IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i24p10665-d465496.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Preparedness to Implement a Spatial Plan: The Impact of the Land Cooperative in Central Bangka Regency

Author

Listed:
  • Ragil Haryanto

    (Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Faculty of Engineering, Diponegoro University, Semarang 50275, Indonesia)

  • Imam Buchori

    (Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Faculty of Engineering, Diponegoro University, Semarang 50275, Indonesia)

  • Nany Yuliastuti

    (Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Faculty of Engineering, Diponegoro University, Semarang 50275, Indonesia)

  • Ibnu Saleh

    (Central Bangka Regency Government, Koba 33681, Indonesia)

  • Agung Sugiri

    (Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Faculty of Engineering, Diponegoro University, Semarang 50275, Indonesia)

  • Bagus Nuari

    (Urban Development Laboratory, Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Faculty of Engineering, Diponegoro University, Semarang 50275, Indonesia)

  • Nisriena Rachmi Putri

    (Urban Development Laboratory, Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Faculty of Engineering, Diponegoro University, Semarang 50275, Indonesia)

Abstract

Cities are currently struggling with increasingly limited land availability and rising land prices in urban areas. In this regard, proper land management can control land prices and optimize space to be effective, efficient and sustainable. This paper presents the results of research in Sungai Selan, a small city of Central Bangka Regency. It focuses on the forms of land management by determining the community and stakeholder readiness in a Land Cooperative Institution to implement a Detail Urban Spatial Plan (RDTRK), especially concerning land consolidation. We conducted this study during the Covid-19 pandemic and, therefore, research methods were adapted to suit the prevailing conditions by uploading expert priority choices online. The experts involved were those considered the main stakeholders of RDTRK implementation, such as representatives from the local government agencies, members of the Local Council of People Representative (DPRD), and selected members of cooperatives dealing with land and spatial issues. The results show that stakeholders are in general ready to establish land cooperatives and incorporate into RDTRK implementation with certain conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Ragil Haryanto & Imam Buchori & Nany Yuliastuti & Ibnu Saleh & Agung Sugiri & Bagus Nuari & Nisriena Rachmi Putri, 2020. "Preparedness to Implement a Spatial Plan: The Impact of the Land Cooperative in Central Bangka Regency," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-19, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:24:p:10665-:d:465496
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/24/10665/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/24/10665/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joshua Gans, 2015. "Weak versus strong net neutrality," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 183-200, April.
    2. Munnangi, Aswani Kumar & Lohani, Bharat & Misra, Subhas Chandra, 2020. "A review of land consolidation in the state of Uttar Pradesh, India: Qualitative approach," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    3. Yuan, Feng & Wei, Yehua Dennis & Xiao, Weiye, 2019. "Land marketization, fiscal decentralization, and the dynamics of urban land prices in transitional China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    4. Karen C. Seto & Robert K. Kaufmann, 2003. "Modeling the Drivers of Urban Land Use Change in the Pearl River Delta, China: Integrating Remote Sensing with Socioeconomic Data," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 79(1), pages 106-121.
    5. Edi Purwanto & Agung Sugiri & Rony Novian, 2017. "Determined Slum Upgrading: A Challenge to Participatory Planning in Nanga Bulik, Central Kalimantan, Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-18, July.
    6. Qin, Yu & Zhu, Hongjia & Zhu, Rong, 2016. "Changes in the distribution of land prices in urban China during 2007–2012," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 77-90.
    7. Tione, Sarah E. & Holden , Stein T., 2019. "Urban proximity, demand for land and land prices in Malawi," CLTS Working Papers 1/19, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Centre for Land Tenure Studies, revised 16 Oct 2019.
    8. Tione, Sarah E. & Holden, Stein T., 2020. "Urban proximity, demand for land and land shadow prices in Malawi," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    9. Christopher A. Manning, 1988. "The Determinants of Intercity Home Building Site Price Differences," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 64(1), pages 1-14.
    10. Trias Aditya & Eva Maria-Unger & Christelle vd Berg & Rohan Bennett & Paul Saers & Han Lukman Syahid & Doni Erwan & Tjeerd Wits & Nurrohmat Widjajanti & Purnama Budi Santosa & Dedi Atunggal & Imam Han, 2020. "Participatory Land Administration in Indonesia: Quality and Usability Assessment," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-27, March.
    11. Fabio R. Chaddad & Michael L. Cook, 2004. "Understanding New Cooperative Models: An Ownership–Control Rights Typology," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 26(3), pages 348-360.
