IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v54y2022i1p67-83.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A win-win situation? Urban regeneration and the paradox of homeowner displacement

Author

Listed:
  • Yinnon Geva

    (Department of Geography, 26742Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel)

  • Gillad Rosen

    (Department of Geography, 26742Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel)

Abstract

This paper examines urban regeneration outcomes for homeowners through a mixed-methods analysis of population change in six redevelopment sites. Israel's national urban regeneration policy presents itself as a ‘win-win’ mechanism, claiming that it mitigates displacement. This claim is tested and discussed through the theoretical lens of state-led gentrification and displacement. The Israeli program relies on contractual agreements between private homeowners and developers and provides homeowners with newly built high-rise condominium units. Consequently, homeowners can choose how to capitalize on their new property – whether to inhabit, let or sell. We argue that their choice reflects the preferences and varied capabilities of owners. While homeowners are relatively protected from direct displacement, the variance in owner capabilities may lead to economic pressures that chiefly impact vulnerable low-income owners. We suggest that the Israeli model of sharing the benefits from housing commodification glosses over the capability gap and frames potential displacement pressures as market choice features.

Suggested Citation

  • Yinnon Geva & Gillad Rosen, 2022. "A win-win situation? Urban regeneration and the paradox of homeowner displacement," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 54(1), pages 67-83, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:54:y:2022:i:1:p:67-83
    DOI: 10.1177/0308518X211050079
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0308518X211050079
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0308518X211050079?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kathy Arthurson & Iris Levin & Anna Ziersch, 2015. "Social mix, ‘[A] very, very good idea in a vacuum but you have to do it properly!’ Exploring social mix in a right to the city framework," International Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(4), pages 418-435, October.
    2. Susan J. Smith, 2015. "Owner occupation: at home in a spatial, financial paradox," European Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 15(1), pages 61-83, January.
    3. Sue Easton & Loretta Lees & Phil Hubbard & Nicholas Tate, 2020. "Measuring and mapping displacement: The problem of quantification in the battle against gentrification," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(2), pages 286-306, February.
    4. Kathy Arthurson & Iris Levin & Anna Ziersch, 2015. "Social mix, ‘[A] very, very good idea in a vacuum but you have to do it properly!’ Exploring social mix in a right to the city framework," European Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 15(4), pages 418-435, October.
    5. Rachel Friedman & Gillad Rosen, 2020. "The face of affordable housing in a neoliberal paradigm," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(5), pages 959-975, April.
    6. Jason Hackworth & Neil Smith, 2001. "The changing state of gentrification," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 92(4), pages 464-477, November.
    7. Susan J. Smith, 2015. "Owner occupation: at home in a spatial, financial paradox," International Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(1), pages 61-83, January.
    8. Margalit, Talia & Mualam, Nir, 2020. "Selective rescaling, inequality and popular growth coalitions: The case of the Israeli national plan for earthquake preparedness," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    9. Oren Yiftachel, 2020. "From displacement to displaceability," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(1-2), pages 151-165, March.
    10. Hila Zaban, 2020. "The real estate foothold in the Holy Land: Transnational gentrification in Jerusalem," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(15), pages 3116-3134, November.
    11. Lawrence J. Vale & Shomon Shamsuddin, 2017. "All Mixed Up: Making Sense of Mixed-Income Housing Developments," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 83(1), pages 56-67, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tsahor, Michal & Katoshevski-Cavari, Rachel & Alfasi, Nurit, 2023. "Assessing urban adaptability: The key is in the land use plan," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    2. Can Kara & Aminreza Iranmanesh, 2022. "Modelling and Assessing Sustainable Urban Regeneration for Historic Urban Quarters via Analytical Hierarchy Process," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-20, December.
