IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i14p8748-d865002.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Review on Sustainability Characteristics Development for Wooden Furniture Design

Author

Listed:
  • Mohd Effendi Muhammad Suandi

    (Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Technology, Universiti Malaysia Perlis, Arau 02600, Perlis, Malaysia
    Center of Excellence Geopolymer and Green Technology (CEGeoGTech), Universiti Malaysia Perlis, Kangar 01000, Perlis, Malaysia
    Faculty of Applied and Human Sciences, Universiti Malaysia Perlis (UniMAP), Kangar 01000, Perlis, Malaysia)

  • Mohammad Harith Amlus

    (Faculty of Applied and Human Sciences, Universiti Malaysia Perlis (UniMAP), Kangar 01000, Perlis, Malaysia)

  • Abdul Rahman Hemdi

    (Centre for Mechanical Engineering Studies, Universiti Teknologi Mara, Permatang Pauh Campus, Seberang Perai 13500, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia)

  • Shayfull Zamree Abd Rahim

    (Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Technology, Universiti Malaysia Perlis, Arau 02600, Perlis, Malaysia
    Center of Excellence Geopolymer and Green Technology (CEGeoGTech), Universiti Malaysia Perlis, Kangar 01000, Perlis, Malaysia)

  • Mohd Fathullah Ghazali

    (Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Technology, Universiti Malaysia Perlis, Arau 02600, Perlis, Malaysia
    Center of Excellence Geopolymer and Green Technology (CEGeoGTech), Universiti Malaysia Perlis, Kangar 01000, Perlis, Malaysia)

  • Nur Liza Rahim

    (Center of Excellence Geopolymer and Green Technology (CEGeoGTech), Universiti Malaysia Perlis, Kangar 01000, Perlis, Malaysia
    Faculty of Civil Engineering and Technology, Universiti Malaysia Perlis, Kangar 01000, Perlis, Malaysia)

