IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i12p6560-d571366.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Methodology of Urban Safety and Security Assessment Based on the Overall Risk Management Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Guohua Chen

    (Institute of Safety Science & Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China
    Guangdong Provincial Science and Technology Collaborative Innovation Center for Work Safety, Guangzhou 510640, China)

  • Qin Yang

    (Institute of Safety Science & Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China
    Guangdong Provincial Science and Technology Collaborative Innovation Center for Work Safety, Guangzhou 510640, China)

  • Xuexi Chen

    (Institute of Safety Science & Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China
    Guangdong Provincial Science and Technology Collaborative Innovation Center for Work Safety, Guangzhou 510640, China)

  • Kongxing Huang

    (Institute of Safety Science & Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China
    Guangdong Provincial Science and Technology Collaborative Innovation Center for Work Safety, Guangzhou 510640, China)

  • Tao Zeng

    (Institute of Safety Science & Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China
    Guangdong Provincial Science and Technology Collaborative Innovation Center for Work Safety, Guangzhou 510640, China)

  • Zhi Yuan

    (Guangdong Provincial Science and Technology Collaborative Innovation Center for Work Safety, Guangzhou 510640, China
    Guangdong Academy of Safety Science and Technology, Guangzhou 510060, China)

Abstract

With the expansion of urbanization, the interaction between different hazards has become increasing evident. In order to promote sustainable development of urban areas, it is particularly important to systematically analyze and evaluate urban safety and security under the coupling effect of multi-hazard risks. In response to the practical needs of urban safety and security assessment practice, this paper constructs an application-oriented urban safety and security quantitative assessment methodology. First, following the comprehensive risk management perspective, the logical relationship between urban safety and security elements is analyzed. It proposes “comprehensive screening, key analysis, and comprehensive evaluation” as a new assessment concept. Second, a system of urban safety and security assessment methods consisting of a weighting method and a function model is constructed. The function model includes two sub-models: a quantitative risk assessment model that considers triggering effects and a quantitative assessment model of emergency capacity that considers the evolution of emergencies. Finally, the method was applied to a coastal urban area in south China. The case study proved that the proposed method system can not only effectively evaluate various disaster risks and emergency capacity but also provide evidence for the formulation and implementation of urban safety and security management measures.

