IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i10p5699-d557756.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Café and Restaurant under My Home: Predicting Urban Commercialization through Machine Learning

Author

Listed:
  • Seung-Chul Noh

    (Department of Public Administration, Hanshin University, Osan 18101, Korea)

  • Jung-Ho Park

    (SURE Education Research Group, Department of Smart City, Chung-Ang University, Seoul 06974, Korea)

Abstract

The small commercial stores opening in housing structures in Seoul have been soaring since the beginning of this century. While commercialization generally increases urban vitality and achieves land use mix, cafés and restaurants in low-rise residential areas may attract numerous passenger populations, with increased noise and crimes, in the residential area. The urban commercialization is so fast and prevalent that neither urban researchers nor policymakers can respond to it timely without a practical prediction tool. Focusing on cafés and restaurants, we propose an XGBoost machine learning model that can predict commercial store openings in urban residential areas and further play the role of an early warning system. Our findings highlight a large degree of difference in the predictor importance between the variables used in our machine learning model. The most important predictor relates to land price, indicating that economic motivation leads to the conversion of urban housing to small cafés and restaurants. The Mapo neighborhood is predicted to be the most prone to the commercialization of urban housing, therefore, its urgency to be prepared against expected commercialization deserves underscoring. Overall, our results show that the machine learning approach can be applied to predict changes in land uses and contribute to timely policy designs in rapidly changing urban context.

