IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i13p7464-d588338.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Public Behavior as an Output of E-Government Service: The Role of New Technology Integrated in E-Government and Antecedent of Relationship Quality

Author

Listed:
  • Taqwa Hariguna

    (Departement of Information System, Universitas Amikom Purwokerto, Purwokerto 53127, Indonesia)

  • Athapol Ruangkanjanases

    (Chulalongkorn Business School, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand)

  • Sarmini

    (Departement of Information System, Universitas Amikom Purwokerto, Purwokerto 53127, Indonesia)

Abstract

Electronic government has played an essential role in citizen policy strategy, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic. As part of citizen and government interaction, companies can utilize electronic government facilities to establish direct communication and maintain service quality by integrating new technologies and facilities in electronic government which can provide service via online, embedded with social media integration, implemented with mobile service, using personalized user accounts, e-participation service integration, in combination with ongoing citizen information. Therefore, electronic government facilities must adapt and choose the right content to promote strong citizen relations, leading to citizen behavior to make long-term use of electronic government facilities. This study considered and integrated the latest technology from electronic government and associated it with connection quality. Sustainable motives and faithfulness were used to quantify the quality of citizen relations to electronic government facilities, which can influence the results of citizen behavior. The SmartPLS 2 software was used to quantify and estimate 425 online questionnaire surveys. The results showed that of the 12 hypotheses, eight hypotheses were declared to have a significant effect, consisting of H1, H2, H6–H8, and H10–H12, while the other four hypotheses were stated to have no significant effect, namely H3–H5, and H9. This study was used to guide the government as a provider of electronic government facilities to adapt and provide content following the dimensions of the latest technology to achieve goals and produce sustainable implementation.

