IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i20p13139-d941248.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Life Cycle Assessment of Management Scenarios for Dredged Sediments: Environmental Impacts Caused during Landfilling and Soil Conditioning

Author

Listed:
  • Laura Ferrans

    (Department of Biology and Environmental Science, Linnaeus University, Norrakajplan 6, 39231 Kalmar, Sweden)

  • Alexander Nilsson

    (Department of Biology and Environmental Science, Linnaeus University, Norrakajplan 6, 39231 Kalmar, Sweden)

  • Frank Schmieder

    (Department of Biology and Environmental Science, Linnaeus University, Norrakajplan 6, 39231 Kalmar, Sweden)

  • Divya Pal

    (Department of Biology and Environmental Science, Linnaeus University, Norrakajplan 6, 39231 Kalmar, Sweden)

  • Mahboubeh Rahmati-Abkenar

    (Stockholm Environment Institute, Linnégatan 87D, 11523 Stockholm, Sweden)

  • Marcia Marques

    (Department of Sanitary & Environmental Engineering, Rio de Janeiro State University-UERJ, Rua São Francisco Xavier, 524, Maracanã, Rio de Janeiro CEP 20550-900, Brazil)

  • William Hogland

    (Department of Biology and Environmental Science, Linnaeus University, Norrakajplan 6, 39231 Kalmar, Sweden)

Abstract

The management of dredged sediments is a challenging issue since it involves the interconnection of complex economic, social, technical and environmental aspects. The EU LIFE SURE project aimed to apply a more sustainable dredging technique to Malmfjärden Bay in Kalmar/Sweden (a shallow urban water body with a high content of nutrients) and, additionally, it involved beneficial uses for the dredged material, in line with the circular economy concept. To achieve this, a life cycle assessment (LCA) study was carried out to assess the potential environmental impacts associated with two scenarios: sediment landfilling (S1) and soil conditioning (S2). This LCA study also aimed to evaluate and compare the costs related to each scenario. S1 contemplated the construction and operation of the landfill for 100 years, including the collection and discharge of leachate and biogas. S2 included the use of sediments in soils and the avoidance of producing and using fertilisers. Results showed that (S2) soil conditioning (total impact: −6.4 PE) was the scenario with fewer environmental impacts and the best economic evaluation. The S2 scenario was mainly related to the positive environmental savings produced by reducing fertiliser consumption (which also avoided purchase costs). However, S2 was also linked to potential negative effects associated with eutrophication and toxicity categories of impacts due to the possible spread of nutrients and pollutants in terrestrial and aquatic environments. In order to mitigate this problem, the sediments could be pre-treated to reduce their risk of pollution. Moreover, the main impact of the landfilling scenario (S1, total impact: 1.6 PE) was the emission of global warming-contributing gases during the operation of the facility. Implementing the soil conditioning scenario was therefore recommended, in line with the aim of the LIFE SURE project. Finally, it was recommended that LCA studies should be applied more often in the future when selecting beneficial uses for dredged sediments. The decision-making process is facilitated when the positive and negative impacts produced by each handling option are considered.