    12. Fabio R. Chaddad & Michael L. Cook, 2004. "Understanding New Cooperative Models: An Ownership–Control Rights Typology," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 26(3), pages 348-360.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jiao Zhang & Qian Wang & Yiping Xia & Katsunori Furuya, 2022. "Knowledge Map of Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development: A Visual Analysis Using CiteSpace," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-24, February.
    2. Alina Maciejewska & Łukasz Kuzak & Marianna Ulanicka-Raczyńska & Kamil Moreau, 2022. "Land Management Using Land Reserves to Alleviate Emergencies on the Example of Warsaw," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-19, September.
    3. Wini Fetia Wardhiani & Tuti Karyani & Iwan Setiawan & Ery Supriyadi Rustidja, 2023. "The Effect of Performance on the Sustainability of Coffee Farmers’ Cooperatives in the Industrial Revolution 4.0 in West Java Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-10, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Damien Rousselière, 2019. "A Flexible Approach to Age Dependence in Organizational Mortality: Comparing the Life Duration for Cooperative and Non-Cooperative Enterprises Using a Bayesian Generalized Additive Discrete Time Survi," Journal of Quantitative Economics, Springer;The Indian Econometric Society (TIES), vol. 17(4), pages 829-855, December.
    2. Hueth, Brent & Marcoul, Philippe, 2007. "The Cooperative Firm as Monitored Credit," Staff Paper Series 508, University of Wisconsin, Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    3. Berends, Jared & Rich, Karl M. & Kaitibie, Simeon & Lyne, Michael C., 2021. "Ex-ante evaluation of interventions to upgrade pork value chains in Southern Myanmar," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    4. Henry Leung & Frank Furfaro, 2020. "Comovement of dairy product futures and firm value: returns and volatility," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 64(3), pages 632-654, July.
    5. Maryline Filippi, 2014. "Using the Regional Advantage: French Agricultural Cooperatives' Economic and Governance Tool," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 85(4), pages 597-615, December.
    6. Hendrikse, G., 2006. "Challenges facing Agricultural Cooperatives: Heterogeneity and Consolidation," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 41, March.
    7. Achilleas Kontogeorgos & Panagiota Sergaki & Anastasia Kosma & Vassiliki Semou, 2018. "Organizational Models for Agricultural Cooperatives: Empirical Evidence for their Performance," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 9(4), pages 1123-1137, December.
    8. Karin Hakelius & Jerker Nilsson, 2020. "The Logic behind the Internal Governance of Sweden’s Largest Agricultural Cooperatives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-19, October.
    9. Jasper Grashuis, 2018. "An Exploratory Study of Cooperative Survival: Strategic Adaptation to External Developments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-15, February.
    10. Jasper GRASHUIS & Ye SU, 2019. "A Review Of The Empirical Literature On Farmer Cooperatives: Performance, Ownership And Governance, Finance, And Member Attitude," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 90(1), pages 77-102, March.
    11. Nazik Beishenaly & Frédéric Dufays, 2023. "Entrepreneurial ecosystem for cooperatives: The case of Kyrgyz agricultural cooperatives," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 94(4), pages 1173-1198, December.
    12. Salil Bhattarai & Michael C. Lyne & Sandra K. Martin, 2015. "Analysing the robustness of spice chains in Nepal from a smallholder perspective," Asian Journal of Agriculture and rural Development, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 5(4), pages 88-102, April.
    13. Jos Bijman & Markus Hanisch & Ger Sangen, 2014. "Shifting Control? The Change of Internal Governance in Agricultural Cooperatives in the EU," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 85(4), pages 641-661, December.
    14. Thomas Kopp & Ashok K. Mishra, 2022. "Perishability and market power in Nepalese food crop production," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 73(2), pages 518-540, June.
    15. Salil, Bhattarai & Michael C., Lyne & Sandra K., Martin, 2015. "Analysing the robustness of spice chains in Nepal from a smallholder perspective," Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development, Asian Economic and Social Society (AESS), vol. 5(04), pages 1-15, April.
    16. Yuan, Feng & Wei, Yehua Dennis & Xiao, Weiye, 2019. "Land marketization, fiscal decentralization, and the dynamics of urban land prices in transitional China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    17. Tomáš RATINGER & Iveta BOŠKOVÁ, 2013. "Strategies and effects of milk producers' organisations in the Czech Republic," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 59(3), pages 113-124.
    18. Yuling Gao & Zuhui Huang & Qiao Liang, 2018. "Service Realization And Determinants In Agricultural Cooperatives In China: Evidence From Zhejiang, Sichuan And Heilongjiang Provinces," The Singapore Economic Review (SER), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 63(05), pages 1205-1225, December.
    19. Yu, L. & Huang, W., 2018. "Non-economic societal impact or economic revenue? Performance and efficiency analysis of farmer cooperatives in China," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277512, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    20. Xiaoyan Qian & Tava Lennon Olsen, 2020. "Operational and Financial Decisions Within Proportional Investment Cooperatives," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(3), pages 545-561, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:24:p:10665-:d:465496. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.