IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i9p5236-d550267.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ecological Compensation Standard of a Water-Receiving Area in an Inter-Basin Water Diversion Based on Ecosystem Service Value and Public Willingness: A Case Study of Beijing

Author

Listed:
  • Zhuoyue Peng

    (College of Hydraulic Science and Engineering, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China)

  • Hao Wu

    (College of Hydraulic Science and Engineering, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China)

  • Maohua Ding

    (College of Hydraulic Science and Engineering, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China)

  • Min Li

    (College of Hydraulic Science and Engineering, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China)

  • Xi Huang

    (College of Hydraulic Science and Engineering, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China)

  • Rui Zheng

    (College of Hydraulic Science and Engineering, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China)

  • Lin Xu

    (College of Hydraulic Science and Engineering, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China)

Abstract

Ecological compensation has recently gained significant attention as an economic incentive promoting natural resource management. However, there remain several challenges to its application. A key issue is the lack of a method clearly define the standard of ecological compensation. This study established an accounting methodology for the ecological compensation standard for the water-receiving area in an inter-basin water diversion in China. Beijing, a major water-receiving area of the South-to-North Water Diversion Project, was used as an example of the application of this approach. First, the evaluation index of ecosystem service value of the water-receiving area was selected, then, emergy theory was used to calculate the increment of ecological service value based on the characteristics of each indicator. The ecological service value due to the project was calculated to be 3.898 billion RMB, while the willingness-to-pay by the public was estimated at 915 million RMB. Therefore, the increment of ecological service value was the highest standard of compensation, and the public’s willingness-to-pay was the lower limit of ecological compensation. The final compensation standard can be determined through negotiation between suppliers and beneficiaries under the leadership of relevant governments and water-transfer authorities. Thus, this study aimed to provide a scientific basis for the construction of diversified ecological compensation mechanisms and promote sustainable development of the region.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhuoyue Peng & Hao Wu & Maohua Ding & Min Li & Xi Huang & Rui Zheng & Lin Xu, 2021. "Ecological Compensation Standard of a Water-Receiving Area in an Inter-Basin Water Diversion Based on Ecosystem Service Value and Public Willingness: A Case Study of Beijing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-15, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:9:p:5236-:d:550267
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/9/5236/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/9/5236/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kathleen McAfee, 2012. "The Contradictory Logic of Global Ecosystem Services Markets," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 43(1), pages 105-131, January.
    2. Jijun Tan & Jinhua Zhao, 2014. "The Value of Clean Air in China: Evidence from Beijing and Shanghai," Frontiers of Economics in China-Selected Publications from Chinese Universities, Higher Education Press, vol. 9(1), pages 109-137, March.
    3. Van Hecken, Gert & Bastiaensen, Johan & Vásquez, William F., 2012. "The viability of local payments for watershed services: Empirical evidence from Matiguás, Nicaragua," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 169-176.
    4. Fang, Delin & Chen, Shaoqing & Chen, Bin, 2015. "Emergy analysis for the upper Mekong river intercepted by the Manwan hydropower construction," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 899-909.
    5. John Kerr & Grant Milne & Vasudha Chhotray & Pari Baumann & A.J. James, 2007. "Managing Watershed Externalities in India: Theory and Practice," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 9(3), pages 263-281, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yali Lu & Linfang Fan & Luyu Zhai, 2023. "Evolutionary Game Analysis of Inter-provincial Diversified Ecological Compensation Collaborative Governance," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 37(1), pages 341-357, January.
    2. Yefei Liu & Gui Meng & Shuirong Wu & Xufeng Zhang & Chengle Zhao & Hongguo Yang, 2022. "Influencing Factors and Measurement of “Willingness to Accept” Living with Alligators in a Nature Reserve: A Case Study in National Chinese Alligator Nature Reserve, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-16, October.
    3. Hongwei Huang & Shan Jiang & Xuerui Gao & Yong Zhao & Lixing Lin & Jichao Wang & Xinxueqi Han, 2022. "The Temporal Evolution of Physical Water Consumption and Virtual Water Flow in Beijing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-15, August.
    4. Yuefei Su & Shuai Zhong & Li An & Lei Shen & Ding Li, 2023. "An Information System for Comprehensive Evaluation of Natural Resources and Ecosystem Services Value: Design and Case Application," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-16, March.
