IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v10y2021i10p995-d640222.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of the Effect of Hydroseeded Vegetation for Slope Reinforcement

Author

Listed:
  • Okoli Jude Emeka

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Malaysia)

  • Haslinda Nahazanan

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Malaysia)

  • Bahareh Kalantar

    (RIKEN Center for Advanced Intelligence Project, Goal-Oriented Technology Research Group, Disaster Resilience Science Team, Tokyo 103-0027, Japan)

  • Zailani Khuzaimah

    (Institute of Plantation Studies, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Malaysia)

  • Ojogbane Success Sani

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Malaysia)

Abstract

A landslide is a significant environmental hazard that results in an enormous loss of lives and properties. Studies have revealed that rainfall, soil characteristics, and human errors, such as deforestation, are the leading causes of landslides, reducing soil water infiltration and increasing the water runoff of a slope. This paper introduces vegetation establishment as a low-cost, practical measure for slope reinforcement through the ground cover and the root of the vegetation. This study reveals the level of complexity of the terrain with regards to the evaluation of high and low stability areas and has produced a landslide susceptibility map. For this purpose, 12 conditioning factors, namely slope, aspect, elevation, curvature, hill shade, stream power index (SPI), topographic wetness index (TWI), terrain roughness index (TRI), distances to roads, distance to lakes, distance to trees, and build-up, were used through the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) model to produce landslide susceptibility map. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) was used for validation of the results. The area under the curve (AUC) values obtained from the ROC method for the AHP model was 0.865. Four seed samples, namely ryegrass, rye corn, signal grass, and couch, were hydroseeded to determine the vegetation root and ground cover’s effectiveness on stabilization and reinforcement on a high-risk susceptible 65° slope between August and December 2020. The observed monthly vegetation root of couch grass gave the most acceptable result. With a spreading and creeping vegetation ground cover characteristic, ryegrass showed the most acceptable monthly result for vegetation ground cover effectiveness. The findings suggest that the selection of couch species over other species is justified based on landslide control benefits.

