IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i24p13661-d699406.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Definitions Matter: Dynamic Policy Framing of the Arts in Boston’s Sustainable Cultural Development

Author

Listed:
  • Xuefei Li

    (School of Government, University of International Business and Economics, Beijing 100029, China)

  • Margaret Wyszomirski

    (Department of Arts Administration, Education and Policy, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA)

  • Biyun Zhu

    (School of Arts, Languages and Cultures, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK)

Abstract

Cultural sustainability has become a fourth pillar in sustainable development studies. Different from the research approach to embedding culture into conventional sustainable discourse, this article argues that the sustainability and resilience issues within the arts and cultural sector should be paid more attention to. Putting the arts and cultural sector in urban settings, sustainable cultural development entails dynamic policy framing and changing policy justifications in response to an evolving socioeconomic and political environment. Taking the policy framing of the arts as an analytical lens, this paper aims to investigate this dynamic change and key driving factors through an in-depth case study of Boston’s urban cultural development. This article finds that different definitions of the arts are associated with different arts-based urban development strategies across four stages of cultural development in Boston spanning a period of over 75 years. The working definition moved from art to the arts, then to the creative arts industry, and eventually to cultural assets and creative capital. The policy framing of the arts keeps evolving and layering in pursuit of more legitimacy and resources regarding groups of stakeholders, field industry components, types of industrial structure, and multiple policy goals. This dynamic policy framing has been driven by arts advocacy groups, policy learning process, urban leadership change, and cultural institutional change, allowing Boston to draw on a growing and diversifying set of cultural resources in pursuit of sustainable cultural development.

Suggested Citation

  • Xuefei Li & Margaret Wyszomirski & Biyun Zhu, 2021. "Definitions Matter: Dynamic Policy Framing of the Arts in Boston’s Sustainable Cultural Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-17, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:24:p:13661-:d:699406
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/24/13661/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/24/13661/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Scott, Allen J., 2010. "Cultural economy and the creative field of the city," MPRA Paper 32108, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Serhat Kaymas, 2020. "Geography … is it your destiny? Culturally sustainable development and creative industries nexus in the case of Turkey," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(10), pages 2040-2059, October.
    3. Throsby,David, 2010. "The Economics of Cultural Policy," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521868259.
    4. Pralle, Sarah B., 2003. "Venue Shopping, Political Strategy, and Policy Change: The Internationalization of Canadian Forest Advocacy," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 23(3), pages 233-260, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Suwala, Lech, 2017. "On Creativity: From conceptual ideas towards a systemic understanding," EconStor Conference Papers 221767, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    2. Andréa Jean Baker, 2017. "Algorithms to Assess Music Cities," SAGE Open, , vol. 7(1), pages 21582440176, March.
    3. Christopher Pallas & Johannes Urpelainen, 2012. "NGO monitoring and the legitimacy of international cooperation: A strategic analysis," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 1-32, March.
    4. Castiglione, Concetta & Infante, Davide & Zieba, Marta, 2023. "Public support for performing arts. Efficiency and productivity gains in eleven European countries," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    5. Ghazala Idrees & Abid Ghafoor Chaudhry, 2020. "Precursors of Pollen Allergies: An Anthropo-Economic Perspective," Global Economics Review, Humanity Only, vol. 5(2), pages 17-28, June.
    6. Giuseppe Attanasi & Ylenia Curci & Patrick Llerena & Adriana Carolina Pinate & Maria del Pino Ramos-Sosa & Giulia Urso, 2019. "Looking at Creativity from East to West: Risk Taking and Intrinsic Motivation in Socially and Culturally Diverse Countries," GREDEG Working Papers 2019-21, Groupe de REcherche en Droit, Economie, Gestion (GREDEG CNRS), Université Côte d'Azur, France.
    7. Lei Xiong & Cheng-Lein Teng & Bo-Wei Zhu & Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng & Shan-Lin Huang, 2017. "Using the D-DANP-mV Model to Explore the Continuous System Improvement Strategy for Sustainable Development of Creative Communities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-37, October.
    8. Ugo Rossi & Arturo Di Bella, 2017. "Start-up urbanism: New York, Rio de Janeiro and the global urbanization of technology-based economies," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 49(5), pages 999-1018, May.
    9. Emmanuelle Perin & Evelyne Léonard, 2011. "European sectoral social dialogue and national social partners," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 17(2), pages 159-168, May.
    10. Cécile Doustaly & Vishalakshi Roy, 2022. "A Comparative Analysis of the Economic Sustainability of Cultural Work in the UK since the COVID-19 Pandemic and Examination of Universal Basic Income as a Solution for Cultural Workers," Post-Print hal-03767292, HAL.
    11. Niusha Esmaeilpoorarabi & Tan Yigitcanlar & Mirko Guaralda, 2016. "Place quality and urban competitiveness symbiosis? A position paper," International Journal of Knowledge-Based Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 7(1), pages 4-21.
    12. Rushton, Michael, 2019. "Expensive Tastes and Public Funding for the Arts," MPRA Paper 113404, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Stefania Fiorentino, 2019. "The Maker Faire of Rome as a window of observation on the new perspectives for local economic development and the new urban entrepreneurial ecosystems," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 34(4), pages 364-381, June.
    14. Juan-Luis Klein & Diane-Gabrielle Tremblay & Laurent Sauvage & Leila Ghaffari & Wilfredo Angulo, 2019. "Cultural Initiatives and Local Development: A Basis for Inclusive Neighborhood Revitalization," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(1), pages 78-90.
    15. Weber, Cameron & Zhen, Ying & Arias, JJ, 2022. "Practice, Entrepreneurship and Subjectivity in Artist Identification with Applications to the Covid-Era," MPRA Paper 115712, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Bruno S. Frey & Paolo Pamini, 2009. "World Heritage: Where Are We? An Empirical Analysis," CREMA Working Paper Series 2009-31, Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA).
    17. Jung-Ying Chang, 2019. "State participation and artistic autonomy in creative city making," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 51(1), pages 226-243, February.
    18. Cheng-Yi Lin, 2014. "The Evolution of Taipei’s Music Industry: Cluster and Network Dynamics in the Innovation Practices of the Music Industry," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(2), pages 335-354, February.
    19. Lucio Carlos Freire-Gibb & Anne Lorentzen, 2011. "A platform for local entrepreneurship: The case of the lighting festival of Frederikshavn," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 26(3), pages 157-169, May.
    20. Giuseppe Attanasi & Ylenia Curci & Patrick Llerena & Giulia Urso, 2019. "Intrinsic vs. Extrinsic Motivators on Creative Collaboration: The Effect of Sharing Rewards," GREDEG Working Papers 2019-20, Groupe de REcherche en Droit, Economie, Gestion (GREDEG CNRS), Université Côte d'Azur, France.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:24:p:13661-:d:699406. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.