in Yunyang County (Chongqing, China)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-39, June.
    2. Kamila Hodasová & Martin Bednarik, 2021. "Effect of using various weighting methods in a process of landslide susceptibility assessment," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 105(1), pages 481-499, January.
    3. Thomas Stanley & Dalia B. Kirschbaum, 2017. "A heuristic approach to global landslide susceptibility mapping," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 87(1), pages 145-164, May.
    4. Weidong Wang & Zhuolei He & Zheng Han & Yange Li & Jie Dou & Jianling Huang, 2020. "Mapping the susceptibility to landslides based on the deep belief network: a case study in Sichuan Province, China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 103(3), pages 3239-3261, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jiakai Lu & Chao Ren & Weiting Yue & Ying Zhou & Xiaoqin Xue & Yuanyuan Liu & Cong Ding, 2023. "Investigation of Landslide Susceptibility Decision Mechanisms in Different Ensemble-Based Machine Learning Models with Various Types of Factor Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-49, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bo Cao & Qingyi Li & Yuhang Zhu, 2022. "Comparison of Effects between Different Weight Calculation Methods for Improving Regional Landslide Susceptibility—A Case Study from Xingshan County of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-15, September.
    2. Rui-Xuan Tang & E-Chuan Yan & Tao Wen & Xiao-Meng Yin & Wei Tang, 2021. "Comparison of Logistic Regression, Information Value, and Comprehensive Evaluating Model for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-25, March.
    3. Okoli Jude Emeka & Haslinda Nahazanan & Bahareh Kalantar & Zailani Khuzaimah & Ojogbane Success Sani, 2021. "Evaluation of the Effect of Hydroseeded Vegetation for Slope Reinforcement," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-23, September.
    4. Fhatuwani Sengani & François Mulenga, 2020. "Application of Limit Equilibrium Analysis and Numerical Modeling in a Case of Slope Instability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-33, October.
    5. Deborah Simon Mwakapesa & Yimin Mao & Xiaoji Lan & Yaser Ahangari Nanehkaran, 2023. "Landslide Susceptibility Mapping Using DIvisive ANAlysis (DIANA) and RObust Clustering Using linKs (ROCK) Algorithms, and Comparison of Their Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-20, February.
    6. Lu Fang & Qian Wang & Jianping Yue & Yin Xing, 2023. "Analysis of Optimal Buffer Distance for Linear Hazard Factors in Landslide Susceptibility Prediction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-17, June.
    7. Mohammad Mehrabi, 2022. "Landslide susceptibility zonation using statistical and machine learning approaches in Northern Lecco, Italy," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 111(1), pages 901-937, March.
    8. Tingyu Zhang & Quan Fu & Chao Li & Fangfang Liu & Huanyuan Wang & Ling Han & Renata Pacheco Quevedo & Tianqing Chen & Na Lei, 2022. "Modeling landslide susceptibility using data mining techniques of kernel logistic regression, fuzzy unordered rule induction algorithm, SysFor and random forest," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 114(3), pages 3327-3358, December.
    9. Amit Bera & Bhabani Prasad Mukhopadhyay & Debasish Das, 2019. "Landslide hazard zonation mapping using multi-criteria analysis with the help of GIS techniques: a case study from Eastern Himalayas, Namchi, South Sikkim," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 96(2), pages 935-959, March.
    10. Chonghao Zhu & Jianjing Zhang & Yang Liu & Donghua Ma & Mengfang Li & Bo Xiang, 2020. "Comparison of GA-BP and PSO-BP neural network models with initial BP model for rainfall-induced landslides risk assessment in regional scale: a case study in Sichuan, China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 100(1), pages 173-204, January.
    11. Jiakai Lu & Chao Ren & Weiting Yue & Ying Zhou & Xiaoqin Xue & Yuanyuan Liu & Cong Ding, 2023. "Investigation of Landslide Susceptibility Decision Mechanisms in Different Ensemble-Based Machine Learning Models with Various Types of Factor Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-49, September.
    12. Helen Cristina Dias & Marcelo Fischer Gramani & Carlos Henrique Grohmann & Carlos Bateira & Bianca Carvalho Vieira, 2021. "Statistical-based shallow landslide susceptibility assessment for a tropical environment: a case study in the southeastern Brazilian coast," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 108(1), pages 205-223, August.
    13. Yulin Chen & Enze Chen & Jun Zhang & Jingxuan Zhu & Yuanyuan Xiao & Qiang Dai, 2023. "Investigation of Model Uncertainty in Rainfall-Induced Landslide Prediction under Changing Climate Conditions," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-16, September.
    14. Xiaoyi Wu & Yuanbao Song & Wei Chen & Guichuan Kang & Rui Qu & Zhifei Wang & Jiaxian Wang & Pengyi Lv & Han Chen, 2023. "Analysis of Geological Hazard Susceptibility of Landslides in Muli County Based on Random Forest Algorithm," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-17, February.
    15. Tahir Ali Akbar & Siddique Ullah & Waheed Ullah & Rafi Ullah & Raja Umer Sajjad & Abdullah Mohamed & Alamgir Khalil & Muhammad Faisal Javed & Anwarud Din, 2022. "Development and Application of Models for Landslide Hazards in Northern Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-17, August.
    16. Derly Gómez & Edwin F. García & Edier Aristizábal, 2023. "Spatial and temporal landslide distributions using global and open landslide databases," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 117(1), pages 25-55, May.
    17. Huang, Xiaoxun & Hayashi, Kiichiro & Fujii, Minoru & Villa, Ferdinando & Yamazaki, Yuri & Okazawa, Hiromu, 2023. "Identification of potential locations for small hydropower plant based on resources time footprint: A case study in Dan River Basin, China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 293-304.
    18. Edris Alam & Fahim Sufi & Abu Reza Md. Towfiqul Islam, 2023. "A Scenario-Based Case Study: Using AI to Analyze Casualties from Landslides in Chittagong Metropolitan Area, Bangladesh," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-20, March.
    19. Xianmin Wang & Xinlong Zhang & Jia Bi & Xudong Zhang & Shiqiang Deng & Zhiwei Liu & Lizhe Wang & Haixiang Guo, 2022. "Landslide Susceptibility Evaluation Based on Potential Disaster Identification and Ensemble Learning," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-26, October.
    20. Jae-Hyeon Park & Seong-Gyun Park & Hyun Kim, 2022. "Applicability Evaluation of Landslide Vulnerability Criteria for Decision on Landcreep-Vulnerable Areas in South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-16, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:21:p:13739-:d:951285. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.