    5. Kamal Abdelrahim Mohamed Shuka & Wang Ke & Mohammad Sohail Nazar & Ghali Abdullahi Abubakar & AmirReza Shahtahamssebi, 2022. "Impact of Hydrological Infrastructure Projects on Land Use/Cover and Socioeconomic Development in Arid Regions—Evidence from the Upper Atbara and Setit Dam Complex, Kassala, Eastern Sudan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-23, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Van Hecken, Gert & Bastiaensen, Johan & Windey, Catherine, 2015. "Towards a power-sensitive and socially-informed analysis of payments for ecosystem services (PES): Addressing the gaps in the current debate," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 117-125.
    2. Kolinjivadi, Vijay & Charré, Simon & Adamowski, Jan & Kosoy, Nicolás, 2019. "Economic Experiments for Collective Action in the Kyrgyz Republic: Lessons for Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES)," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 489-498.
    3. Patrick Bottazzi & David Crespo & Harry Soria & Hy Dao & Marcelo Serrudo & Jean Paul Benavides & Stefan Schwarzer & Stephan Rist, 2014. "Carbon Sequestration in Community Forests: Trade-offs, Multiple Outcomes and Institutional Diversity in the Bolivian Amazon," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 45(1), pages 105-131, January.
    4. Trædal, Leif Tore & Vedeld, Pål Olav & Pétursson, Jón Geir, 2016. "Analyzing the transformations of forest PES in Vietnam: Implications for REDD+," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 109-117.
    5. Jayme Walenta, 2020. "Climate risk assessments and science‐based targets: A review of emerging private sector climate action tools," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(2), March.
    6. Angelos Alamanos & Phoebe Koundouri, 2022. "Economics of Incorporating Ecosystem Services into Water Resource Planning and Management," DEOS Working Papers 2211, Athens University of Economics and Business.
    7. Morgan, Edward A. & Buckwell, Andrew & Guidi, Caterina & Garcia, Beatriz & Rimmer, Lawrence & Cadman, Tim & Mackey, Brendan, 2022. "Capturing multiple forest ecosystem services for just benefit sharing: The Basket of Benefits Approach," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    8. Sheng, Jichuan & Qiu, Hong, 2018. "Governmentality within REDD+: Optimizing incentives and efforts to reduce emissions from deforestation and degradation," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 611-622.
    9. Ezzine-de-Blas, Driss & Corbera, Esteve & Lapeyre, Renaud, 2019. "Payments for Environmental Services and Motivation Crowding: Towards a Conceptual Framework," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 434-443.
    10. Dzeraviaha, Ihar, 2018. "Mainstream economics toolkit within the ecological economics framework," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 15-21.
    11. Du, Hailong & Yang, Liu & Wang, Wenzhong & Lu, Lunhui & Li, Zhe, 2022. "Emergy theory to quantify the sustainability of large cascade hydropower projects in the upper Yangtze," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 468(C).
    12. Singh, Neera M., 2015. "Payments for ecosystem services and the gift paradigm: Sharing the burden and joy of environmental care," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 53-61.
    13. Aguilar-Gómez, Carlos R. & Arteaga-Reyes, Tizbe T. & Gómez-Demetrio, William & à vila-Akerberg, Víctor D. & Pérez-Campuzano, Enrique, 2020. "Differentiated payments for environmental services: A review of the literature," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 44(C).
    14. Úrsula da Silva Morales & Marco Aurélio Rotta & Darci Carlos Fornari & Danilo Pedro Streit, 2022. "Aquaculture Sustainability Assessed by Emergy Synthesis: The Importance of Water Accounting," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-25, November.
    15. Arora-Jonsson, Seema & Gurung, Jeannette, 2023. "Changing business as usual in global climate and development action: Making space for social justice in carbon markets," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 29(C).
    16. Willemen, Louise & Drakou, Evangelia G. & Dunbar, Martha B. & Mayaux, Philippe & Egoh, Benis N., 2013. "Safeguarding ecosystem services and livelihoods: Understanding the impact of conservation strategies on benefit flows to society," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 4(C), pages 95-103.
    17. Michael Kaplowitz & Frank Lupi & Oscar Arreola, 2012. "Local Markets for Payments for Environmental Services: Can Small Rural Communities Self-Finance Watershed Protection?," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 26(13), pages 3689-3704, October.
    18. Kai Xiong & Fanbin Kong & Ning Zhang & Ni Lei & Chuanwang Sun, 2018. "Analysis of the Factors Influencing Willingness to Pay and Payout Level for Ecological Environment Improvement of the Ganjiang River Basin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-17, June.
    19. Fletcher, Robert & Büscher, Bram, 2017. "The PES Conceit: Revisiting the Relationship between Payments for Environmental Services and Neoliberal Conservation," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 224-231.
    20. Ren, Siyue & Feng, Xiao & Yang, Minbo, 2023. "Solution of issues in emergy theory caused by pathway tracking: Taking China's power generation system as an example," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(PB).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:9:p:5236-:d:550267. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.