Abstract

The design of furniture products is influenced by increasing consumer interest in green products and sustainability values. However, although the demand for sustainable furniture products is high, the standardization of sustainability characteristics in furniture design has still not been achieved. A thorough literature review was conducted, which considered various sustainability characteristics that apply in industries that design furniture. This review paper aimed to identify common sustainability characteristics so that a new standard for furniture industries can be established. In this review, numerous themes were explored relating to design guidelines, design criteria, design preferences, design optimization, design evaluation and assessment, design decision making, strategic planning, design strategies, the integration of eco-design, and eco-design tools. A total of 137 articles were reviewed regarding their sustainability characteristics according to the triple bottom-line framework for a relevant product sector. Due to the limited reports on the sustainability characteristics of furniture design activities, this paper also tried to include common sustainability characteristics of non-furniture products that are available on the market. Through the review, 10 sustainability characteristics were identified for the environment, 17 for the economy, and 16 for the social dimension as being common among manufacturers when designing their products. A further in-depth analysis was conducted by mapping the characteristics to those that were significantly implemented in the design process, of which five (5) were environmental, two (2) were economic, and five (5) were social sustainability characteristics. This review is significant in helping furniture designers to use appropriate and effective sustainability standards in the design and manufacture of products that meet customers’ demands. Previous literature reviews have not clearly measured the triple bottom line. Furthermore, no definite characteristics were proposed in previous works regarding wooden furniture design, leaving a gap to be closed by future works.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohd Effendi Muhammad Suandi & Mohammad Harith Amlus & Abdul Rahman Hemdi & Shayfull Zamree Abd Rahim & Mohd Fathullah Ghazali & Nur Liza Rahim, 2022. "A Review on Sustainability Characteristics Development for Wooden Furniture Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-56, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:14:p:8748-:d:865002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/14/8748/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/14/8748/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lucia Corsini & James Moultrie, 2019. "Design for Social Sustainability: Using Digital Fabrication in the Humanitarian and Development Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-20, June.
    2. Awanis Romli & Paul Prickett & Rossitza Setchi & Shwe Soe, 2015. "Integrated eco-design decision-making for sustainable product development," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(2), pages 549-571, January.
    3. Josiena Gotzsch, 2008. "Key aspects of product attraction: a focus on eco-friendliness," International Journal of Environmental Technology and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 8(1), pages 37-52.
    4. Malgorzata Koszewska & Maciej Bielecki, 2020. "How to make furniture industry more circular? The role of component standardisation in ready-to-assemble furniture," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 7(3), pages 1688-1707, March.
    5. Esther Hoffmann, 2007. "Consumer integration in sustainable product development," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 16(5), pages 322-338, July.
    6. Marica Barbaritano & Elisabetta Savelli, 2021. "How Consumer Environmental Responsibility Affects the Purchasing Intention of Design Furniture Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-18, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Elisabete Nogueira & Sofia Gomes & João M. Lopes, 2023. "Triple Bottom Line, Sustainability, and Economic Development: What Binds Them Together? A Bibliometric Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-17, April.
    2. Ling Zhu & Yuqi Yan & Jiufang Lv, 2023. "A Bibliometric Analysis of Current Knowledge Structure and Research Progress Related to Sustainable Furniture Design Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-27, May.
    3. Yikang Sun & Ching-Chiuan Yen & Tien-Li Chen, 2023. "Designing “Forest” into Daily Lives for Sustainability: A Case Study of Taiwanese Wooden Furniture Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-22, April.
    4. Wenxin Deng & Hong Lin & Mu Jiang, 2023. "Research on Bamboo Furniture Design Based on D4S (Design for Sustainability)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-17, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Quan-Jing & Wang, Hai-Jie & Chang, Chun-Ping, 2022. "Environmental performance, green finance and green innovation: What's the long-run relationships among variables?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    2. Anna Lewandowska & Zia Ullah & Fatima Saleh AlDhaen & Esra AlDhaen & Alina Yakymchuk, 2023. "Enhancing Organizational Social Sustainability: Exploring the Effect of Sustainable Leadership and the Moderating Role of Micro-Level CSR," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-16, August.
    3. Garrath T. Wilson & Tracy Bhamra, 2020. "Design for Sustainability: The Need for a New Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-8, April.
    4. Lara Alshawawreh & Francesco Pomponi & Bernardino D’Amico & Susan Snaddon & Peter Guthrie, 2020. "Qualifying the Sustainability of Novel Designs and Existing Solutions for Post-Disaster and Post-Conflict Sheltering," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-19, January.
    5. Andersén, Jim, 2021. "A relational natural-resource-based view on product innovation: The influence of green product innovation and green suppliers on differentiation advantage in small manufacturing firms," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    6. Paolo Morganti & Rosa Carolina Valdes, 2023. "The Perils of Asymmetrical Technological Changes in a Knowledge Economy with Complete Markets," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-17, August.
    7. Georgi V. Georgiev & Vijayakumar Nanjappan, 2023. "Sustainability Considerations in Digital Fabrication Design Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-15, January.
    8. Samuel Wicki & Erik G. Hansen, 2019. "Green technology innovation: Anatomy of exploration processes from a learning perspective," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(6), pages 970-988, September.
    9. Fan Chen & Sen Liu & Andrea Appolloni, 2020. "Horizontal Coordination of I-LNGOs in the Humanitarian Supply Chain: An Evolutionary Game Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-21, July.
    10. Junjun Liu & Yong Geng & Biao Chen & Xiqiang Xia, 2021. "The Effect of a Supplier’s Eco-Design on the Economic Benefits of a Supply Chain and Associated Coordination," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-18, December.
    11. Ammarn Sodawan & Robert Li-Wei Hsu, 2022. "Halal-Friendly Attributes and Muslims’ Visit Intention: Exploring the Roles of Perceived Value and Destination Trust," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-23, September.
    12. Wang, Jason X. & Burke, Haydn & Zhang, Abraham, 2022. "Overcoming barriers to circular product design," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    13. Jianfeng Wu & Chuchu Jin & Lekai Zhang & Li Zhang & Ming Li & Xuan Dong, 2021. "Emotionally Sustainable Design Toolbox: A Card-Based Design Tool for Designing Products with an Extended Life Based on the User’s Emotional Needs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-19, September.
    14. Noureddine Dahmani & Amine Belhadi & Khalid Benhida & Said Elfezazi & Fatima Ezahra Touriki & Yassine Azougagh, 2022. "Integrating lean design and eco-design to improve product design: From literature review to an operational framework," Energy & Environment, , vol. 33(1), pages 189-219, February.
    15. Fuisz-Kehrbach, Sonja-Katrin, 2015. "A three-dimensional framework to explore corporate sustainability activities in the mining industry: Current status and challenges ahead," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(P1), pages 101-115.
    16. Leslier Valenzuela-Fernández & Manuel Escobar-Farfán & Mauricio Guerra-Velásquez & Elizabeth Emperatriz García-Salirrosas, 2023. "COVID-19 Effects on Environmentally Responsible Behavior: A Social Impact Perspective from Latin American Countries," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-21, February.
    17. Fabio Neves Puglieri & Aldo Roberto Ometto & Rodrigo Salvador & Murillo Vetroni Barros & Cassiano Moro Piekarski & Izabella Morré Rodrigues & Octavio Diegoli Netto, 2020. "An Environmental and Operational Analysis of Quality Function Deployment-Based Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-18, April.
    18. Verena Hermelingmeier & Timo von Wirth, 2021. "The nexus of business sustainability and organizational learning: A systematic literature review to identify key learning principles for business transformation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(4), pages 1839-1851, May.
    19. Jiawei Shi & Yan Zhou, 2022. "Group Decision Making for Product Innovation Based on PZB Model in Fuzzy Environment: A Case from New-Energy Storage Innovation Design," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(19), pages 1-26, October.
    20. Antreas Kantaros & Nikolaos Laskaris & Dimitrios Piromalis & Theodore Ganetsos, 2021. "Manufacturing Zero-Waste COVID-19 Personal Protection Equipment: a Case Study of Utilizing 3D Printing While Employing Waste Material Recycling," Circular Economy and Sustainability,, Springer.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:14:p:8748-:d:865002. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.