IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i8p4378-d536182.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Material Flow Analysis to Evaluate Supply Chain Evolution and Management: An Example Focused on Maritime Pine in the Landes de Gascogne Forest, France

Author

Listed:
  • Rory J. Layton

    (Université de Bordeaux, CNRS, Bordeaux INP, ISM, UMR 5255, F-33400 Talence, France)

  • Rachel Horta Arduin

    (Université de Bordeaux, CNRS, Bordeaux INP, ISM, UMR 5255, F-33400 Talence, France)

  • Haji Yazdeen

    (Université de Bordeaux, CNRS, Bordeaux INP, ISM, UMR 5255, F-33400 Talence, France
    Arts et Métiers, Université de Bordeaux, CNRS, Bordeaux INP, UMR 5295, F-33405 Talence, France)

  • Regis Pommier

    (Arts et Métiers, Université de Bordeaux, CNRS, Bordeaux INP, UMR 5295, F-33405 Talence, France)

  • Guido Sonnemann

    (Université de Bordeaux, CNRS, Bordeaux INP, ISM, UMR 5255, F-33400 Talence, France)

Abstract

The Landes de Gascogne forest, located in southwestern France, spans nearly 10,000 km 2 and consists largely of maritime pine ( Pinus pinaster ). This forest in unique to Europe because it is almost entirely created and managed by man for specific industries. On the basis of a material flow analysis, we assessed the upstream supply chain of maritime pine from 2013 to 2019, using a cradle-to-gate approach. The assessment is based on data provided by Alliance Forêts Bois, an important stakeholder of the region and leader in the production of forest resources in France. For various reasons, the harvest totals decreased 10% in the last years. We identified a clear orientation to specific industries—in 2019, 45% was used as pulpwood. This is due to the overall design of the current territory, species of tree, and market values of the pulp and paper industry. The current design provides a limited supply of old growth trees, which produce high-quality logs for construction-based products, and are also more resistant to climate variability. A future shift or balance in raw material flows could be a crucial step in protecting the long-term economic viability of the region. This article aims to contribute to new attempts in providing comprehensive views of stocks and flows in the French forest-wood supply chain.