Suggested Citation

  • Laura Ferrans & Alexander Nilsson & Frank Schmieder & Divya Pal & Mahboubeh Rahmati-Abkenar & Marcia Marques & William Hogland, 2022. "Life Cycle Assessment of Management Scenarios for Dredged Sediments: Environmental Impacts Caused during Landfilling and Soil Conditioning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-17, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:20:p:13139-:d:941248
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/20/13139/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/20/13139/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Francesco Pasciucco & Isabella Pecorini & Simona Di Gregorio & Fabiano Pilato & Renato Iannelli, 2021. "Recovery Strategies of Contaminated Marine Sediments: A Life Cycle Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-19, July.
    2. Giancarlo Renella, 2021. "Recycling and Reuse of Sediments in Agriculture: Where Is the Problem?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-12, February.
    3. Maria Luiza F. M. Kede & Fabio V. Correia & Paulo F. Conceição & Sidney F. Salles Junior & Marcia Marques & Josino C. Moreira & Daniel V. Pérez, 2014. "Evaluation of Mobility, Bioavailability and Toxicity of Pb and Cd in Contaminated Soil Using TCLP, BCR and Earthworms," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-13, November.
    4. Venkata Ravi Sankar Cheela & Michele John & Wahidul K. Biswas & Brajesh Dubey, 2021. "Environmental Impact Evaluation of Current Municipal Solid Waste Treatments in India Using Life Cycle Assessment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-23, May.
    5. Asma Majeed & Syeda Adila Batool & Muhammad Nawaz Chaudhry, 2018. "Environmental Quantification of the Existing Waste Management System in a Developing World Municipality Using EaseTech: The Case of Bahawalpur, Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-22, July.
    6. Pilar Legua & Francisca Hernández & Francesca Tozzi & Rafael Martínez-Font & David Jorquera & Caridad Rosique Jiménez & Edgardo Giordani & Juan José Martínez-Nicolás & Pablo Melgarejo, 2021. "Application of LCA Methodology to the Production of Strawberry on Substrates with Peat and Sediments from Ports," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-12, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Keith Torrance & Richard Alastair Lord & Alasdair Hamilton & Paul Berry, 2023. "Repurposing Dredged Canal Sediment for Topsoil at Bowling, Scotland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-12, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Amit Kumar Jaglan & Venkata Ravi Sankar Cheela & Mansi Vinaik & Brajesh Dubey, 2022. "Environmental Impact Evaluation of University Integrated Waste Management System in India Using Life Cycle Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-18, July.
    2. Tanzila Akmal & Faisal Jamil, 2021. "Testing the Role of Waste Management and Environmental Quality on Health Indicators Using Structural Equation Modeling in Pakistan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-11, April.
    3. Chang Lei & Hao Huang & Haoxin Ye & Zhiping Fu & Peipei Peng & Shaoqing Zhang & Laishou Long, 2022. "Immobilization of Pb and Zn in Contaminated Soil Using Alumina–Silica Nano-Amendments Synthesized from Coal Fly Ash," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-13, December.
    4. Alessio Castagnoli & Francesco Pasciucco & Renato Iannelli & Carlo Meoni & Isabella Pecorini, 2022. "Keu Contamination in Tuscany: The Life Cycle Assessment of Remediation Project as a Decision Support Tool for Local Administration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-15, November.
    5. Hessampour, Reza & Bastani, Aboubakr & Hassani, Mehrdad & Failla, Sabina & Vaverková, Magdalena Daria & Halog, Anthony, 2023. "Joint life cycle assessment and data envelopment analysis for the benchmarking of energy, exergy, environmental effects, and water footprint in the canned apple supply chain," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    6. Khatri, Krishan Lal & Muhammad, Amir Raza & Soomro, Shakir Ali & Tunio, Nadeem Ahmed & Ali, Muhammad Mubarak, 2021. "Investigation of possible solid waste power potential for distributed generation development to overcome the power crises of Karachi city," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    7. Wendy Tatiana González Cano & Kyoungrean Kim, 2022. "How to Achieve Sustainably Beneficial Uses of Marine Sediments in Colombia?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-13, November.
    8. Xuexia Huang & Dinggui Luo & Xiangxin Chen & Lezhang Wei & Yu Liu & Qihang Wu & Tangfu Xiao & Xiaotao Mai & Guowei Liu & Lirong Liu, 2019. "Insights into Heavy Metals Leakage in Chelator-Induced Phytoextraction of Pb- and Tl-Contaminated Soil," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-14, April.
    9. Zhang, Ning & Zhang, Duo & Zuo, Jian & Miller, Travis R. & Duan, Huabo & Schiller, Georg, 2022. "Potential for CO2 mitigation and economic benefits from accelerated carbonation of construction and demolition waste," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    10. Nikafkar, Nasrin & Alroaia, Younos Vakil & Heydariyeh, Seyyed Abdollah & Schleiss, Anton J., 2023. "Economic and commercial analysis of reusing dam reservoir sediments," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 204(PB).
    11. Francesca Vannucchi & Cristina Macci & Serena Doni & Vincenzo Longo & Francesca Ugolini & Grazia Masciandaro & Eleonora Peruzzi, 2022. "Posidonia -Based Compost and Dredged Sediment in Growing Media Improve Tolerance and Nutrient Uptake in Ornamental Plants," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-14, November.
    12. Asif Iqbal & Yasar Abdullah & Abdul Sattar Nizami & Imran Ali Sultan & Faiza Sharif, 2022. "Assessment of Solid Waste Management System in Pakistan and Sustainable Model from Environmental and Economic Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-23, October.
    13. Muhammad Nawaz & Muhammad Tariq Yousafzai & Salim Khan & Wisal Ahmad & Muhammad Salman & Heesup Han & Antonio Ariza-Montes & Alejandro Vega-Muñoz, 2021. "Assessing the Formal and Informal Waste Recycling Business Processes through a Stakeholders Lens in Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-16, October.
    14. Oluwatobi Owojori & Joshua N. Edokpayi & Ratshalingwa Mulaudzi & John O. Odiyo, 2020. "Characterisation, Recovery and Recycling Potential of Solid Waste in a University of a Developing Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-17, June.
    15. Keith Torrance & Richard Alastair Lord & Alasdair Hamilton & Paul Berry, 2023. "Repurposing Dredged Canal Sediment for Topsoil at Bowling, Scotland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-12, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:20:p:13139-:d:941248. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.