Suggested Citation

  • Okoli Jude Emeka & Haslinda Nahazanan & Bahareh Kalantar & Zailani Khuzaimah & Ojogbane Success Sani, 2021. "Evaluation of the Effect of Hydroseeded Vegetation for Slope Reinforcement," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-23, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:10:p:995-:d:640222
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/10/995/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/10/995/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maher Maalouf, 2011. "Logistic regression in data analysis: an overview," International Journal of Data Analysis Techniques and Strategies, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 3(3), pages 281-299.
    2. H. A. Nefeslioglu & E. Sezer & C. Gokceoglu & A. S. Bozkir & T. Y. Duman, 2010. "Assessment of Landslide Susceptibility by Decision Trees in the Metropolitan Area of Istanbul, Turkey," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2010, pages 1-15, February.
    3. Siyuan Wang & Minmin Zhao & Xingmin Meng & Guan Chen & Runqiang Zeng & Qiang Yang & Yi Liu & Biao Wang, 2020. "Evaluation of the Effects of Forest on Slope Stability and Its Implications for Forest Management: A Case Study of Bailong River Basin, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-17, August.
    4. Thomas Stanley & Dalia B. Kirschbaum, 2017. "A heuristic approach to global landslide susceptibility mapping," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 87(1), pages 145-164, May.
    5. Emmanouil Psomiadis & Andreas Papazachariou & Konstantinos X. Soulis & Despoina-Simoni Alexiou & Ioannis Charalampopoulos, 2020. "Landslide Mapping and Susceptibility Assessment Using Geospatial Analysis and Earth Observation Data," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-26, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ehtesham Mehmood & Imtiaz Rashid & Farooq Ahmed & Khalid Farooq & Akbar Tufail & Ahmed M. Ebid, 2022. "Hydrogeotechnical Predictive Approach for Rockfall Mountain Hazard Using Elastic Modulus and Peak Shear Stress at Soil–Rock Interface in Dry and Wet Phases at KKH Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-15, December.
    2. Enrico Miccadei & Cristiano Carabella & Giorgio Paglia, 2022. "Landslide Hazard and Environment Risk Assessment," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-5, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jie Liu & Zhen Wu & Huiwen Zhang, 2021. "Analysis of Changes in Landslide Susceptibility according to Land Use over 38 Years in Lixian County, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-23, September.
    2. Tahir Ali Akbar & Siddique Ullah & Waheed Ullah & Rafi Ullah & Raja Umer Sajjad & Abdullah Mohamed & Alamgir Khalil & Muhammad Faisal Javed & Anwarud Din, 2022. "Development and Application of Models for Landslide Hazards in Northern Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-17, August.
    3. Amgad Muneer & Suliman Mohamed Fati, 2020. "A Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Techniques for Cyberbullying Detection on Twitter," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-20, October.
    4. Derly Gómez & Edwin F. García & Edier Aristizábal, 2023. "Spatial and temporal landslide distributions using global and open landslide databases," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 117(1), pages 25-55, May.
    5. Huang, Xiaoxun & Hayashi, Kiichiro & Fujii, Minoru & Villa, Ferdinando & Yamazaki, Yuri & Okazawa, Hiromu, 2023. "Identification of potential locations for small hydropower plant based on resources time footprint: A case study in Dan River Basin, China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 293-304.
    6. Christos Polykretis & Manolis G. Grillakis & Athanasios V. Argyriou & Nikos Papadopoulos & Dimitrios D. Alexakis, 2021. "Integrating Multivariate (GeoDetector) and Bivariate (IV) Statistics for Hybrid Landslide Susceptibility Modeling: A Case of the Vicinity of Pinios Artificial Lake, Ilia, Greece," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-23, September.
    7. Bo Cao & Qingyi Li & Yuhang Zhu, 2022. "Comparison of Effects between Different Weight Calculation Methods for Improving Regional Landslide Susceptibility—A Case Study from Xingshan County of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-15, September.
    8. Mustafa Kamal & Baolei Zhang & Jianfei Cao & Xin Zhang & Jun Chang, 2022. "Comparative Study of Artificial Neural Network and Random Forest Model for Susceptibility Assessment of Landslides Induced by Earthquake in the Western Sichuan Plateau, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-14, October.
    9. Edris Alam & Fahim Sufi & Abu Reza Md. Towfiqul Islam, 2023. "A Scenario-Based Case Study: Using AI to Analyze Casualties from Landslides in Chittagong Metropolitan Area, Bangladesh," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-20, March.
    10. Sumita, Kazuto & Nakazawa, Katsuyoshi & Kawase, Akihiro, 2021. "Long-term care facilities and migration of elderly households in an aged society: Empirical analysis based on micro data," Journal of Housing Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    11. Jae-Hyeon Park & Seong-Gyun Park & Hyun Kim, 2022. "Applicability Evaluation of Landslide Vulnerability Criteria for Decision on Landcreep-Vulnerable Areas in South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-16, April.
    12. Asmita Ahmad & Meutia Farida & Nirmala Juita & Muh Jayadi, 2023. "Soil micromorphology for modeling spatial on landslide susceptibility mapping: a case study in Kelara Subwatershed, Jeneponto Regency of South Sulawesi, Indonesia," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 118(2), pages 1445-1462, September.
    13. Richard Mind’je & Lanhai Li & Jean Baptiste Nsengiyumva & Christophe Mupenzi & Enan Muhire Nyesheja & Patient Mindje Kayumba & Aboubakar Gasirabo & Egide Hakorimana, 2020. "Landslide susceptibility and influencing factors analysis in Rwanda," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(8), pages 7985-8012, December.
    14. Fhatuwani Sengani & François Mulenga, 2020. "Application of Limit Equilibrium Analysis and Numerical Modeling in a Case of Slope Instability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-33, October.
    15. Sheela Bhuvanendran Bhagya & Anita Saji Sumi & Sankaran Balaji & Jean Homian Danumah & Romulus Costache & Ambujendran Rajaneesh & Ajayakumar Gokul & Chandini Padmanabhapanicker Chandrasenan & Renata P, 2023. "Landslide Susceptibility Assessment of a Part of the Western Ghats (India) Employing the AHP and F-AHP Models and Comparison with Existing Susceptibility Maps," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-29, February.
    16. Sudatta Wadadar & Bhabani Prasad Mukhopadhyay, 2022. "GIS-based landslide susceptibility zonation and comparative analysis using analytical hierarchy process and conventional weighting-based multivariate statistical methods in the Lachung River Basin, No," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 113(2), pages 1199-1236, September.
    17. Qigen Lin & Ying Wang & Thomas Glade & Jiahui Zhang & Yue Zhang, 2020. "Assessing the spatiotemporal impact of climate change on event rainfall characteristics influencing landslide occurrences based on multiple GCM projections in China," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 162(2), pages 761-779, September.
    18. Mohammad Mehrabi, 2022. "Landslide susceptibility zonation using statistical and machine learning approaches in Northern Lecco, Italy," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 111(1), pages 901-937, March.
    19. Stephen R. Sobie, 2020. "Future changes in precipitation-caused landslide frequency in British Columbia," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 162(2), pages 465-484, September.
    20. Carmen Patino-Alonso & Marta Gómez-Sánchez & Leticia Gómez-Sánchez & Benigna Sánchez Salgado & Emiliano Rodríguez-Sánchez & Luis García-Ortiz & Manuel A. Gómez-Marcos, 2022. "Predictive Ability of Machine-Learning Methods for Vitamin D Deficiency Prediction by Anthropometric Parameters," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-16, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:10:p:995-:d:640222. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.