IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i19p10490-d640216.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Integrated Methodology for the Multi-Objective Optimization of Port Railway Capacity: The Case Study of the Port of Trieste

Author

Listed:
  • Caterina Caramuta

    (Department of Engineering and Architecture, University of Trieste, 34127 Trieste, Italy)

  • Giovanni Longo

    (Department of Engineering and Architecture, University of Trieste, 34127 Trieste, Italy)

  • Teresa Montrone

    (Esteco S.p.A, 34149 Trieste, Italy)

  • Carlo Poloni

    (Department of Engineering and Architecture, University of Trieste, 34127 Trieste, Italy)

Abstract

The relevant pressure exerted on ports following the advent of globalization and containerization has contributed to transform the role of such intermodal transport facilities, increasing their complexity with reference to both performed activities and involved actors. The potential of solid hinterland connections in enhancing port competitiveness has sustained the larger embracement of the railway mode, which has proved to be a financially and environmentally sustainable solution, especially on long hauls. However, the limited residual capacity currently characterizing several railway network and nodes may threaten the accommodation of additional future traffic volumes and, thus, it requires the adoption of a coordinated strategy to more efficiently manage existing railway infrastructures, other than the realization of some new ones. In this regard, an integrated methodology has been developed to specifically model, simulate and optimize port railway processes, as part of a more complex system, imposing the maximization of capacity with the concurrent minimization of used shunting locomotives, to varying of infrastructural and operational conditions. This combination of techniques has been applied to the case study of the Port of Trieste, Italy, showing the greater influence of tracks availability over changes in the operational conditions, in terms of a shorter duration of specific administrative tasks and the employment of more shunting locomotives.

