IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i19p11843-d920081.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Explainable Risk Assessment of Rockbolts’ Failure in Underground Coal Mines Based on Categorical Gradient Boosting and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP)

Author

Listed:
  • Bemah Ibrahim

    (Department of Geological Engineering, University of Mines and Technology, Tarkwa P.O. Box 237, Ghana)

  • Isaac Ahenkorah

    (Rock Mechanics Engineer, WSP Golder, Northbridge, WA 6003, Australia)

  • Anthony Ewusi

    (Department of Geological Engineering, University of Mines and Technology, Tarkwa P.O. Box 237, Ghana)

Abstract

The occurrence of premature rockbolt failure in underground mines has remained one of the most serious challenges facing the industry over the years. Considering the complex mechanism of rockbolts’ failure and the large number of influencing factors, the prediction of rockbolts’ failure from laboratory testing may often be unreliable. It is therefore essential to develop new models capable of predicting rockbolts’ failure with high accuracy. Beyond the predictive accuracy, there is also the need to understand the decisions made by these models in order to convey trust and ensure safety, reliability, and accountability. In this regard, this study proposes an explainable risk assessment of rockbolts’ failure in an underground coal mine using the categorical gradient boosting (Catboost) algorithm and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP). A dataset (including geotechnical and environmental features) from a complex underground mining environment was used. The outcomes of this study indicated that the proposed Catboost algorithm gave an excellent prediction of the risk of rockbolts’ failure. Additionally, the SHAP interpretation revealed that the “length of roadway” was the main contributing factor to rockbolts’ failure. However, conditions influencing rockbolts’ failure varied at different locations in the mine. Overall, this study provides insights into the complex relationship between rockbolts’ failure and the influence of geotechnical and environmental variables. The transparency and explainability of the proposed approach have the potential to facilitate the adoption of explainable machine learning for rockbolt risk assessment in underground mines.