Suggested Citation

  • Rory J. Layton & Rachel Horta Arduin & Haji Yazdeen & Regis Pommier & Guido Sonnemann, 2021. "Material Flow Analysis to Evaluate Supply Chain Evolution and Management: An Example Focused on Maritime Pine in the Landes de Gascogne Forest, France," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-12, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:8:p:4378-:d:536182
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/8/4378/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/8/4378/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jonathan Lenglet & Jean-Yves Courtonne & Sylvain Caurla, 2016. "Material flow analysis of the forest-wood supply chain: a consequential approach for log export policies in France," Working Papers - Cahiers du LEF 2016-04, Laboratoire d'Economie Forestiere, AgroParisTech-INRA, revised Apr 2016.
    2. Bais, Anna Liza S. & Lauk, Christian & Kastner, Thomas & Erb, Karlheinz, 2015. "Global patterns and trends of wood harvest and use between 1990 and 2010," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 326-337.
    3. João Patrício & Yuliya Kalmykova & Leonardo Rosado & Vera Lisovskaja, 2015. "Uncertainty in Material Flow Analysis Indicators at Different Spatial Levels," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 19(5), pages 837-852, October.
    4. Chihiro Kayo & Sébastien M.R. Dente & Chika Aoki‐Suzuki & Daisuke Tanaka & Shinsuke Murakami & Seiji Hashimoto, 2019. "Environmental Impact Assessment of Wood Use in Japan through 2050 Using Material Flow Analysis and Life Cycle Assessment," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 23(3), pages 635-648, June.
    5. Thomas Beaussier & Sylvain Caurla & Véronique Bellon Maurel & Eléonore Loiseau, 2019. "Coupling economic models and environmental assessment methods to support regional policies : A critical review," Post-Print hal-02021423, HAL.
    6. Valentin Bellassen & Sebastiaan Luyssaert, 2014. "Carbon sequestration: Managing forests in uncertain times," Nature, Nature, vol. 506(7487), pages 153-155, February.
    7. Oliver Schwab & Ottavia Zoboli & Helmut Rechberger, 2017. "A Data Characterization Framework for Material Flow Analysis," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 21(1), pages 16-25, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jörg Schweinle & Natalia Geng & Susanne Iost & Holger Weimar & Dominik Jochem, 2020. "Monitoring Sustainability Effects of the Bioeconomy: A Material Flow Based Approach Using the Example of Softwood Lumber and Its Core Product Epal 1 Pallet," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-27, March.
    2. Tianran Ding & Wouter Achten, 2023. "Coupling agent-based modeling with territorial LCA to support agricultural land-use planning," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/359527, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    3. Nicolas Robert & Ragnar Jonsson & Rafał Chudy & Andrea Camia, 2020. "The EU Bioeconomy: Supporting an Employment Shift Downstream in the Wood-Based Value Chains?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-14, January.
    4. Diyamandoglu, Vasil & Fortuna, Lorena M., 2015. "Deconstruction of wood-framed houses: Material recovery and environmental impact," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 21-30.
    5. Nguyet Thi Tran & Dirk Weichgrebe, 2020. "Regional material flow behaviors of agro‐food processing craft villages in Red River Delta, Vietnam," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 24(3), pages 707-725, June.
    6. Broitman, Dani & Ben-Haim, Yakov, 2022. "Forecasting residential sprawl under uncertainty: An info-gap analysis," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    7. Piciu Gabriela-Cornelia, 2021. "Ways To Accelerate The Circular Economy," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 5, pages 129-134, October.
    8. Miatto, Alessio & Schandl, Heinz & Tanikawa, Hiroki, 2017. "How important are realistic building lifespan assumptions for material stock and demolition waste accounts?," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 143-154.
    9. Baranzini, Andrea & Borzykowski, Nicolas & Carattini, Stefano, 2018. "Carbon offsets out of the woods? Acceptability of domestic vs. international reforestation programmes in the lab," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 1-12.
    10. Lund, Peter D., 2017. "Implications of Finland's plan to ban coal and cutting oil use," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 78-80.
    11. Petros Ganatsas & Marianthi Tsakaldimi & Theodoros Karydopoulos & Lydia-Maria Petaloudi & Alexandros Papaemmanouil & Sotirios Papadopoulos & Sofia Gerochristou, 2022. "Carbon Pools in a 77 Year-Old Oak Forest under Conversion from Coppice to High Forest," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-19, October.
    12. Zackery B. Morris & Marc Weissburg & Bert Bras, 2021. "Ecological network analysis of urban–industrial ecosystems," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 25(1), pages 193-204, February.
    13. Choe, Changgwon & Cheon, Seunghyun & Gu, Jiwon & Lim, Hankwon, 2022. "Critical aspect of renewable syngas production for power-to-fuel via solid oxide electrolysis: Integrative assessment for potential renewable energy source," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    14. Andrea Baranzini & Nicolas Borzykowski & Stefano Carattini, 2016. "Carbon offsets out of the woods? The acceptability of domestic vs. international reforestation programmes," GRI Working Papers 257, Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment.
    15. Kalmykova, Yuliya & Berg, Per E.-O. & Patrício, João & Lisovskaja, Vera, 2017. "Portable battery lifespans and new estimation method for battery collection rate based on a lifespan modeling approach," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 65-74.
    16. Hong Yao & Qingxiang Zhang & Guangyuan Niu & Huan Liu & Yuxi Yang, 2021. "Applying the GM(1,1) model to simulate and predict the ecological footprint values of Suzhou city, China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(8), pages 11297-11309, August.
    17. Christopher Coutts & Micah Hahn, 2015. "Green Infrastructure, Ecosystem Services, and Human Health," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-31, August.
    18. Jean‐Yves Courtonne & Pierre‐Yves Longaretti & Denis Dupré, 2018. "Uncertainties of Domestic Road Freight Statistics: Insights for Regional Material Flow Studies," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 22(5), pages 1189-1201, October.
    19. Santos, Andreia & Carvalho, Ana & Barbosa-Póvoa, Ana Paula & Marques, Alexandra & Amorim, Pedro, 2019. "Assessment and optimization of sustainable forest wood supply chains – A systematic literature review," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 112-135.
    20. Vilaysouk, Xaysackda & Schandl, Heinz & Murakami, Shinsuke, 2017. "Improving the knowledge base on material flow analysis for Asian developing countries: A case study of Lao PDR," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 179-189.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:8:p:4378-:d:536182. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.