IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i11p6369-d568401.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assignment of Freight Truck Shipment on the U.S. Highway Network

Author

Listed:
  • Taesung Hwang

    (Asia Pacific School of Logistics, Inha University, Incheon 22212, Korea)

Abstract

With the ever-increasing demand for freight movements, nationwide freight shipments between geographical regions by freight trucks need to be investigated since they comprise the largest share of total freight movements in the United States. To this end, the procedures for freight truck shipment demand network assignment on the entire U.S. highway network considering congestion effect are discussed, and the results are explained in detail, with visual illustrations. A fundamental traffic assignment model with a convex combinations algorithm is proposed to solve the nationwide freight truck shipment assignment problem under the user equilibrium principle. A link cost function is modified, considering the traffic volume that already exists on U.S. highways. A case study is conducted using big data including the entire U.S. highway network and freight shipment information in 2007. Total and average freight shipment costs for both truck and rail transportation for a specific origin–destination pair in the database are computed to compare the characteristics of these two major freight transportation modes in the United States. Application of the proposed model could be possible to address many other related problems, such as improvement of highway infrastructure, and reductions in traffic congestion and vehicle emissions.

Suggested Citation

  • Taesung Hwang, 2021. "Assignment of Freight Truck Shipment on the U.S. Highway Network," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-11, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:11:p:6369-:d:568401
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/11/6369/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/11/6369/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Warren B. Powell & Yosef Sheffi, 1982. "The Convergence of Equilibrium Algorithms with Predetermined Step Sizes," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(1), pages 45-55, February.
    2. Bai, Yun & Hwang, Taesung & Kang, Seungmo & Ouyang, Yanfeng, 2011. "Biofuel refinery location and supply chain planning under traffic congestion," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 162-175, January.
    3. Jayakrishnan, R. & Tsai, Wei T. & Prashker, Joseph N. & Rajadhyaksha, Subodh, 1994. "A Faster Path-Based Algorithm for Traffic Assignment," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt2hf4541x, University of California Transportation Center.
    4. Weintraub, Andrés & Ortiz, Carmen & González, Jaime, 1985. "Accelerating convergence of the Frank-Wolfe algorithm," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 19(2), pages 113-122, April.
    5. Fukushima, Masao, 1984. "A modified Frank-Wolfe algorithm for solving the traffic assignment problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 169-177, April.
    6. Torbjörn Larsson & Michael Patriksson, 1992. "Simplicial Decomposition with Disaggregated Representation for the Traffic Assignment Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(1), pages 4-17, February.
    7. Marguerite Frank & Philip Wolfe, 1956. "An algorithm for quadratic programming," Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 3(1‐2), pages 95-110, March.
    8. Teodor Crainic & Jacques-A. Ferland & Jean-Marc Rousseau, 1984. "A Tactical Planning Model for Rail Freight Transportation," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(2), pages 165-184, May.
    9. Hillel Bar-Gera, 2002. "Origin-Based Algorithm for the Traffic Assignment Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(4), pages 398-417, November.
    10. Sungwon Lee & Taesung Hwang, 2018. "Estimating Emissions from Regional Freight Delivery under Different Urban Development Scenarios," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-14, April.
    11. Y. Arezki & D. Van Vliet, 1990. "A Full Analytical Implementation of the PARTAN/Frank–Wolfe Algorithm for Equilibrium Assignment," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(1), pages 58-62, February.
    12. Taesung Hwang & Yanfeng Ouyang, 2015. "Urban Freight Truck Routing under Stochastic Congestion and Emission Considerations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(6), pages 1-16, May.
    13. Dial, Robert B., 2006. "A path-based user-equilibrium traffic assignment algorithm that obviates path storage and enumeration," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 40(10), pages 917-936, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wang, Shuaian & Yan, Ran, 2023. "Fundamental challenge and solution methods in prescriptive analytics for freight transportation," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maria Mitradjieva & Per Olov Lindberg, 2013. "The Stiff Is Moving---Conjugate Direction Frank-Wolfe Methods with Applications to Traffic Assignment ," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(2), pages 280-293, May.
    2. Liu, Zhiyuan & Chen, Xinyuan & Hu, Jintao & Wang, Shuaian & Zhang, Kai & Zhang, Honggang, 2023. "An alternating direction method of multipliers for solving user equilibrium problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 310(3), pages 1072-1084.
    3. Chou, Chang-Chi & Chiang, Wen-Chu & Chen, Albert Y., 2022. "Emergency medical response in mass casualty incidents considering the traffic congestions in proximity on-site and hospital delays," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    4. Xie, Chi, 2016. "New insights and improvements of using paired alternative segments for traffic assignmentAuthor-Name: Xie, Jun," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 93(PA), pages 406-424.
    5. Xu, Zhandong & Xie, Jun & Liu, Xiaobo & Nie, Yu (Marco), 2020. "Hyperpath-based algorithms for the transit equilibrium assignment problem," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    6. Nie, Yu (Marco), 2010. "A class of bush-based algorithms for the traffic assignment problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 73-89, January.
    7. Zheng, Hong & Peeta, Srinivas, 2014. "Cost scaling based successive approximation algorithm for the traffic assignment problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 17-30.
    8. Yu (Marco) Nie, 2012. "A Note on Bar-Gera's Algorithm for the Origin-Based Traffic Assignment Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(1), pages 27-38, February.
    9. Liu, Zhiyuan & Zhang, Honggang & Zhang, Kai & Zhou, Zihan, 2023. "Integrating alternating direction method of multipliers and bush for solving the traffic assignment problem," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    10. Jafari, Ehsan & Pandey, Venktesh & Boyles, Stephen D., 2017. "A decomposition approach to the static traffic assignment problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 270-296.
    11. Xie, Jun & Nie, Yu (Marco) & Yang, Xiaoguang, 2013. "Quadratic approximation and convergence of some bush-based algorithms for the traffic assignment problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 15-30.
    12. Bar-Gera, Hillel, 2010. "Traffic assignment by paired alternative segments," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 44(8-9), pages 1022-1046, September.
    13. Rambha, Tarun & Boyles, Stephen D., 2016. "Dynamic pricing in discrete time stochastic day-to-day route choice models," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 92(PA), pages 104-118.
    14. David Di Lorenzo & Alessandro Galligari & Marco Sciandrone, 2015. "A convergent and efficient decomposition method for the traffic assignment problem," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 60(1), pages 151-170, January.
    15. Meng Li & Guowei Hua & Haijun Huang, 2018. "A Multi-Modal Route Choice Model with Ridesharing and Public Transit," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-14, November.
    16. Shen, Wei & Wynter, Laura, 2012. "A new one-level convex optimization approach for estimating origin–destination demand," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 46(10), pages 1535-1555.
    17. Li, Li & Li, Xiaopeng, 2019. "Parsimonious trajectory design of connected automated traffic," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 1-21.
    18. Bai, Yun & Hwang, Taesung & Kang, Seungmo & Ouyang, Yanfeng, 2011. "Biofuel refinery location and supply chain planning under traffic congestion," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 162-175, January.
    19. Zhang, Honggang & Liu, Zhiyuan & Wang, Jian & Wu, Yunchi, 2023. "A novel flow update policy in solving traffic assignment problems: Successive over relaxation iteration method," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    20. Smith, Mike & Mounce, Richard, 2011. "A splitting rate model of traffic re-routeing and traffic control," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(9), pages 1389-1409.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:11:p:6369-:d:568401. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.