IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2021i1p78-d708468.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multi-Criteria Optimization of Mechanized Earth Processes and Its Impact on Economic and Environmental Sustainability

Author

Listed:
  • Jozef Gašparík

    (Department of Building Technology, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava, 810 05 Bratislava, Slovakia)

  • Vít Motyčka

    (Department of Technology, Mechanization and Construction Management, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Brno University of Technology, 602 00 Brno, Czech Republic)

  • Patrik Šťastný

    (Department of Building Technology, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava, 810 05 Bratislava, Slovakia)

  • Sylvia Szalayová

    (Department of Building Technology, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava, 810 05 Bratislava, Slovakia)

Abstract

The optimization of mechanized construction processes has a very important impact on economic and environmental sustainability. Our analyses evaluate key factors that affect the quality, environment, and economics of mechanized earth processes. This paper also presents approaches in this area in Slovakia and abroad, and existing mathematical models for the optimal design of earthmoving machinery. The main goals of our paper are the proposal of a method of machine selection for excavation including a multi-criteria optimization method with software support and application and verification of this method in a model example. A total of nine scientific methods applied in our paper are analyzed. The key results of the research work in terms of the set goals are given in the Conclusion, where the key research results are summarized. The results of the research work presented in the paper have a direct impact on economic and environmental sustainability, which can be achieved already in the phase of construction preparation. Applications of information technologies in multi-criteria optimization of the selection of construction machines for earth processes enables their use in the BIM (building information modeling) model.

Suggested Citation

  • Jozef Gašparík & Vít Motyčka & Patrik Šťastný & Sylvia Szalayová, 2021. "Multi-Criteria Optimization of Mechanized Earth Processes and Its Impact on Economic and Environmental Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-18, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2021:i:1:p:78-:d:708468
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/1/78/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/1/78/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jozef Švajlenka & Mária Kozlovská, 2018. "Perception of User Criteria in the Context of Sustainability of Modern Methods of Construction Based on Wood," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-17, January.
    2. Jozef Švajlenka & Mária Kozlovská & Terézia Pošiváková, 2018. "Analysis of Selected Building Constructions Used in Industrial Construction in Terms of Sustainability Benefits," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-16, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Paul Mansell & Simon P. Philbin & Efrosyni Konstantinou, 2020. "Delivering UN Sustainable Development Goals’ Impact on Infrastructure Projects: An Empirical Study of Senior Executives in the UK Construction Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-29, September.
    2. Ahmed Farouk Kineber & Idris Othman & Ayodeji Emmanuel Oke & Nicholas Chileshe & Mohanad Kamil Buniya, 2020. "Identifying and Assessing Sustainable Value Management Implementation Activities in Developing Countries: The Case of Egypt," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-20, November.
    3. Rakan Alyamani & Suzanna Long, 2020. "The Application of Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process in Sustainable Project Selection," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-16, October.
    4. Kun Lu & Xiaoyan Jiang & Vivian W. Y. Tam & Mengyun Li & Hongyu Wang & Bo Xia & Qing Chen, 2019. "Development of a Carbon Emissions Analysis Framework Using Building Information Modeling and Life Cycle Assessment for the Construction of Hospital Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-18, November.
    5. Xuan Zhang & Deyuan Zhou & Hesheng Tang & Xiao Han, 2019. "Experimental study of grout defect identification in precast column based on wavelet packet analysis," International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, , vol. 15(11), pages 15501477198, November.
    6. Andreia de Castro e Silva & Robson Seleme & Wiliam de Assis Silva & Izabel Cristina Zattar & Elpidio Oscar Benitez Nara & Osiris Canciglieri Júnior & Lisianne Brittes Benitez, 2022. "Evaluation and Choice Criteria of Sustainable Suppliers in the Construction Industry: A Comparative Study in Brazilian Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-16, November.
    7. Yi Gao & Gaosheng Yang & Qiuhao Xie, 2020. "Spatial-Temporal Evolution and Driving Factors of Green Building Development in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-21, April.
    8. Monika Kulisz & Justyna Kujawska, 2020. "Prediction of Municipal Waste Generation in Poland Using Neural Network Modeling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-16, December.
    9. Asaad Almssad & Amjad Almusaed & Raad Z. Homod, 2022. "Masonry in the Context of Sustainable Buildings: A Review of the Brick Role in Architecture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-18, November.
    10. Harkaitz García & Mikel Zubizarreta & Jesús Cuadrado & Juan Luis Osa, 2018. "Sustainability Improvement in the Design of Lightweight Roofs: A New Prototype of Hybrid Steel and Wood Purlins," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-17, December.
    11. Jarosław Górecki & Manuel Díaz-Madroñero, 2020. "Who Risks and Wins?—Simulated Cost Variance in Sustainable Construction Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-31, April.
    12. Pollyanna Fernandes Bianchi & Víctor Yepes & Paulo Cezar Vitorio & Moacir Kripka, 2021. "Study of Alternatives for the Design of Sustainable Low-Income Housing in Brazil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-15, April.
    13. Junsong Jia & Jing Lei & Chundi Chen & Xu Song & Yexi Zhong, 2021. "Contribution of Renewable Energy Consumption to CO 2 Emission Mitigation: A Comparative Analysis from a Global Geographic Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-23, March.
    14. Samuel O. Alamu & Ayodeji Wemida & Tiyobistiya Tsegaye & Gbekeloluwa Oguntimein, 2021. "Sustainability Assessment of Municipal Solid Waste in Baltimore USA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-12, February.
    15. Ahmed Farouk Kineber & Ayodeji Emmanuel Oke & Mohamed Elseknidy & Mohamed Magdy Hamed & Fakunle Samuel Kayode, 2023. "Barriers to the Implementation of Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) for Sustainable Building in a Developing Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-22, January.
    16. Radka Kantová & Vít Motyčka, 2023. "Evaluation of Sustainability of Czech Vocational Education and Practical Training for the Position of Construction Manager," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-17, October.
    17. Xiaojing Meng & Beibei Wei & Yingni Zhai, 2020. "Sensitivity Analysis of Envelope Design Parameters of Industrial Buildings with Natural Ventilation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-12, December.
    18. Čeněk Jarský & Miloslava Popenková & Jozef Gašparík & Patrik Šťastný, 2022. "On Use of Construction Technology Designs for Expert Opinions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-12, May.
    19. Oriol Pons-Valladares & Jelena Nikolic, 2020. "Sustainable Design, Construction, Refurbishment and Restoration of Architecture: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-18, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2021:i:1:p:78-:d:708468. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.