Suggested Citation

  • Taqwa Hariguna & Athapol Ruangkanjanases & Sarmini, 2021. "Public Behavior as an Output of E-Government Service: The Role of New Technology Integrated in E-Government and Antecedent of Relationship Quality," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-20, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:13:p:7464-:d:588338
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/13/7464/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/13/7464/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Syed Ali Abbas, 2018. "Entrepreneurship and information technology businesses in economic crisis," Post-Print hal-01829732, HAL.
    2. Syed Ali Abbas, 2018. "Entrepreneurship and information technology businesses in economic crisis," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 5(3), pages 682-692, March.
    3. Anna Shevyakova & Anna Shevyakova & Eleonorа Munsh & Malika Arystan & Yelena Petrenko, 2021. "Competence development for Industry 4.0: Qualification requirements and solutions," Insights into Regional Development, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 3(1), pages 124-135, March.
    4. Chen, Shih-Chih & Lin, Chieh-Peng, 2019. "Understanding the effect of social media marketing activities: The mediation of social identification, perceived value, and satisfaction," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 22-32.
    5. Bonsón Ponte, Enrique & Carvajal-Trujillo, Elena & Escobar-Rodríguez, Tomás, 2015. "Influence of trust and perceived value on the intention to purchase travel online: Integrating the effects of assurance on trust antecedents," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 286-302.
    6. Khan, Sohrab & Umer, Rahila & Umer, Shumaila & Naqvi, Shabbar, 2021. "Antecedents of trust in using social media for E-government services: An empirical study in Pakistan," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    7. Andrei Vladimirovich Glotko & Aleksandra Grigorievna Polyakova & Aleksandra Grigorievna Polyakova & Mariya Yurievna Kuznetsova & Kseniya E. Kovalenko & Rustem Adamovich Shichiyakh & Margarita V. Melni, 2020. "Main trends of government regulation of sectoral digitalization," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 7(3), pages 2181-2195, March.
    8. Manuela Tvaronavičienė & Tomas Plėta & Silvia Della Casa & Juozas Latvys, 2020. "Cyber security management of critical energy infrastructure in national cybersecurity strategies: cases of USA, UK, France, Estonia and Lithuania," Post-Print hal-03298796, HAL.
    9. Bernd W. Wirtz & Oliver Tuna Kurtz, 2016. "Local e-government and user satisfaction with city portals – the citizens’ service preference perspective," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 13(3), pages 265-287, October.
    10. Pérez-Morote, Rosario & Pontones-Rosa, Carolina & Núñez-Chicharro, Montserrat, 2020. "The effects of e-government evaluation, trust and the digital divide in the levels of e-government use in European countries," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    11. Saïd Assar & Imed Boughzala & Isabelle Boydens, 2011. "Practical studies in e-government : best practices from around the world," Post-Print hal-00552918, HAL.
    12. Bogdan Anastasiei & Nicoleta Dospinescu, 2017. "Facebook Advertising, Relationship Between Types Of Message, Brand Attitude And Perceived Buying Risk," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 6, pages 18-26, December.
    13. Christopher Meyer & Christopher Meyer, 2020. "Reinforcing comparative monitoring of Smart Specialisation performance across European regions: transnational RIS3 observatory model as a tool for Smart Specialisation governance," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 8(2), pages 1386-1400, December.
    14. Rimma Sagiyeva & Aziza Zhuparova & Rashid Ruzanov & Raigul Doszhan & Askar Askerov, 2018. "Intellectual input of development by knowledge-based economy: problems of measuring in countries with developing markets," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 6(2), pages 711-728, December.
    15. Manuela TvaronaviÄ ienÄ— & Manuela TvaronaviÄ ienÄ— & Tomas PlÄ—ta & Silvia Della Casa & Juozas Latvys, 2020. "Cyber security management of critical energy infrastructure in national cybersecurity strategies: cases of USA, UK, France, Estonia and Lithuania," Insights into Regional Development, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 2(4), pages 802-813, December.
    16. Bejou, David & Wray, Barry & Ingram, Thomas N., 1996. "Determinants of relationship quality: An artificial neural network analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 137-143, June.
    17. Boles, James S. & Johnson, Julie T. & BarksdaleJr., Hiram C., 2000. "How Salespeople Build Quality Relationships:: A Replication and Extension," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 75-81, April.
    18. Yerkara Aymagambetov & Nadezhda Grazhevskaya & Ainur Тyngisheva, 2020. "Estimation the effectiveness of public governance of the health system in the context of sustainable development," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 7(4), pages 3309-3320, June.
    19. Anna Shevyakova & Eleonorа Munsh & Malika Arystan & Yelena Petrenko, 2021. "Competence development for Industry 4.0: Qualification requirements and solutions," Post-Print hal-03583868, HAL.
    20. Monika Adamczyk & Alina Betlej & Jan Gondek & Alina Ohotina, 2019. "Technology and sustainable development: towards the future?," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 6(4), pages 2003-2016, June.