Suggested Citation

  • Guohua Chen & Qin Yang & Xuexi Chen & Kongxing Huang & Tao Zeng & Zhi Yuan, 2021. "Methodology of Urban Safety and Security Assessment Based on the Overall Risk Management Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-26, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:12:p:6560-:d:571366
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/12/6560/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/12/6560/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Narissara Nuthammachot & Dimitris Stratoulias, 2021. "Multi-criteria decision analysis for forest fire risk assessment by coupling AHP and GIS: method and case study," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(12), pages 17443-17458, December.
    2. Li, Jian & Chen, Changkun, 2014. "Modeling the dynamics of disaster evolution along causality networks with cycle chains," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 401(C), pages 251-264.
    3. Tiodora Siagian & Purhadi Purhadi & Suhartono Suhartono & Hamonangan Ritonga, 2014. "Social vulnerability to natural hazards in Indonesia: driving factors and policy implications," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 70(2), pages 1603-1617, January.
    4. Kameshwar, Sabarethinam & Cox, Daniel T. & Barbosa, Andre R. & Farokhnia, Karim & Park, Hyoungsu & Alam, Mohammad S. & van de Lindt, John W., 2019. "Probabilistic decision-support framework for community resilience: Incorporating multi-hazards, infrastructure interdependencies, and resilience goals in a Bayesian network," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    5. Dyah R. Hizbaron & Muhammad Baiquni & Junun Sartohadi & R. Rijanta, 2012. "Urban Vulnerability in Bantul District, Indonesia—Towards Safer and Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 4(9), pages 1-16, August.
    6. H. Duzgun & M. Yucemen & H. Kalaycioglu & K. Celik & S. Kemec & K. Ertugay & A. Deniz, 2011. "An integrated earthquake vulnerability assessment framework for urban areas," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 59(2), pages 917-947, November.
    7. Maria do Céu Almeida & Maria João Telhado & Marco Morais & João Barreiro & Ruth Lopes, 2020. "Urban Resilience to Flooding: Triangulation of Methods for Hazard Identification in Urban Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-18, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yunfeng Yang & Guohua Chen & Yuanfei Zhao, 2023. "A Quantitative Framework for Propagation Paths of Natech Domino Effects in Chemical Industrial Parks: Part I—Failure Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-17, May.
    2. Chenlei Guan & Damin Dong & Feng Shen & Xin Gao & Linyan Chen, 2022. "Hierarchical Structure Model of Safety Risk Factors in New Coastal Towns: A Systematic Analysis Using the DEMATEL-ISM-SNA Method," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-17, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hongrui Wen & Qiaozhen Guo & Yuhuai Zeng & Zepeng Wu & Zhenhui Sun, 2022. "Study on forest fire risk in Conghua district of Guangzhou city based on multi-source data," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 114(3), pages 3163-3183, December.
    2. Dyah Rahmawati Hizbaron & Dina Ruslanjari & Djati Mardiatno, 2021. "Amidst Covid-19 Pandemic: An Adaptive Disaster Governance in Yogyakarta, Indonesia," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-18, March.
    3. Su, Jia & Huang, Guangqiu, 2018. "Simulation and analysis of ecosystem vulnerability with cascading spread caused by dust migration based on object function GeoPetri net," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 379(C), pages 54-72.
    4. Mujjuni, F. & Betts, T. & To, L.S. & Blanchard, R.E., 2021. "Resilience a means to development: A resilience assessment framework and a catalogue of indicators," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    5. Xiaorui Zhang & Zhenbo Wang & Jing Lin, 2015. "GIS Based Measurement and Regulatory Zoning of Urban Ecological Vulnerability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(8), pages 1-19, July.
    6. Dylan Sanderson & Sabarethinam Kameshwar & Nathanael Rosenheim & Daniel Cox, 2021. "Deaggregation of multi-hazard damages, losses, risks, and connectivity: an application to the joint seismic-tsunami hazard at Seaside, Oregon," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 109(2), pages 1821-1847, November.
    7. Kumar, Shantanu & Mehany, Mohammed S.Hashem M., 2022. "A standardized framework for quantitative assessment of cities’ socioeconomic resilience and its improvement measures," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    8. Mohsen Alizadeh & Esmaeil Alizadeh & Sara Asadollahpour Kotenaee & Himan Shahabi & Amin Beiranvand Pour & Mahdi Panahi & Baharin Bin Ahmad & Lee Saro, 2018. "Social Vulnerability Assessment Using Artificial Neural Network (ANN) Model for Earthquake Hazard in Tabriz City, Iran," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-23, September.
    9. Dao Duy Minh & Philippe Lebailly & Nguyen Dang Hao & Philippe Burny & Ho Thi Minh Hop, 2019. "The Dynamics of Livelihood Vulnerability Index at Farm Household Level: An Empirical Analysis of the Coastal Sandy Zone in Thua Thien Hue Province, Vietnam," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 9(5), pages 77-89.
    10. Omar Hamdy & Hanan Gaber & Mohamed S. Abdalzaher & Mahmoud Elhadidy, 2022. "Identifying Exposure of Urban Area to Certain Seismic Hazard Using Machine Learning and GIS: A Case Study of Greater Cairo," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-24, August.
    11. Zhen Xu & Xinzheng Lu & Hong Guan & Bo Han & Aizhu Ren, 2014. "Seismic damage simulation in urban areas based on a high-fidelity structural model and a physics engine," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 71(3), pages 1679-1693, April.
    12. Fx Anjar Tri Laksono & Asmoro Widagdo & Maulana Rizki Aditama & Muhammad Rifky Fauzan & János Kovács, 2022. "Tsunami Hazard Zone and Multiple Scenarios of Tsunami Evacuation Route at Jetis Beach, Cilacap Regency, Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-19, February.
    13. Seunghoo Jeong & Byeong Je Kim & Young‐Joo Lee & Ji‐Bum Chung & Sung‐Han Sim, 2020. "Individual Disaster Assistance For Socially Vulnerable People: Lessons Learned From the Pohang Earthquake in the Republic of Korea," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(11), pages 2373-2389, November.
    14. Hoang Long Nguyen & Rajendra Akerkar, 2020. "Modelling, Measuring, and Visualising Community Resilience: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-26, September.
    15. João Barreiro & Ruth Lopes & Filipa Ferreira & Rita Brito & Maria João Telhado & José Saldanha Matos & Rafaela Saldanha Matos, 2020. "Assessing Urban Resilience in Complex and Dynamic Systems: The RESCCUE Project Approach in Lisbon Research Site," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-15, October.
    16. Goerlandt, Floris & Islam, Samsul, 2021. "A Bayesian Network risk model for estimating coastal maritime transportation delays following an earthquake in British Columbia," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    17. Md. Mashrur Rahman & Uttama Barua & Farzana Khatun & Ishrat Islam & Rezwana Rafiq, 2018. "Participatory Vulnerability Reduction (PVR): an urban community-based approach for earthquake management," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 93(3), pages 1479-1505, September.
    18. M. Hajibabaee & K. Amini-Hosseini & M. Ghayamghamian, 2014. "Earthquake risk assessment in urban fabrics based on physical, socioeconomic and response capacity parameters (a case study: Tehran city)," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 74(3), pages 2229-2250, December.
    19. He, Xiang & Yuan, Yongbo, 2022. "Revisiting driving factor influences on uncertain cascading disaster evolutions: From perspective of global sensitivity," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 597(C).
    20. Azucena Román-de la Sancha & Rodolfo Silva, 2020. "Multivariable Analysis of Transport Network Seismic Performance: Mexico City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-40, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:12:p:6560-:d:571366. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.