Suggested Citation

  • Seung-Chul Noh & Jung-Ho Park, 2021. "Café and Restaurant under My Home: Predicting Urban Commercialization through Machine Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-22, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:10:p:5699-:d:557756
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/10/5699/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/10/5699/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shin, Hyun Bang & Kim, Soo-Hyun, 2016. "The developmental state, speculative urbanisation and the politics of displacement in gentrifying Seoul," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 60439, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Keunhyun Park & Reid Ewing & Sadegh Sabouri & Dong-ah Choi & Shima Hamidi & Guang Tian, 2020. "Guidelines for a Polycentric Region to Reduce Vehicle Use and Increase Walking and Transit Use," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 86(2), pages 236-249, April.
    3. Sue Easton & Loretta Lees & Phil Hubbard & Nicholas Tate, 2020. "Measuring and mapping displacement: The problem of quantification in the battle against gentrification," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(2), pages 286-306, February.
    4. José Carpio-Pinedo & Manuel Benito-Moreno & Patxi J. Lamíquiz-Daudén, 2021. "Beyond land use mix, walkable trips. An approach based on parcel-level land use data and network analysis," Journal of Maps, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(1), pages 23-30, January.
    5. Jonathan Reades & Jordan De Souza & Phil Hubbard, 2019. "Understanding urban gentrification through machine learning," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(5), pages 922-942, April.
    6. Jose Carpio-Pinedo & Sonia De Gregorio Hurtado & Inés Sánchez De Madariaga, 2019. "Gender Mainstreaming in Urban Planning: The Potential of Geographic Information Systems and Open Data Sources," Planning Theory & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(2), pages 221-240, March.
    7. Benjamin Preis & Aarthi Janakiraman & Alex Bob & Justin Steil, 2021. "Mapping gentrification and displacement pressure: An exploration of four distinct methodologies," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(2), pages 405-424, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dian Shao & Weiting Xiong, 2022. "Does High Spatial Density Imply High Population Density? Spatial Mechanism of Population Density Distribution Based on Population–Space Imbalance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-22, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jan Voltaire Vergara & Maria Y Rodriguez & Jonathan Phillips & Ehren Dohler & Melissa L Villodas & Amy Blank Wilson & Kenneth Joseph, 2024. "An evaluation framework for predictive models of neighbourhood change with applications to predicting residential sales in Buffalo, NY," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 61(5), pages 838-858, April.
    2. devin michelle bunten & Benjamin Preis & Shifrah Aron-Dine, 2024. "Re-measuring gentrification," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 61(1), pages 20-39, January.
    3. Zheng Wang & Jie Shen & Xiang Luo, 2023. "Can residents regain their community relations after resettlement? Insights from Shanghai," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 60(5), pages 962-980, April.
    4. Dwayne Marshall Baker, 2024. "Burden or benefit: Is retail marijuana facility siting influenced by LULU- or gentrification-related neighbourhood characteristics?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 61(6), pages 1049-1070, May.
    5. Na’Taki Osborne Jelks & Viniece Jennings & Alessandro Rigolon, 2021. "Green Gentrification and Health: A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-23, January.
    6. Yasser Jezzini & Ghiwa Assaf & Rayan H. Assaad, 2023. "Models and Methods for Quantifying the Environmental, Economic, and Social Benefits and Challenges of Green Infrastructure: A Critical Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-40, May.
    7. Emma Colven, 2023. "A political ecology of speculative urbanism: The role of financial and environmental speculation in Jakarta’s water crisis," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 55(2), pages 490-510, March.
    8. Jonathan Reades, 2020. "Teaching on Jupyter: Using notebooks to accelerate learning and curriculum development," REGION, European Regional Science Association, vol. 7, pages 21-34.
    9. Charles R. Collins & Forrest Stuart & Patrick Janulis, 2022. "Policing gentrification or policing displacement? Testing the relationship between order maintenance policing and neighbourhood change in Los Angeles," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 59(2), pages 414-433, February.
    10. Choi, Chang Gyu & Lee, Sugie & Kim, Heungsoon & Seong, Eun Yeong, 2019. "Critical junctures and path dependence in urban planning and housing policy: A review of greenbelts and New Towns in Korea’s Seoul metropolitan area," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 195-204.
    11. Alessandro Rigolon & Timothy Collins, 2023. "The green gentrification cycle," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 60(4), pages 770-785, March.
    12. Ismail, Muhammad & Warsame, Abukar & Wilhelmsson, Mats, 2020. "Measuring Gentrification with Getis-Ord Statistics and Its Effect on Housing Prices in Neighboring Areas: The Case of Stockholm," Working Paper Series 20/19, Royal Institute of Technology, Department of Real Estate and Construction Management & Banking and Finance.
    13. Zhou, You & Zhang, Lingzhu & Chiaradia, Alain J F, 2021. "An adaptation of reference class forecasting for the assessment of large-scale urban planning vision, a SEM-ANN approach to the case of Hong Kong Lantau tomorrow," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    14. Spandagos, Constantine & Tovar Reaños, Miguel & Lynch, Muireann Á, 2023. "Energy poverty prediction and effective targeting for just transitions with machine learning," Papers WP762, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI).
    15. Karen Chapple & Ate Poorthuis & Matthew Zook & Eva Phillips, 2022. "Monitoring streets through tweets: Using user-generated geographic information to predict gentrification and displacement," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 49(2), pages 704-721, February.
    16. Francesco Balducci, 2021. "Mapping the invisibles: Using non-conventional point-level data to analyse residential patterns of deprived people in a mid-sized city," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(8), pages 1634-1654, June.
    17. Yinnon Geva & Gillad Rosen, 2022. "A win-win situation? Urban regeneration and the paradox of homeowner displacement," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 54(1), pages 67-83, February.
    18. Ding, Chuan & Cao, Xinyu & Yu, Bin & Ju, Yang, 2021. "Non-linear associations between zonal built environment attributes and transit commuting mode choice accounting for spatial heterogeneity," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 22-35.
    19. Klink, Jeroen & Stroher, Laisa Eleonora Maróstica, 2017. "The making of urban financialization? An exploration of brazilian urban partnership operations with building certificates," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 519-528.
    20. Daeyoung Kwon & Sung Eun Sally Oh & Sangwon Choi & Brian H. S. Kim, 2023. "Viability of compact cities in the post-COVID-19 era: subway ridership variations in Seoul Korea," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 71(1), pages 175-203, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:10:p:5699-:d:557756. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.