IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i9p3585-d351603.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring Issues within Post-Olympic Games Legacy Governance: The Case of the 2018 PyeongChang Winter Olympic Games

Author

Listed:
  • Jinsu Byun

    (Department of Kinesiology, University of Georgia, 333 Ramsey Center 330 River Road, Athens, GA 30602-6554, USA)

  • Becca Leopkey

    (Department of Kinesiology, University of Georgia, 333 Ramsey Center 330 River Road, Athens, GA 30602-6554, USA)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to explore issues in post-Olympic Games legacy governance by examining the case of the 2018 PyeongChang Winter Olympics. Using a combination of the polity, politics, and policy governance dimensions and the issues management literature, a case was built using archival material and semi-structured interviews. The findings highlight 10 issues related to the three dimensions of post-Games legacy governance (legal, accountability, context, funding, conflicting values or interests, venue, coordination, participation, pre-event planning, and policy momentum). The relationships between the identified issues and perceived gaps among stakeholders are also presented. A model of post-sport event legacy governance that highlights the multidimensionality of the governance system is provided.

Suggested Citation

  • Jinsu Byun & Becca Leopkey, 2020. "Exploring Issues within Post-Olympic Games Legacy Governance: The Case of the 2018 PyeongChang Winter Olympic Games," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-25, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:9:p:3585-:d:351603
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/9/3585/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/9/3585/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. van Leeuwen, Judith & van Tatenhove, Jan, 2010. "The triangle of marine governance in the environmental governance of Dutch offshore platforms," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 590-597, May.
    2. Martin Schnitzer & Lukas Haizinger, 2019. "Does the Olympic Agenda 2020 Have the Power to Create a New Olympic Heritage? An Analysis for the 2026 Winter Olympic Games Bid," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-21, January.
    3. Yi-De Liu, 2018. "Legacy Planning and Event Sustainability: Helsinki as the 2012 World Design Capital," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-13, July.
    4. John R. Gold & Margaret M. Gold, 2013. "“Bring It under the Legacy Umbrella”: Olympic Host Cities and the Changing Fortunes of the Sustainability Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(8), pages 1-17, August.
    5. Juliet Davis, 2019. "Futurescapes of urban regeneration: ten years of design for the unfolding urban legacy of London’s Olympic Games, 2008–2018," Planning Perspectives, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(5), pages 877-901, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jangwon Kim & Jongnye Han & Eunjeong Kim & Chulwon Kim, 2022. "Quality of Life Subjective Expectations and Exchange from Hosting Mega-Events," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-20, September.
    2. Anna-Maria Strittmatter & Dag Vidar Hanstad & Berit Skirstad, 2021. "Facilitating Sustainable Outcomes for the Organization of Youth Sports through Youth Engagement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-14, February.
    3. Imatitikua D. Aiyanyo & Hamman Samuel & Heuiseok Lim, 2021. "Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Classrooms: A Case Study on Foreigners in South Korea Using Applied Machine Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-15, April.
    4. Pengfei Shi & Alan Bairner, 2022. "Sustainable Development of Olympic Sport Participation Legacy: A Scoping Review Based on the PAGER Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-17, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Abel Meza Talavera & Sami G. Al-Ghamdi & Muammer Koç, 2019. "Sustainability in Mega-Events: Beyond Qatar 2022," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-27, November.
    2. Anna-Maria Strittmatter & Dag Vidar Hanstad & Berit Skirstad, 2021. "Facilitating Sustainable Outcomes for the Organization of Youth Sports through Youth Engagement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-14, February.
    3. Petri Lintumäki & Hannes Winner & Sabrina Scheiber & Anna Mederle & Martin Schnitzer, 2020. "The Economic Impact of Participant Sports Events: A Case Study for the Winter World Masters Games 2020 in Tyrol, Austria," Economies, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-23, November.
    4. Ji Wu & Madeleine Orr & Kurumi Aizawa & Yuhei Inoue, 2021. "Language Relativity in Legacy Literature: A Systematic Review in Multiple Languages," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-18, October.
    5. Iva Glibo & Laura Misener & Joerg Koenigstorfer, 2022. "Strategic Sustainable Development in International Sport Organisations: A Delphi Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-18, August.
    6. John Lauermann, 2014. "Competition through Interurban Policy Making: Bidding to Host Megaevents as Entrepreneurial Networking," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 46(11), pages 2638-2653, November.
    7. Ewa Malchrowicz-Mośko & Zuzana Botiková & Joanna Poczta, 2019. "“Because We Don’t Want to Run in Smog”: Problems with the Sustainable Management of Sport Event Tourism in Protected Areas (A Case Study of National Parks in Poland and Slovakia)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-20, January.
    8. van Leeuwen, Judith & Raakjaer, Jesper & van Hoof, Luc & van Tatenhove, Jan & Long, Ronán & Ounanian, Kristen, 2014. "Implementing the Marine Strategy Framework Directive: A policy perspective on regulatory, institutional and stakeholder impediments to effective implementation," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(PB), pages 325-330.
    9. Stattman, Sarah L. & Hospes, Otto & Mol, Arthur P.J., 2013. "Governing biofuels in Brazil: A comparison of ethanol and biodiesel policies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 22-30.
    10. Flávia Guerra & Yasemin Atalay, 2022. "The Energy Transition and the Changing Nature of Governance: Analyzing Evidence from the European Union and the Gulf Cooperation Council," Development, Palgrave Macmillan;Society for International Deveopment, vol. 65(1), pages 54-58, March.
    11. Mateusz Rozmiarek & Joanna Poczta & Ewa Malchrowicz-Mośko, 2021. "Motivations of Sports Volunteers at the 2023 European Games in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-14, June.
    12. Raakjaer, Jesper & Leeuwen, Judith van & Tatenhove, Jan van & Hadjimichael, Maria, 2014. "Ecosystem-based marine management in European regional seas calls for nested governance structures and coordination—A policy brief," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(PB), pages 373-381.
    13. Yi-De Liu, 2018. "Legacy Planning and Event Sustainability: Helsinki as the 2012 World Design Capital," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-13, July.
    14. Elsner, Paul & Suarez, Suzette, 2019. "Renewable energy from the high seas: Geo-spatial modelling of resource potential and legal implications for developing offshore wind projects beyond the national jurisdiction of coastal States," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 919-929.
    15. Jennifer Baumann, 2023. "Shifting to Sustainable Shipping: Actors and Power Shifts in Shipping Emissions in the IMO," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-16, August.
    16. Sergi Cerezo-Esteve & Eduard Inglés & Jordi Segui-Urbaneja & Francesc Solanellas, 2022. "The Environmental Impact of Major Sport Events (Giga, Mega and Major): A Systematic Review from 2000 to 2021," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-15, October.
    17. Xiaochen Gong & Yunxia Liu & Tao Sun, 2020. "Evaluating Climate Change Governance Using the “Polity–Policy–Politics” Framework: A Comparative Study of China and the United States," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-18, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:9:p:3585-:d:351603. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.