IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2021i1p296-d712827.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Hybrid Multi-Objective Optimizer-Based SVM Model for Enhancing Numerical Weather Prediction: A Study for the Seoul Metropolitan Area

Author

Listed:
  • Mohanad A. Deif

    (Department of Bioelectronics, Modern University for Technology and Information (MTI), Cairo 11571, Egypt)

  • Ahmed A. A. Solyman

    (Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Istanbul Gelisim University, Avcilar 34310, Turkey)

  • Mohammed H. Alsharif

    (Department of Electrical Engineering, College of Electronics and Information Engineering, Sejong University, Seoul 05006, Korea)

  • Seungwon Jung

    (School of Electrical Engineering, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Korea)

  • Eenjun Hwang

    (School of Electrical Engineering, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Korea)

Abstract

Temperature forecasting is an area of ongoing research because of its importance in all life aspects. However, because a variety of climate factors controls the temperature, it is a never-ending challenge. The numerical weather prediction (NWP) model has been frequently used to forecast air temperature. However, because of its deprived grid resolution and lack of parameterizations, it has systematic distortions. In this study, a gray wolf optimizer (GWO) and a support vector machine (SVM) are used to ensure accuracy and stability of the next day forecasting for minimum and maximum air temperatures in Seoul, South Korea, depending on local data assimilation and prediction system (LDAPS; a model of local NWP over Korea). A total of 14 LDAPS models forecast data, the daily maximum and minimum air temperatures of in situ observations, and five auxiliary data were used as input variables. The LDAPS model, the multimodal array (MME), the particle swarm optimizer with support vector machine (SVM-PSO), and the conventional SVM were selected as comparison models in this study to illustrate the advantages of the proposed model. When compared to the particle swarm optimizer and traditional SVM, the Gray Wolf Optimizer produced more accurate results, with the average RMSE value of SVM for T max and T min Forecast prediction reduced by roughly 51 percent when combined with GWO and 31 percent when combined with PSO. In addition, the hybrid model (SVM-GWO) improved the performance of the LDAPS model by lowering the RMSE values for T max Forecast and T min Forecast forecasting from 2.09 to 0.95 and 1.43 to 0.82, respectively. The results show that the proposed hybrid (GWO-SVM) models outperform benchmark models in terms of prediction accuracy and stability and that the suggested model has a lot of application potentials.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohanad A. Deif & Ahmed A. A. Solyman & Mohammed H. Alsharif & Seungwon Jung & Eenjun Hwang, 2021. "A Hybrid Multi-Objective Optimizer-Based SVM Model for Enhancing Numerical Weather Prediction: A Study for the Seoul Metropolitan Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-17, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2021:i:1:p:296-:d:712827
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/1/296/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/1/296/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. V. Durai & Rashmi Bhradwaj, 2014. "Evaluation of statistical bias correction methods for numerical weather prediction model forecasts of maximum and minimum temperatures," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 73(3), pages 1229-1254, September.
    2. Markus Reichstein & Gustau Camps-Valls & Bjorn Stevens & Martin Jung & Joachim Denzler & Nuno Carvalhais & Prabhat, 2019. "Deep learning and process understanding for data-driven Earth system science," Nature, Nature, vol. 566(7743), pages 195-204, February.
    3. Mohammed H. Alsharif & Jeong Kim & Jin Hong Kim, 2018. "Opportunities and Challenges of Solar and Wind Energy in South Korea: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-23, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Licheng Liu & Wang Zhou & Kaiyu Guan & Bin Peng & Shaoming Xu & Jinyun Tang & Qing Zhu & Jessica Till & Xiaowei Jia & Chongya Jiang & Sheng Wang & Ziqi Qin & Hui Kong & Robert Grant & Symon Mezbahuddi, 2024. "Knowledge-guided machine learning can improve carbon cycle quantification in agroecosystems," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, December.
    2. Hong, Sanghyun & Kim, Eunsung & Jeong, Saerok, 2023. "Evaluating the sustainability of the hydrogen economy using multi-criteria decision-making analysis in Korea," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 485-492.
