IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i16p8874-d610735.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Geotourism Destinations Online Branding Co-Creation

Author

Listed:
  • Flávio Tiago

    (Centro de Investigação e Tecnologia Agrária dos Açores (CITA-A), University of the Azores, 9500 Ponta Delgada, Portugal)

  • Pedro Correia

    (Centro de Investigação e Tecnologia Agrária dos Açores (CITA-A), University of the Azores, 9500 Ponta Delgada, Portugal)

  • Victor-Alexandru Briciu

    (Departamentul de Științe sociale și ale comunicării, Facultatea de Sociologie și comunicare, Transilvania University of Brașov, 500036 Brașov, Romania)

  • Teresa Borges-Tiago

    (Centro de Investigação e Tecnologia Agrária dos Açores (CITA-A), University of the Azores, 9500 Ponta Delgada, Portugal)

Abstract

The application of brand theory to destinations has grown in the last few decades, with the destination brand personality being a viable metaphor for creating and positioning destination brands. An often-overlooked tourism typology is geotourism; more specifically, volcanic tourism, since it can be a passive element of any tourism form or active nature tourism. However, its potential is relatively unexplored in terms of online branding. For this reason, the present study analyzes online brand image co-creation, using 300 websites related to three unique volcanic tourism destinations—Iceland, the Azores, and the Canary Islands. Three different types of sources (destination marketing organizations, commercial, and editorial websites) created these contents. The results demonstrate significant differences between the communication of the three destinations, with Iceland, where there is less aligned communication, most valuing geo elements in their communication, and the Azores, where all stakeholders communicate similar brand personality traits, displaying more aligned communication regarding brand personality. In the Canary Islands geotourism is less explored as a destination offer and is consequently less communicated. Acknowledging the different brand positioning and the parity and differentiation points among destinations with the same baseline offer—volcanic tourism—can be helpful for destination brand managers to reignite tourism and promote a unique tourism experience.