Suggested Citation

  • Bemah Ibrahim & Isaac Ahenkorah & Anthony Ewusi, 2022. "Explainable Risk Assessment of Rockbolts’ Failure in Underground Coal Mines Based on Categorical Gradient Boosting and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-16, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:19:p:11843-:d:920081
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/19/11843/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/19/11843/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peng Jiang & Peter Craig & Alan Crosky & Mojtaba Maghrebi & Ismet Canbulat & Serkan Saydam, 2018. "Risk assessment of failure of rock bolts in underground coal mines using support vector machines," Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(3), pages 293-304, May.
    2. Tianao Wu & Wei Zhang & Xiyun Jiao & Weihua Guo & Yousef Alhaj Hamoud, 2020. "Comparison of five Boosting-based models for estimating daily reference evapotranspiration with limited meteorological variables," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-28, June.
    3. Niaz Muhammad Shahani & Xigui Zheng & Xiaowei Guo & Xin Wei, 2022. "Machine Learning-Based Intelligent Prediction of Elastic Modulus of Rocks at Thar Coalfield," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-24, March.
    4. Peters, Jan & Baets, Bernard De & Verhoest, Niko E.C. & Samson, Roeland & Degroeve, Sven & Becker, Piet De & Huybrechts, Willy, 2007. "Random forests as a tool for ecohydrological distribution modelling," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 207(2), pages 304-318.
    5. Amad Ullah Khan & Saad Salman & Khan Muhammad & Mudassar Habib, 2022. "Modelling Coal Dust Explosibility of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Coal Using Random Forest Algorithm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-20, April.
    6. Zhang, Limao & Lin, Penghui, 2021. "Multi-objective optimization for limiting tunnel-induced damages considering uncertainties," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Galimzyanov, Bulat N. & Doronina, Maria A. & Mokshin, Anatolii V., 2023. "Machine learning-based prediction of elastic properties of amorphous metal alloys," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 617(C).
    2. Yikalo H. Araya & Tarmo K. Remmel & Ajith H. Perera, 2016. "What governs the presence of residual vegetation in boreal wildfires?," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 159-181, April.
    3. Sarah Mittlefehldt & Erin Bunting & Emily Huff & Joseph Welsh & Robert Goodwin, 2021. "New Methods for Assessing Sustainability of Wood-Burning Energy Facilities: Combining Historical and Spatial Approaches," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-18, November.
    4. Vanesa Mateo-Pérez & Marina Corral-Bobadilla & Francisco Ortega-Fernández & Vicente Rodríguez-Montequín, 2021. "Determination of Water Depth in Ports Using Satellite Data Based on Machine Learning Algorithms," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-22, April.
    5. Liu, Wenli & Li, Ang & Fang, Weili & Love, Peter E.D. & Hartmann, Timo & Luo, Hanbin, 2023. "A hybrid data-driven model for geotechnical reliability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    6. Zhang, Yan & Teoh, Bak Koon & Wu, Maozhi & Chen, Jiayu & Zhang, Limao, 2023. "Data-driven estimation of building energy consumption and GHG emissions using explainable artificial intelligence," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(PA).
    7. Jayashree T R & NV Subba Reddy & U Dinesh Acharya, 2023. "Modeling Daily Reference Evapotranspiration from Climate Variables: Assessment of Bagging and Boosting Regression Approaches," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 37(3), pages 1013-1032, February.
    8. Qu, Pengfei & Zhang, Limao & Zhu, Qizhi & Wu, Maozhi, 2023. "Probabilistic reliability assessment of twin tunnels considering fluid–solid coupling with physics-guided machine learning," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    9. Shuaiwei Shi & Meiyi Hou & Zifan Gu & Ce Jiang & Weiqiang Zhang & Mengyang Hou & Chenxi Li & Zenglei Xi, 2022. "Estimation of Heavy Metal Content in Soil Based on Machine Learning Models," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-19, July.
    10. Yeeun Shin & Suyeon Kim & Se-Rin Park & Taewoo Yi & Chulgoo Kim & Sang-Woo Lee & Kyungjin An, 2022. "Identifying Key Environmental Factors for Paulownia coreana Habitats: Implementing National On-Site Survey and Machine Learning Algorithms," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-16, April.
    11. Thomas J. Stohlgren & Peter Ma & Sunil Kumar & Monique Rocca & Jeffrey T. Morisette & Catherine S. Jarnevich & Nate Benson, 2010. "Ensemble Habitat Mapping of Invasive Plant Species," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(2), pages 224-235, February.
    12. Xiaohua Ding & Mehdi Jamei & Mahdi Hasanipanah & Rini Asnida Abdullah & Binh Nguyen Le, 2023. "Optimized Data-Driven Models for Prediction of Flyrock due to Blasting in Surface Mines," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-20, May.
    13. Musaab I. Magzoub & Raj Kiran & Saeed Salehi & Ibnelwaleed A. Hussein & Mustafa S. Nasser, 2021. "Assessing the Relation between Mud Components and Rheology for Loss Circulation Prevention Using Polymeric Gels: A Machine Learning Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-19, March.
    14. Niaz Muhammad Shahani & Barkat Ullah & Kausar Sultan Shah & Fawad Ul Hassan & Rashid Ali & Mohamed Abdelghany Elkotb & Mohamed E. Ghoneim & Elsayed M. Tag-Eldin, 2022. "Predicting Angle of Internal Friction and Cohesion of Rocks Based on Machine Learning Algorithms," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(20), pages 1-17, October.
    15. Marie-Hélène Roy & Denis Larocque, 2012. "Robustness of random forests for regression," Journal of Nonparametric Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(4), pages 993-1006, December.
    16. Olga Zhironkina & Sergey Zhironkin, 2023. "Technological and Intellectual Transition to Mining 4.0: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-37, February.
    17. Chen, Weiyi & Zhang, Limao, 2022. "An automated machine learning approach for earthquake casualty rate and economic loss prediction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    18. Zhi Yu & Chuanqi Li & Jian Zhou, 2023. "Tunnel Boring Machine Performance Prediction Using Supervised Learning Method and Swarm Intelligence Algorithm," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-16, October.
    19. Rossy Chumbe & Stefany Silva & Yvan Garcia, 2023. "Comparison of the machine learning and AquaCrop models for quinoa crops," Research in Agricultural Engineering, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 69(2), pages 65-75.
    20. Sachin Kumar & T. Gopi & N. Harikeerthana & Munish Kumar Gupta & Vidit Gaur & Grzegorz M. Krolczyk & ChuanSong Wu, 2023. "Machine learning techniques in additive manufacturing: a state of the art review on design, processes and production control," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 34(1), pages 21-55, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:19:p:11843-:d:920081. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.