IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i10p5970-d815681.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Drivers, Barriers, and Strategies in the Community-Based Supply of Bamboo for Industrial-Scale Bamboo Utilization in Ngada Regency, East Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia

Author

Listed:
  • Desy Ekawati

    (Study Program of Natural Resource and Environmental Management Science, Graduate School, IPB University, Kampus IPB Baranangsiang, Bogor 16143, Indonesia
    Standardization Instrument of Environment and Forestry Agency, Ministry of Environment and Forestry, Bogor 16118, Indonesia)

  • Lina Karlinasari

    (Study Program of Natural Resource and Environmental Management Science, Graduate School, IPB University, Kampus IPB Baranangsiang, Bogor 16143, Indonesia
    Department of Forest Products, Faculty of Forestry and Environment, IPB University, Kampus IPB Darmaga, Bogor 16680, Indonesia)

  • Rinekso Soekmadi

    (Department of Forest Resource Conservation and Ecotourism, Faculty of Forestry and Environment, IPB University, Kampus IPB Darmaga, Bogor 16680, Indonesia)

  • Machfud

    (Department of Agroindustry Technology, Faculty of Agricultural Technology, IPB University, Kampus IPB Darmaga, Bogor 16680, Indonesia)

Abstract

Bamboo has been part of the history and the socio-cultural and economic or livelihood aspects of Indonesia. Bamboo has been recommended as a potential species that could be utilized for community-based development in the rural part of the country as well as for utilization in various products, from traditional to modern and contemporary processes. However, there is a lack of integrated research on the community’s bamboo for industrial-scale products. This study aimed to determine and assess drivers-barriers to enable the formulation of strategic recommendations aimed at promoting the success of community-based supply of the commodity for the modern bamboo industry in Ngada Regency in Indonesia. The methods were applied by collecting quantitative and qualitative data using literature reviews, questionnaires, interviews, focus group discussions, and direct field observations. Collected data were analyzed by descriptive analysis and assessing both for internal and external factors of drivers-barriers. Research findings showed that the community proceeds from a traditional mindset with regard bamboo resources and utilization but that the community actually already owned social capital to strengthen and drive modern bamboo utilization. However, there is still a lack of capacity building for bamboo management. This study also provides policymakers with strategic recommendations to develop integrated programs and regulations, support community-based bamboo utilization, improve livelihood, and support rural inclusive economic growth.