Suggested Citation

  • Flávio Tiago & Pedro Correia & Victor-Alexandru Briciu & Teresa Borges-Tiago, 2021. "Geotourism Destinations Online Branding Co-Creation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-18, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:16:p:8874-:d:610735
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/16/8874/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/16/8874/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anish Yousaf & Insha Amin & Anil Gupta, 2017. "Conceptualising tourist based brand-equity pyramid: an application of Keller brand pyramid model to destinations," Tourism and Hospitality Management, University of Rijeka, Faculty of Tourism and Hospitality Management, vol. 23(1), pages 119-137, May.
    2. Astrid Dickinger & Lidija Lalicic, 2016. "An analysis of destination brand personality and emotions: a comparison study," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 317-340, January.
    3. Hosany, Sameer & Ekinci, Yuksel & Uysal, Muzaffer, 2006. "Destination image and destination personality: An application of branding theories to tourism places," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 59(5), pages 638-642, May.
    4. Teresa Borges-Tiago, Maria & Arruda, Carolina & Tiago, Flavio & Rita, Paulo, 2021. "Differences between TripAdvisor and Booking.com in branding co-creation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 380-388.
    5. M S Sodhi & B-G Son, 2010. "Content analysis of OR job advertisements to infer required skills," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 61(9), pages 1315-1327, September.
    6. Költringer, Clemens & Dickinger, Astrid, 2015. "Analyzing destination branding and image from online sources: A web content mining approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(9), pages 1836-1843.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yan Yang & Chunfa Sha & Wencheng Su & Edwin Kofi Nyefrer Donkor, 2022. "Research on Online Destination Image of Zhenjiang Section of the Grand Canal Based on Network Content Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-20, February.
    2. Anna V. Mikhailenko & Svetlana O. Zorina & Natalia N. Yashalova & Dmitry A. Ruban, 2023. "Promoting Geosites on Web-Pages: An Assessment of the Quality and Quantity of Information in Real Cases," Resources, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-17, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lidija Lalicic & Assumpció Huertas & Antonio Moreno & Mohammed Jabreel, 2019. "Which emotional brand values do my followers want to hear about? An investigation of popular European tourist destinations," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 63-81, March.
    2. Mohammed Jabreel & Assumpció Huertas & Antonio Moreno, 2018. "Semantic analysis and the evolution towards participative branding: Do locals communicate the same destination brand values as DMOs?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(11), pages 1-29, November.
    3. Steven Chen & Eric Shih, 2019. "City branding through cinema: the case of postcolonial Hong Kong," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 26(5), pages 505-521, September.
    4. Yan Yang & Chunfa Sha & Wencheng Su & Edwin Kofi Nyefrer Donkor, 2022. "Research on Online Destination Image of Zhenjiang Section of the Grand Canal Based on Network Content Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-20, February.
    5. Assumpcio Huertas & Estela Marine-Roig, 2016. "User reactions to destination brand contents in social media," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 291-315, January.
    6. Molinillo, Sebastian & Liébana-Cabanillas, Francisco & Anaya-Sánchez, Rafael & Buhalis, Dimitrios, 2018. "DMO online platforms: Image and intention to visit," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 116-130.
    7. Xialei Duan & Lawal Mohammed Marafa & Chung-Shing Chan & Han Xu & Lewis T. O. Cheung, 2020. "Measuring the Gaps in the Projected Image and Perceived Image of Rural Tourism Destinations in China’s Yangtze River Delta," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-16, June.
    8. Chatzigeorgiou, Chryssoula & Christou, Evangelos, 2016. "Destination branding and visitor brand loyalty: Evidence from mature tourism destinations in Greece," MPRA Paper 93897, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Chatzigeorgiou, Chryssoula & Christou, Evangelos, 2016. "Destination branding and visitor loyalty: Evidence from mature tourism destinations in Greece," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 11(5), pages 102-120.
    10. Cecilia Pasquinelli & Mariapina Trunfio & Nicola Bellini & Simona Rossi, 2021. "Sustainability in Overtouristified Cities? A Social Media Insight into Italian Branding Responses to Covid-19 Crisis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-14, February.
    11. Astrid Dickinger & Lidija Lalicic, 2016. "An analysis of destination brand personality and emotions: a comparison study," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 317-340, January.
    12. Wang, Jingqiang & Li, Mimi & Li, Cong & Li, Dan & Lin, Guyang, 2022. "Revisit the formation of destination brand personality," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    13. Hugo Martins & Paulo Carvalho & Nuno Almeida, 2021. "Destination Brand Experience: A Study Case in Touristic Context of the Peneda-Gerês National Park," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-17, October.
    14. Tao Liu & Ying Zhang & Huan Zhang & Xiping Yang, 2021. "A Methodological Workflow for Deriving the Association of Tourist Destinations Based on Online Travel Reviews: A Case Study of Yunnan Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-15, April.
    15. Julia Neidhardt & Nataliia Rümmele & Hannes Werthner, 0. "Predicting happiness: user interactions and sentiment analysis in an online travel forum," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-19.
    16. Stylos, Nikolaos & Vassiliadis, Chris A. & Bellou, Victoria & Andronikidis, Andreas, 2016. "Destination images, holistic images and personal normative beliefs: Predictors of intention to revisit a destination," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 40-60.
    17. Sarun Amatyakul & Kawpong Polyorat, 2017. "The Traits of City Personality: A Qualitative Study," International Journal of Business and Economic Affairs (IJBEA), Sana N. Maswadeh, vol. 2(6), pages 356-365.
    18. Mohammad Rashed Hasan Polas & Ratul Kumar Saha & Mosab I. Tabash, 2022. "How does tourist perception lead to tourist hesitation? Empirical evidence from Bangladesh," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 3659-3686, March.
    19. Carmela Iorio & Giuseppe Pandolfo & Antonio D’Ambrosio & Roberta Siciliano, 2020. "Mining big data in tourism," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 54(5), pages 1655-1669, December.
    20. Mohamed Abdalla Elsayed Hassan & Konstantina Zerva & Silvia Aulet, 2021. "Brand Personality Traits of World Heritage Sites: Text Mining Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-19, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:16:p:8874-:d:610735. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.