    3. Nachmany, Harel & Hananel, Ravit, 2023. "The Urban Renewal Matrix," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Steffen Wetzstein, 2017. "The global urban housing affordability crisis," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(14), pages 3159-3177, November.
    2. Isil Erol, 2019. "New Geographies of Residential Capitalism: Financialization of the Turkish Housing Market Since the Early 2000s," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(4), pages 724-740, July.
    3. Ismail, Muhammad & Warsame, Abukar & Wilhelmsson, Mats, 2020. "Measuring Gentrification with Getis-Ord Statistics and Its Effect on Housing Prices in Neighboring Areas: The Case of Stockholm," Working Paper Series 20/19, Royal Institute of Technology, Department of Real Estate and Construction Management & Banking and Finance.
    4. Wang, Hao & Zhao, Yizhu & Gao, Xichen & Gao, Boyang, 2021. "Collaborative decision-making for urban regeneration: A literature review and bibliometric analysis," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    5. Rachel Ong ViforJ & William A.V. Clark & Susan J. Smith & Gavin A. Wood & William Lisowski & N.T. Khuong Truong & Melek Cigdem, 2021. "Tenure transitions at the edges of ownership: Reinforcing or challenging the status quo?," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 53(8), pages 1993-2011, November.
    6. French, Declan & McKillop, Donal & Sharma, Tripti, 2018. "What determines UK housing equity withdrawal in later life?," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 143-154.
    7. Nicole Cook & Kristian Ruming, 2021. "The financialisation of housing and the rise of the investor-activist," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(10), pages 2023-2039, August.
    8. Andrea Pollio & Liam Magee & Ien Ang & David Rowe & Deborah Stevenson & Teresa Swist & Alexandra Wong, 2021. "SURVIVING SUPERGENTRIFICATION IN INNER CITY SYDNEY: Adaptive Spaces and Makeshift Economies of Cultural Production," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(5), pages 778-794, September.
    9. Brett Christophers, 2021. "A tale of two inequalities: Housing-wealth inequality and tenure inequality," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 53(3), pages 573-594, May.
    10. David J Madden, 2018. "Pushed off the map: Toponymy and the politics of place in New York City," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(8), pages 1599-1614, June.
    11. Ingmar Pastak & Anneli KÄHRIK, 2021. "SYMBOLIC DISPLACEMENT REVISITED: Place‐making Narratives in Gentrifying Neighbourhoods of Tallinn," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(5), pages 814-834, September.
    12. Hyun Bang Shin & Loretta Lees & Ernesto López-Morales, 2016. "Introduction: Locating gentrification in the Global East," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(3), pages 455-470, February.
    13. Benjamin F Teresa, 2016. "Managing fictitious capital: The legal geography of investment and political struggle in rental housing in New York City," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 48(3), pages 465-484, March.
    14. Ingmar Pastak & Eneli Kindsiko & Tiit Tammaru & Reinout Kleinhans & Maarten Van Ham, 2019. "Commercial Gentrification in Post‐Industrial Neighbourhoods: A Dynamic View From an Entrepreneur’s Perspective," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 110(5), pages 588-604, December.
    15. Zheng Wang & Jie Shen & Xiang Luo, 2023. "Can residents regain their community relations after resettlement? Insights from Shanghai," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 60(5), pages 962-980, April.
    16. Loretta Lees, 2003. "Super-gentrification: The Case of Brooklyn Heights, New York City," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 40(12), pages 2487-2509, November.
    17. Andrew Harris, 2008. "From London to Mumbai and Back Again: Gentrification and Public Policy in Comparative Perspective," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 45(12), pages 2407-2428, November.
    18. Lin Jiang & Yani Lai & Ke Chen & Xiao Tang, 2022. "What Drives Urban Village Redevelopment in China? A Survey of Literature Based on Web of Science Core Collection Database," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-16, April.
    19. Lynda Cheshire & Robin Fitzgerald & Yan Liu, 2019. "Neighbourhood change and neighbour complaints: How gentrification and densification influence the prevalence of problems between neighbours," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(6), pages 1093-1112, May.
    20. Hyun Bang Shin & Soo-Hyun Kim, 2016. "The developmental state, speculative urbanisation and the politics of displacement in gentrifying Seoul," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(3), pages 540-559, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:54:y:2022:i:1:p:67-83. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.