IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i23p13373-d693833.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Developing a Comprehensive Assessment Model of Social Value with Respect to Heritage Value for Sustainable Heritage Management

Author

Listed:
  • Yabing Xu

    (School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Shandong Jianzhu University (Shandong University of Architecture and Engineering), Jinan 250101, China)

  • John Rollo

    (School of Architecture and Built Environment, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC 3220, Australia)

  • Yolanda Esteban

    (School of Architecture and Built Environment, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC 3220, Australia)

  • Hui Tong

    (School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Shandong Jianzhu University (Shandong University of Architecture and Engineering), Jinan 250101, China)

  • Xin Yin

    (School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Shandong Jianzhu University (Shandong University of Architecture and Engineering), Jinan 250101, China)

Abstract

By the end of the 20th century, the influence of economic globalization had impacted many aspects of society, including in particular cultural heritage. Additionally, economic globalization has brought a ‘compression’ of the cultures of different ethnic groups and regions around the world. Due to the loss of cultural confidence and economic benefits, many historical areas with cultural and social significance are no longer protected and valued. If this deficit is to be addressed, then the evaluation of heritage value is an important step in establishing effective conservation policies. China’s Grand Canal is a case in point. The loss of historical culture in the past 30 years, often due to the increasing numbers of both large and small developments, has given rise to the forfeit and distortion of many historically significant areas of China’s Grand Canal towns and cities. This research proposes a qualitative and quantitative methodology to develop a comprehensive assessment model of social value with respect to heritage value. The methodology selected conceptual framework, and questionnaire surveys as major approaches to the development of the research and is applied to the Grand Canal towns of Nanyang, Wuzhen, Tongli and Nanxun. The conceptual framework is used to establish the indicators and hypotheses for the evaluation of social value in order to develop a comprehensive assessment model for sustainable heritage management.