Suggested Citation

  • Desy Ekawati & Lina Karlinasari & Rinekso Soekmadi & Machfud, 2022. "Drivers, Barriers, and Strategies in the Community-Based Supply of Bamboo for Industrial-Scale Bamboo Utilization in Ngada Regency, East Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-22, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:10:p:5970-:d:815681
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/10/5970/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/10/5970/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Roshan Sharma & Jaya Wahono & Himlal Baral, 2018. "Bamboo as an Alternative Bioenergy Crop and Powerful Ally for Land Restoration in Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-10, November.
    2. Kant, Shashi & Chiu, Marian, 2000. "Bamboo sector reforms and the local economy of Linan County, Zhejiang Province, People's Republic of China," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 1(3-4), pages 283-299, December.
    3. Ziyan Wang & Cheng Wang & Zehui Jiang & Tao Hu & Wenjing Han & Chang Zhang & Jiali Jin & Kaiyue Wei & Jiao Zhao & Xinyu Wang, 2020. "Relationship between Rural Settlements’ Plant Communities and Environmental Factors in Hilly Area of Southeast China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-17, April.
    4. Dyson, Robert G., 2004. "Strategic development and SWOT analysis at the University of Warwick," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 152(3), pages 631-640, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Desy Ekawati & Lina Karlinasari & Rinekso Soekmadi & Machfud, 2023. "A Model of Integrated Community-Based Bamboo Management for the Bamboo Industry in Ngada Regency, East Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-18, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Claudio Baudino & Nicole Roberta Giuggioli & Rossella Briano & Stefano Massaglia & Cristiana Peano, 2017. "Integrated Methodologies (SWOT, TOWS, LCA) for Improving Production Chains and Environmental Sustainability of Kiwifruit and Baby Kiwi in Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-18, September.
    2. Sepehr Ghazinoory & Mansoureh Abdi & Mandana Azadegan-Mehr, 2010. "Swot Methodology: A State-of-the-Art Review for the Past, A Framework for the Future," Journal of Business Economics and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(1), pages 24-48, November.
    3. Alireza Radan & Milad Latifi & Minoo Moshtaghie & Mozhgan Ahmadi & Maryam Omidi, 2017. "Determining The Sensitive Conservative Site In Kolah Ghazi National Park, Iran, In Order To Management Wildlife By Using Gis Software," Environment & Ecosystem Science (EES), Zibeline International Publishing, vol. 1(2), pages 13-15, November.
    4. Edison Navarrete & Fernando Morante-Carballo & Jairo Dueñas-Tovar & Paúl Carrión-Mero & María Jaya-Montalvo & Edgar Berrezueta, 2022. "Assessment of Geosites within a Natural Protected Area: A Case Study of Cajas National Park," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-26, March.
    5. Scholz, Roland W. & Czichos, Reiner & Parycek, Peter & Lampoltshammer, Thomas J., 2020. "Organizational vulnerability of digital threats: A first validation of an assessment method," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 282(2), pages 627-643.
    6. Piotr F. Borowski, 2022. "Management of Energy Enterprises in Zero-Emission Conditions: Bamboo as an Innovative Biomass for the Production of Green Energy by Power Plants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-16, March.
    7. Ali Akbar Jamali & Ramin Tabatabaee & Timothy O. Randhir, 2021. "Ecotourism and socioeconomic strategies for Khansar River watershed of Iran," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(11), pages 17077-17093, November.
    8. Francesco Pagliacci & Leonardo Cei & Edi Defrancesco & Paola Gatto, 2022. "The EU Mountain Product Voluntary Quality Term as a Valorization Tool for Livestock Farms: Challenges and Opportunities in an Alpine Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-15, March.
    9. Thomas J. Lampoltshammer & Valerie Albrecht & Corinna Raith, 2021. "Teaching Digital Sustainability in Higher Education from a Transdisciplinary Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-21, October.
    10. Phadermrod, Boonyarat & Crowder, Richard M. & Wills, Gary B., 2019. "Importance-Performance Analysis based SWOT analysis," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 194-203.
    11. Jannis Langer & Jaco Quist & Kornelis Blok, 2021. "Review of Renewable Energy Potentials in Indonesia and Their Contribution to a 100% Renewable Electricity System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-21, October.
    12. Paúl Carrión-Mero & César Borja-Bernal & Gricelda Herrera-Franco & Fernando Morante-Carballo & María Jaya-Montalvo & Alfonso Maldonado-Zamora & Nataly Paz-Salas & Edgar Berrezueta, 2021. "Geosites and Geotourism in the Local Development of Communities of the Andes Mountains. A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-23, April.
    13. Robert G. Dyson & Frances A. O’Brien & Devan B. Shah, 2021. "Soft OR and Practice: The Contribution of the Founders of Operations Research," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 69(3), pages 727-738, May.
    14. Karolis Andriuškevičius & Dalia Štreimikienė, 2022. "Energy M&A Market in the Baltic States Analyzed through the Lens of Sustainable Development," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-21, October.
    15. Desy Ekawati & Lina Karlinasari & Rinekso Soekmadi & Machfud, 2023. "A Model of Integrated Community-Based Bamboo Management for the Bamboo Industry in Ngada Regency, East Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-18, January.
    16. Mingers, John & White, Leroy, 2010. "A review of the recent contribution of systems thinking to operational research and management science," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(3), pages 1147-1161, December.
    17. Heise, Heinke & Crisan, Alexandra & Theuvsen, Ludwig, 2015. "The Poultry Market in Nigeria: Market Structures and Potential for Investment in the Market," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 18(A), pages 1-26, July.
    18. Cinzia Daraio & Léopold Simar, 2016. "Efficiency and benchmarking with directional distances: a data-driven approach," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 67(7), pages 928-944, July.
    19. Wiek, Arnim & Walter, Alexander I., 2009. "A transdisciplinary approach for formalized integrated planning and decision-making in complex systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 197(1), pages 360-370, August.
    20. Barak, Sasan & Javanmard, Shima, 2020. "Outsourcing modelling using a novel interval-valued fuzzy quantitative strategic planning matrix (QSPM) and multiple criteria decision-making (MCDMs)," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:10:p:5970-:d:815681. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.