Suggested Citation

  • Caterina Caramuta & Giovanni Longo & Teresa Montrone & Carlo Poloni, 2021. "An Integrated Methodology for the Multi-Objective Optimization of Port Railway Capacity: The Case Study of the Port of Trieste," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-14, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:19:p:10490-:d:640216
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/19/10490/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/19/10490/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mario G. C. A. Cimino & Filippo Palumbo & Gigliola Vaglini & Erina Ferro & Nedo Celandroni & Davide Rosa, 2017. "Evaluating the impact of smart technologies on harbor’s logistics via BPMN modeling and simulation," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 223-239, September.
    2. Wil M. P. Aalst, 2015. "Business Process Simulation Survival Guide," International Handbooks on Information Systems, in: Jan vom Brocke & Michael Rosemann (ed.), Handbook on Business Process Management 1, edition 2, pages 337-370, Springer.
    3. Elbert, R. & Pontow, H., 2013. "Standardization and integration of information flow along the maritime transport chain," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 62846, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    4. Amir Samimi & Kazuya Kawamura & Abolfazl Mohammadian, 2011. "A behavioral analysis of freight mode choice decisions," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(8), pages 857-869, June.
    5. Martijn R. van der Horst & Larissa M. van der Lugt, 2011. "Coordination mechanisms in improving hinterland accessibility: empirical analysis in the port of Rotterdam," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(4), pages 415-435, March.
    6. Bruzzone, Francesco & Cavallaro, Federico & Nocera, Silvio, 2021. "The integration of passenger and freight transport for first-last mile operations," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 31-48.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ralf Elbert & Holger Pontow & Alexander Benlian, 2017. "The role of inter-organizational information systems in maritime transport chains," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 27(2), pages 157-173, May.
    2. He, Dongdong & Guan, Wei, 2023. "Promoting service quality with incentive contracts in rural bus integrated passenger-freight service," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    3. Jihane El Ouadi & Hanae Errousso & Nicolas Malhene & Siham Benhadou & Hicham Medromi, 2022. "A machine-learning based hybrid algorithm for strategic location of urban bundling hubs to support shared public transport," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(5), pages 3215-3258, October.
    4. Yang, Jinglei & Luo, Meifeng & Ji, Abing, 2016. "Analyzing the spatial–temporal evolution of a gateway’s hinterland: A case study of Shanghai, China," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 355-367.
    5. Marc Audi & Amjad Ali, 2023. "The Role of Environmental Conditions and Purchasing Power Parity in Determining Quality of Life among Big Asian Cities," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 13(3), pages 292-305, May.
    6. Namgung, Hyewon & Fujiwara, Akimasa & Yamamoto, Jenny & Zhang, Junyi, 2023. "Small and medium-sized taxi firm operators' stated choices of future business models: A case study in Japan based on hybrid choice model with panel effects," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    7. Jairo Ortega & Sarbast Moslem & János Tóth & Tamás Péter & Juan Palaguachi & Mario Paguay, 2020. "Using Best Worst Method for Sustainable Park and Ride Facility Location," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-18, December.
    8. Tessmann, R. & Elbert, R., 2022. "Multi sided platforms in competitive B2B networks with varying governmental influence – a taxonomy of Port and Cargo Community System business models," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 132320, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    9. Kumar, Akshay & Gupta, Akshay & Parida, Manoranjan & Chauhan, Vivek, 2022. "Service quality assessment of ride-sourcing services: A distinction between ride-hailing and ride-sharing services," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 61-79.
    10. Azcuy, Irecis & Agatz, Niels & Giesen, Ricardo, 2021. "Designing integrated urban delivery systems using public transport," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    11. Feo-Valero, María & Arencibia, Ana Isabel & Román, Concepción, 2016. "Analyzing discrepancies between willingness to pay and willingness to accept for freight transport attributes," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 151-164.
    12. Leise Kelli de Oliveira & Isabela Kopperschmidt de Oliveira & João Guilherme da Costa Braga França & Gustavo Wagner Nunes Balieiro & Jean Francisco Cardoso & Tiago Bogo & Diego Bogo & Marco Adriano Li, 2022. "Integrating Freight and Public Transport Terminals Infrastructure by Locating Lockers: Analysing a Feasible Solution for a Medium-Sized Brazilian Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-16, August.
    13. He, Dongdong & Ceder, Avishai (Avi) & Zhang, Wenyi & Guan, Wei & Qi, Geqi, 2023. "Optimization of a rural bus service integrated with e-commerce deliveries guided by a new sustainable policy in China," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    14. Wang, Xueqin & Wong, Yiik Diew & Shi, Wenming & Yuen, Kum Fai, 2022. "Shoppers’ logistics activities in omni-channel retailing: A conceptualisation and an exploration on perceptual differences in effort valuation," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 195-208.
    15. Hu, Wanjie & Dong, Jianjun & Hwang, Bon-Gang & Ren, Rui & Chen, Zhilong, 2022. "Is mass rapid transit applicable for deep integration of freight-passenger transport? A multi-perspective analysis from urban China," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 490-510.
    16. Thi Yen Pham & Ki Young Kim & Gi-Tae YEO, 2018. "The Panama Canal Expansion and Its Impact on East–West Liner Shipping Route Selection," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-16, November.
    17. Bruzzone, Francesco & Nocera, Silvio & Pesenti, Raffaele, 2023. "Feasibility and optimization of freight-on-transit schemes for the sustainable operation of passengers and logistics," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    18. Tomáš Settey & Jozef Gnap & Dominika Beňová & Michal Pavličko & Oľga Blažeková, 2021. "The Growth of E-Commerce Due to COVID-19 and the Need for Urban Logistics Centers Using Electric Vehicles: Bratislava Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-20, May.
    19. Kumar, Aalok & Anbanandam, Ramesh, 2020. "Evaluating the interrelationships among inhibitors to intermodal railroad freight transport in emerging economies: A multi-stakeholder perspective," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 559-581.
    20. Delle Donne, Diego & Alfandari, Laurent & Archetti, Claudia & Ljubić, Ivana, 2023. "Freight-on-Transit for urban last-mile deliveries: A strategic planning approach," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 53-81.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:19:p:10490-:d:640216. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.