Suggested Citation

  • Yabing Xu & John Rollo & Yolanda Esteban & Hui Tong & Xin Yin, 2021. "Developing a Comprehensive Assessment Model of Social Value with Respect to Heritage Value for Sustainable Heritage Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-22, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:23:p:13373-:d:693833
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/23/13373/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/23/13373/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Obafemi A. P. Olukoya, 2021. "Framing the Values of Vernacular Architecture for a Value-Based Conservation: A Conceptual Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-18, April.
    2. Allen J Scott & Mark Ellis, 2000. "The Culture Economy of Paris∗," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(3), pages 567-582, September.
    3. Belén Onecha & Alicia Dotor & Carlos Marmolejo-Duarte, 2021. "Beyond Cultural and Historic Values, Sustainability as a New Kind of Value for Historic Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-18, July.
    4. Tianning Lan & Zhiyue Zheng & Di Tian & Rui Zhang & Rob Law & Mu Zhang, 2021. "Resident-Tourist Value Co-Creation in the Intangible Cultural Heritage Tourism Context: The Role of Residents’ Perception of Tourism Development and Emotional Solidarity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-20, January.
    5. Valerio Gatta & Edoardo Marcucci, 2014. "Urban Freight Transport Policy Changes: Improving Decision Makers’ Awareness Via An Agent-Specific Approach," Working Papers 0114, CREI Università degli Studi Roma Tre, revised 2014.
    6. Chen Kim Lim & Minhaz Farid Ahmed & Mazlin Bin Mokhtar & Kian Lam Tan & Muhammad Zaffwan Idris & Yi Chee Chan, 2021. "Understanding Intangible Culture Heritage Preservation via Analyzing Inhabitants’ Garments of Early 19th Century in Weld Quay, Malaysia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-26, May.
    7. Throsby,David, 2000. "Economics and Culture," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521586399.
    8. Gatta, Valerio & Marcucci, Edoardo, 2014. "Urban freight transport and policy changes: Improving decision makers' awareness via an agent-specific approach," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 248-252.
    9. Ana Pastor Pérez & David Barreiro Martínez & Eva Parga-Dans & Pablo Alonso González, 2021. "Democratising Heritage Values: A Methodological Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-26, November.
    10. Banerjee, Onil & Velasco, Mercedes & Maisonnave, Hélène & Beyene, Lulit Mitik & Henseler, Martin, 2017. "The Economic Benefits of Investing in Cultural Tourism: Evidence from the Colonial City of Santo Domingo," IDB Publications (Working Papers) 9055, Inter-American Development Bank.
    11. Toshiki Saito & Kosuke Motoki & Rui Nouchi & Ryuta Kawashima & Motoaki Sugiura, 2019. "Does incidental pride increase competency evaluation of others who appear careless? Discrete positive emotions and impression formation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(8), pages 1-15, August.
    12. Lindholm, Maria Eleonor & Blinge, Magnus, 2014. "Assessing knowledge and awareness of the sustainable urban freight transport among Swedish local authority policy planners," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 124-131.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Karst Geurs & Cathy Macharis, 2019. "The future of European communication and transportation research: a research agenda," REGION, European Regional Science Association, vol. 6, pages 1-21.
    2. Amaya, Johanna & Arellana, Julian & Delgado-Lindeman, Maira, 2020. "Stakeholders perceptions to sustainable urban freight policies in emerging markets," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 329-348.
    3. Daniel Kaszubowski, 2019. "A Method for the Evaluation of Urban Freight Transport Models as a Tool for Improving the Delivery of Sustainable Urban Transport Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-23, March.
    4. Marcucci, Edoardo & Gatta, Valerio & Scaccia, Luisa, 2015. "Urban freight, parking and pricing policies: An evaluation from a transport providers’ perspective," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 239-249.
    5. Marcucci, Edoardo & Gatta, Valerio & Le Pira, Michela, 2018. "Gamification design to foster stakeholder engagement and behavior change: An application to urban freight transport," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 119-132.
    6. Evangelinos, Christos & Tscharaktschiew, Stefan & Marcucci, Edoardo & Gatta, Valerio, 2018. "Pricing workplace parking via cash-out: Effects on modal choice and implications for transport policy," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 369-380.
    7. Lagorio, Alexandra & Pinto, Roberto, 2021. "Food and grocery retail logistics issues: A systematic literature review," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    8. Marcucci, Edoardo & Le Pira, Michela & Gatta, Valerio & Inturri, Giuseppe & Ignaccolo, Matteo & Pluchino, Alessandro, 2017. "Simulating participatory urban freight transport policy-making: Accounting for heterogeneous stakeholders’ preferences and interaction effects," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 69-86.
    9. Shams, Kollol & Asgari, Hamidreza & Jin, Xia, 2017. "Valuation of travel time reliability in freight transportation: A review and meta-analysis of stated preference studies," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 228-243.
    10. Ivan Cardenas & Yari Borbon-Galvez & Thomas Verlinden & Eddy Van de Voorde & Thierry Vanelslander & Wouter Dewulf, 2017. "City logistics, urban goods distribution and last mile delivery and collection," Competition and Regulation in Network Industries, , vol. 18(1-2), pages 22-43, March.
    11. Christian Barrère, 2007. "Luxury Industries: Heritage Industries? [Les industries du luxe : des industries de patrimoines ?]," Post-Print hal-02615418, HAL.
    12. Marcucci, Edoardo & Gatta, Valerio, 2017. "Investigating the potential for off-hour deliveries in the city of Rome: Retailers’ perceptions and stated reactions," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 142-156.
    13. Katsela, Konstantina & Pålsson, Henrik, 2021. "Viable business models for city logistics: Exploring the cost structure and the economy of scale in a Swedish initiative," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    14. Francesco Russo & Antonio Comi, 2016. "Urban Freight Transport Planning towards Green Goals: Synthetic Environmental Evidence from Tested Results," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-18, April.
    15. Aljohani, Khalid & Thompson, Russell G., 2020. "Receivers-led delivery consolidation policy: Estimating the characteristics of the most interested businesses to participate," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    16. Nisar Ali Khan & Camillo Nuti & Giorgio Monti & Mario Micheli, 2022. "Critical Review of Pakistani Current Legislation on Sustainable Protection of Cultural Heritage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-15, March.
    17. Gatta, Valerio & Marcucci, Edoardo & Scaccia, Luisa, 2015. "On finite sample performance of confidence intervals methods for willingness to pay measures," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 169-192.
    18. Francesco Ciardiello & Andrea Genovese & Shucheng Luo & Antonino Sgalambro, 2023. "A game-theoretic multi-stakeholder model for cost allocation in urban consolidation centres," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 324(1), pages 663-686, May.
    19. Aftabi, Pegah & Bahramjerdi, Somayeh Fadaei Nezhad, 2023. "Developing a decision-making framework within the management of historical cities: Towards integrated conservation and development of the Roudaki neighbourhood," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    20. Mathieu Gardrat & Pascal Pluvinet, 2021. "Markov based mesoscopic simulation tool for urban freight: SIMTURB," Working Papers halshs-03284321, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:23:p:13373-:d:693833. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.