    3. Zhang, Shuangyi & Li, Xichen, 2021. "Future projections of offshore wind energy resources in China using CMIP6 simulations and a deep learning-based downscaling method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    4. Florian Reiner & Martin Brandt & Xiaoye Tong & David Skole & Ankit Kariryaa & Philippe Ciais & Andrew Davies & Pierre Hiernaux & Jérôme Chave & Maurice Mugabowindekwe & Christian Igel & Stefan Oehmcke, 2023. "More than one quarter of Africa’s tree cover is found outside areas previously classified as forest," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-10, December.
    5. Manish Kumar Singla & Jyoti Gupta & Parag Nijhawan & Amandeep Singh Oberoi & Mohammed H. Alsharif & Abu Jahid, 2023. "Role of a Unitized Regenerative Fuel Cell in Remote Area Power Supply: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-21, August.
    6. Min Hee Chung, 2020. "Comparison of Economic Feasibility for Efficient Peer-to-Peer Electricity Trading of PV-Equipped Residential House in Korea," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-21, July.
    7. Wang, Yangjun & Liu, Kefeng & Zhang, Ren & Qian, Longxia & Shan, Yulong, 2021. "Feasibility of the Northeast Passage: The role of vessel speed, route planning, and icebreaking assistance determined by sea-ice conditions for the container shipping market during 2020–2030," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    8. Richards, Daniel Rex & Lavorel, Sandra, 2022. "Integrating social media data and machine learning to analyse scenarios of landscape appreciation," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    9. Daphne Ngar-yin Mah & Darren Man-wai Cheung, 2020. "Conceptualizing Niche–Regime Dynamics of Energy Transitions from a Political Economic Perspective: Insights from Community-Led Urban Solar in Seoul," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-28, June.
    10. Md. Sanwar Hossain & Abu Jahid & Khondoker Ziaul Islam & Mohammed H. Alsharif & Md. Fayzur Rahman, 2020. "Multi-Objective Optimum Design of Hybrid Renewable Energy System for Sustainable Energy Supply to a Green Cellular Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-35, April.
    11. Galaz, Victor & Centeno, Miguel A. & Callahan, Peter W. & Causevic, Amar & Patterson, Thayer & Brass, Irina & Baum, Seth & Farber, Darryl & Fischer, Joern & Garcia, David & McPhearson, Timon & Jimenez, 2021. "Artificial intelligence, systemic risks, and sustainability," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    12. Ralf Havertz, 2021. "South Korea’s hydrogen economy program as a case of weak ecological modernization," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 209-226, June.
    13. Guoxiong Chen & Qiuming Cheng & Timothy W. Lyons & Jun Shen & Frits Agterberg & Ning Huang & Molei Zhao, 2022. "Reconstructing Earth’s atmospheric oxygenation history using machine learning," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    14. Zhang, Xinru & Hou, Lei & Liu, Jiaquan & Yang, Kai & Chai, Chong & Li, Yanhao & He, Sichen, 2022. "Energy consumption prediction for crude oil pipelines based on integrating mechanism analysis and data mining," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PB).
    15. Zhou, Huanyu & Qiu, Yingning & Feng, Yanhui & Liu, Jing, 2022. "Power prediction of wind turbine in the wake using hybrid physical process and machine learning models," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 568-586.
    16. Rabbani, Rabab & Zeeshan, Muhammad, 2022. "Impact of policy changes on financial viability of wind power plants in Pakistan," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 789-806.
    17. Akash Koppa & Dominik Rains & Petra Hulsman & Rafael Poyatos & Diego G. Miralles, 2022. "A deep learning-based hybrid model of global terrestrial evaporation," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-11, December.
    18. Guanyin Shuai & Yan Zhou & Jingli Shao & Yali Cui & Qiulan Zhang & Chaowei Jin & Shuyuan Xu, 2024. "Comparison of Multiple Machine Learning Methods for Correcting Groundwater Levels Predicted by Physics-Based Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-18, January.
    19. Shasha Song & Isaac R. Santos & Huaming Yu & Faming Wang & William C. Burnett & Thomas S. Bianchi & Junyu Dong & Ergang Lian & Bin Zhao & Lawrence Mayer & Qingzhen Yao & Zhigang Yu & Bochao Xu, 2022. "A global assessment of the mixed layer in coastal sediments and implications for carbon storage," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-10, December.
    20. Chao, Xiangrui & Ran, Qin & Chen, Jia & Li, Tie & Qian, Qian & Ergu, Daji, 2022. "Regulatory technology (Reg-Tech) in financial stability supervision: Taxonomy, key methods, applications and future directions," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2021:i:1:p:296-:d:712827. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.