IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i18p11164-d908259.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pathways to Greener Pastures: Research Opportunities to Integrate Life Cycle Assessment and Sustainable Business Process Management Based on a Systematic Tertiary Literature Review

Author

Listed:
  • Andreas Fritsch

    (Institute of Applied Informatics and Formal Description Methods, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, 76133 Karlsruhe, Germany)

  • Johanna von Hammerstein

    (Institute of Applied Informatics and Formal Description Methods, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, 76133 Karlsruhe, Germany)

  • Clemens Schreiber

    (Institute of Applied Informatics and Formal Description Methods, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, 76133 Karlsruhe, Germany)

  • Stefanie Betz

    (Faculty of Computer Science, Furtwangen University, 78120 Furtwangen, Germany)

  • Andreas Oberweis

    (Institute of Applied Informatics and Formal Description Methods, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, 76133 Karlsruhe, Germany)

Abstract

Sustainable Business Process Management (BPM) is a research field that aims to improve the sustainability performance of organizations’ operations. With its focus on business processes, it has the potential to bring sustainability considerations from external reporting to the core of organizations. We present a systematic tertiary literature study to provide a catalog of existing literature reviews and primary work and to give a consolidated overview of the state and research needs of the field. We find that Sustainable BPM research has focused on modeling approaches and most of the work so far is largely conceptual, with a limited sustainability perspective. Based on these findings, we propose an integration of BPM and Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), an established and rigorous method for sustainability analysis. We present research opportunities to show how both disciplines can synergize and leverage methods and techniques for business process automation and innovation to effectively improve the sustainability performance of organizations.

Suggested Citation

  • Andreas Fritsch & Johanna von Hammerstein & Clemens Schreiber & Stefanie Betz & Andreas Oberweis, 2022. "Pathways to Greener Pastures: Research Opportunities to Integrate Life Cycle Assessment and Sustainable Business Process Management Based on a Systematic Tertiary Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-20, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:18:p:11164-:d:908259
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/18/11164/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/18/11164/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul Harmon, 2015. "The Scope and Evolution of Business Process Management," International Handbooks on Information Systems, in: Jan vom Brocke & Michael Rosemann (ed.), Handbook on Business Process Management 1, edition 2, pages 37-80, Springer.
    2. Eva Heiskanen, 2000. "Managers' interpretations of LCA: enlightenment and responsibility or confusion and denial?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 9(4), pages 239-254, July.
    3. Michael Rosemann & Jan Brocke, 2015. "The Six Core Elements of Business Process Management," International Handbooks on Information Systems, in: Jan vom Brocke & Michael Rosemann (ed.), Handbook on Business Process Management 1, edition 2, pages 105-122, Springer.
    4. Michael Rosemann & Jan Brocke, 2010. "The Six Core Elements of Business Process Management," International Handbooks on Information Systems, in: Jan vom Brocke & Michael Rosemann (ed.), Handbook on Business Process Management 1, pages 107-122, Springer.
    5. Dries Couckuyt & Amy Van Looy, 2019. "Green BPM as a Business-Oriented Discipline: A Systematic Mapping Study and Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-22, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maha Syed Ibrahim & Aamer Hanif & Faheem Qaisar Jamal & Ali Ahsan, 2019. "Towards successful business process improvement – An extension of change acceleration process model," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(11), pages 1-20, November.
    2. Ralf Plattfaut, 2022. "On the Importance of Project Management Capabilities for Sustainable Business Process Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-12, June.
    3. Martin Lehnert & Alexander Linhart & Maximilian Röglinger, 2016. "Value-based process project portfolio management: integrated planning of BPM capability development and process improvement," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 9(2), pages 377-419, August.
    4. Tahir Ahmad & Amy Van Looy, 2020. "Business Process Management and Digital Innovations: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-30, August.
    5. T. Bartosz Kalinowski, 2020. "Business Process Maturity Models Research: A Systematic Literature Review," International Journal of Management Science and Business Administration, Inovatus Services Ltd., vol. 7(1), pages 29-35, November.
    6. Ingo Kregel & Bettina Distel & André Coners, 2022. "Business Process Management Culture in Public Administration and Its Determinants," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 64(2), pages 201-221, April.
    7. Birgit Brunklaus & Tove Malmqvist & Henrikke Baumann, 2009. "Managing stakeholders or the environment? The challenge of relating indicators in practice," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(1), pages 27-37, January.
    8. Anne Marie de Jonge, 2003. "Limited LCAs of pharmaceutical products: merits and limitations of an environmental management tool," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 10(2), pages 78-90, June.
    9. Pearce, Antony & Pons, Dirk & Neitzert, Thomas, 2018. "Implementing lean—Outcomes from SME case studies," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 5(C), pages 94-104.
    10. Pereira José Luís & e Sá Jorge Oliveira, 2017. "Process-Based Information Systems Development: Taking Advantage of a Component-Based Infrastructure," Business Systems Research, Sciendo, vol. 8(2), pages 71-83, September.
    11. Olga Pilipczuk, 2021. "Transformation of the Business Process Manager Profession in Poland: The Impact of Digital Technologies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-20, December.
    12. Marek Szelągowski, 2021. "Practical assessment of the nature of business processes," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 541-566, June.
    13. Sebastian Fredershausen & Henrik Lechte & Mathias Willnat & Tobias Witt & Christine Harnischmacher & Tim-Benjamin Lembcke & Matthias Klumpp & Lutz Kolbe, 2021. "Towards an Understanding of Hydrogen Supply Chains: A Structured Literature Review Regarding Sustainability Evaluation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-19, October.
    14. Diana COZMIUC, 2020. "Integrated Supply Chain Management Process Benchmarks For Global Business Services In Romania," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 14(1), pages 101-119, November.
    15. Todor Stoilov & Krasimira Stoilova, 2022. "An Algorithm for Business Management Based on Portfolio Optimization," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(22), pages 1-19, November.
    16. Aleksander Janes & Rajko Novak, 2017. "Process Maturity Orientation Measurement," MIC 2017: Managing the Global Economy; Proceedings of the Joint International Conference, Monastier di Treviso, Italy, 24–27 May 2017,, University of Primorska Press.
    17. Dusan Gosnik, 2019. "Core Business Process Management and Company Performance," Management, University of Primorska, Faculty of Management Koper, vol. 14(1), pages 59-86.
    18. Miroslava Nyulásziová & Dana Paľová, 2020. "Implementing a decision support system in the transport process management of a small Slovak transport company," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 16(1), pages 75-106.
    19. Katharina Stelzl & Maximilian Röglinger & Katrin Wyrtki, 2020. "Building an ambidextrous organization: a maturity model for organizational ambidexterity," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 13(3), pages 1203-1230, November.
    20. Vesna Bosilj Vuksic & Ljiljana Brkic & Katarina Tomicic-Pupek, 2018. "Understanding the Success Factors in Adopting Business Process Management Software: Case Studies," Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems - scientific journal, Croatian Interdisciplinary Society Provider Homepage: http://indecs.eu, vol. 16(2), pages 194-215.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:18:p:11164-:d:908259. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.