    21. Hajli, M. Nick, 2014. "The role of social support on relationship quality and social commerce," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 17-27.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Johnson, Nathan & Turnbull, Benjamin & Reisslein, Martin, 2022. "Social media influence, trust, and conflict: An interview based study of leadership perceptions," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    2. Da-Hee Lim & Dae-Woong Lee, 2021. "Non-Face-to-Face Public Services and Perceptions of Public Organizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-15, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ardy Wibowo & Shih-Chih Chen & Uraiporn Wiangin & Yin Ma & Athapol Ruangkanjanases, 2020. "Customer Behavior as an Outcome of Social Media Marketing: The Role of Social Media Marketing Activity and Customer Experience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-18, December.
    2. Untung Rahardja & Tanaporn Hongsuchon & Taqwa Hariguna & Athapol Ruangkanjanases, 2021. "Understanding Impact Sustainable Intention of S-Commerce Activities: The Role of Customer Experiences, Perceived Value, and Mediation of Relationship Quality," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-20, October.
    3. Beier, Grischa & Matthess, Marcel & Shuttleworth, Luke & Guan, Ting & de Oliveira Pereira Grudzien, David Iubel & Xue, Bing & Pinheiro de Lima, Edson & Chen, Ling, 2022. "Implications of Industry 4.0 on industrial employment: A comparative survey from Brazilian, Chinese, and German practitioners," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    4. Youssef Tabsh & Vida Davidavičienė, 2019. "Effects of ICT’s on energy management systems," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 6(4), pages 2194-2206, June.
    5. Oluyomi A. Osobajo & Ioannis Koliousis & Heather McLaughlin, 2021. "Making sense of maritime supply chain: a relationship marketing approach," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 1-17, December.
    6. Igor Denisov & Yelena Petrenko & Irina Koretskaya & Stanislav Benčič, 2021. "The Gameover in Universities Education Management during the Pandemic COVID-19: Challenges to Sustainable Development in a Digitalized Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1, July.
    7. Shahin Bayramov & Iurii Prokazov & Sergey Kondrashev & Jan Kowalik, 2021. "Household Electricity Generation as a Way of Energy Independence of States—Social Context of Energy Management," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-19, June.
    8. Shah Muhammad Kamran & Mahvish Kanwal Khaskhely & Abdelmohsen A. Nassani & Mohamed Haffar & Muhammad Moinuddin Qazi Abro, 2022. "Social Entrepreneurship Opportunities via Distant Socialization and Social Value Creation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-25, March.
    9. Aneta Wysokińśka-Senkus & Justyna Górna, 2021. "Towards sustainable development: risk management for organizational security," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 8(3), pages 527-544, March.
    10. Armando Luis Vieira, 2009. "Business-To-Business Relationship Quality," Portuguese Journal of Management Studies, ISEG, Universidade de Lisboa, vol. 0(3), pages 197-216.
    11. Agnieszka Parkitna, 2021. "Safe Business in a Pandemic Risk Environment," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2B), pages 68-77.
    12. Liene Leikuma-Rimicane & Vera Komarova & Jelena Lonska & Natalya Selivanova-Fyodorova & Inta Ostrovska, 2021. "The role of talent in the economic development of countries in the modern world," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 9(2), pages 488-507, December.
    13. Wadim Strielkowski & Lubomír Civín & Elena Tarkhanova & Manuela Tvaronavičienė & Yelena Petrenko, 2021. "Renewable Energy in the Sustainable Development of Electrical Power Sector: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-24, December.
    14. Marko Milojević & Mariusz Urbański & Ivica Terzić & Valeriy Prasolov, 2020. "Impact of Non-Financial Factors on the Effectiveness of Audits in Energy Companies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-17, November.
    15. Nadine Bachmann & Shailesh Tripathi & Manuel Brunner & Herbert Jodlbauer, 2022. "The Contribution of Data-Driven Technologies in Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-33, February.
    16. Kristina Samašonok & Margarita Išoraitė & Lina Žirnelė, 2020. "Education of entrepreneurship by participation in a business simulation enterprise activities: conditions of effectiveness and opportunities for improvement," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 7(4), pages 3122-3144, June.
    17. Alzaidi, Maram Saeed & Agag, Gomaa, 2022. "The role of trust and privacy concerns in using social media for e-retail services: The moderating role of COVID-19," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    18. Mahyar Kamali Saraji & Dalia Streimikiene & Grigorios L. Kyriakopoulos, 2021. "Fermatean Fuzzy CRITIC-COPRAS Method for Evaluating the Challenges to Industry 4.0 Adoption for a Sustainable Digital Transformation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-20, August.
    19. Antonín Korauš & Lucia Kurilovská & Patrícia Krásná & Miroslav Gombár & Patrik Javorčík, 2024. "Perception of hybrid threats by students of selected universities and building effective resistance against their effects," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 11(3), pages 358-374, March.
    20. Dong, Xuefan & Lian, Ying, 2021. "A review of social media-based public opinion analyses: Challenges and recommendations," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:13:p:7464-:d:588338. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.