IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i24p10436-d461605.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Big Data as a Tool to Monitor and Deter Environmental Offenders in the Global South: A Multiple Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Nir Kshetri

    (Department of Management, University of North Carolina-Greensboro, 1400 Spring Garden St, Greensboro, NC 27412, USA)

  • Diana Carolina Rojas Torres

    (International School of Economic and Administrative Sciences, University de La Sabana, Chía 250001, Colombia)

  • Hany Besada

    (Institute of African Studies, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel by Dr, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, Canada
    United Nations Office for South-South Cooperation, 304 E. 45th Street, New York, NY 10017, USA)

  • Maria Andreina Moros Ochoa

    (Colegio de Estudios Superiores de Administración, Diagonal 35 #5a-57, Santa Fé, Bogotá 110311, Colombia)

Abstract

While prior research has looked at big data’s role in strengthening the environmental justice movement, scholars rarely examine the contexts, mechanisms and processes associated with the use of big data in monitoring and deterring environmental offenders, especially in the Global South. As such, this research aims to substitute for this academic gap through the use of multiple case studies of environmental offenders’ engagement in illegal deforestation, as well as legal deforestation followed by fire. Specifically, we have chosen four cases from three economies in the Global South: Indonesia, Peru and Brazil. We demonstrate how the data utilized by environmental activists in these four cases qualify as true forms of big data, as they have searched and aggregated data from various sources and employed them to achieve their goals. The article shows how big data from various sources, mainly from satellite imagery, can help discern the true extent of environmental destruction caused by various offenders and present convincing evidence. The article also discusses how a rich satellite imagery archive is suitable for analyzing chronological events in order to establish a cause-effect chain. In all of the cases studied, such evidentiary provisions have been used by environmental activists to oblige policy makers to take necessary actions to counter environmental offenses.

Suggested Citation

  • Nir Kshetri & Diana Carolina Rojas Torres & Hany Besada & Maria Andreina Moros Ochoa, 2020. "Big Data as a Tool to Monitor and Deter Environmental Offenders in the Global South: A Multiple Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-12, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:24:p:10436-:d:461605
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/24/10436/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/24/10436/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shahzad (Shaz) Ansari & Raghu Garud & Arun Kumaraswamy, 2016. "The disruptor's dilemma: TiVo and the U.S. television ecosystem," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(9), pages 1829-1853, September.
    2. Laura J. Sonter & Diego Herrera & Damian J. Barrett & Gillian L. Galford & Chris J. Moran & Britaldo S. Soares-Filho, 2017. "Mining drives extensive deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 8(1), pages 1-7, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mazhar Javed Awan & Umar Farooq & Hafiz Muhammad Aqeel Babar & Awais Yasin & Haitham Nobanee & Muzammil Hussain & Owais Hakeem & Azlan Mohd Zain, 2021. "Real-Time DDoS Attack Detection System Using Big Data Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-19, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yuliya Snihur & Llewellyn D. W. Thomas & Robert A. Burgelman, 2018. "An Ecosystem‐Level Process Model of Business Model Disruption: The Disruptor's Gambit," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(7), pages 1278-1316, November.
    2. Haruo Awano & Masaharu Tsujimoto, 2022. "Mechanisms for Business Ecosystem Members to Capture Value through the Strong Network Effect," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-13, September.
    3. Bouncken, Ricarda B. & Fredrich, Viktor & Kraus, Sascha & Ritala, Paavo, 2020. "Innovation alliances: Balancing value creation dynamics, competitive intensity and market overlap," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 240-247.
    4. Prince T. Mabey & Wei Li & Abu J. Sundufu & Akhtar H. Lashari, 2020. "Environmental Impacts: Local Perspectives of Selected Mining Edge Communities in Sierra Leone," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-16, July.
    5. Hou, Hong & Shi, Yongjiang, 2021. "Ecosystem-as-structure and ecosystem-as-coevolution: A constructive examination," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    6. Arnauld Bessagnet & Joan Crespo & Jerome Vicente, 2023. "How is the literature on Digital Entrepreneurial Ecosystems structured? A socio-semantic network approach," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 2320, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Oct 2023.
    7. Conceição, Katyanne V. & Chaves, Michel E.D. & Picoli, Michelle C.A. & Sánchez, Alber H. & Soares, Anderson R. & Mataveli, Guilherme A.V. & Silva, Daniel E. & Costa, Joelma S. & Camara, Gilberto, 2021. "Government policies endanger the indigenous peoples of the Brazilian Amazon," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    8. Shengyuan Wang, 2022. "Exploring the Sustainability of China’s New Energy Vehicle Development: Fresh Evidence from Population Symbiosis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-21, August.
    9. Melissa Anne Beryl Vogt, 2021. "Ecological sensitivity within human realities concept for improved functional biodiversity outcomes in agricultural systems and landscapes," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-19, December.
    10. Thomas, Llewellyn D.W. & Autio, Erkko & Gann, David M., 2022. "Processes of ecosystem emergence," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    11. Yuki Inoue & Takeshi Takenaka & Takami Kasasaku & Tadafumi Tamegai & Ryohei Arai, 2023. "How to design platform ecosystems by intrapreneurs: Implications from action design research on IoT-based platform," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-26, December.
    12. Liu, Gordon & Aroean, Lukman & Ko, Wai Wai, 2023. "Service innovation in business ecosystem: The roles of shared goals, coopetition, and interfirm power," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    13. Corbo, Leonardo & Kraus, Sascha & Vlačić, Božidar & Dabić, Marina & Caputo, Andrea & Pellegrini, Massimiliano M., 2023. "Coopetition and innovation: A review and research agenda," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    14. Ferrante, Lucas & Andrade, Maryane B.T. & Fearnside, Philip M., 2021. "Land grabbing on Brazil's Highway BR-319 as a spearhead for Amazonian deforestation," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    15. Bixiang Shi & Fangcheng Tang & Fenfen Wei, 2022. "The Path Constitution of Platform Evolution: An Organizational Momentum View," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-22, July.
    16. Mario Coccia, 2017. "Disruptive technologies and competitive advantage of firms in dynamic markets," IRCrES Working Paper 201704, CNR-IRCrES Research Institute on Sustainable Economic Growth - Moncalieri (TO) ITALY - former Institute for Economic Research on Firms and Growth - Torino (TO) ITALY.
    17. Sean T. Hsu & Susan K. Cohen, 2022. "Overcoming the Incumbent Dilemma: The Dual Roles of Multimarket Contact During Disruption," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(2), pages 319-348, March.
    18. Shi, Xianwei & Shi, Yongjiang, 2022. "Unpacking the process of resource allocation within an entrepreneurial ecosystem," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(9).
    19. Shi, Xianwei & Liang, Xingkun & Luo, Yining, 2023. "Unpacking the intellectual structure of ecosystem research in innovation studies," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(6).
    20. Jacques Bughin & Nicolas van Zeebroeck, 2024. "Strategic Renewal and Corporate Return of Digital Transformation," Working Papers TIMES² 2024-071, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:24:p:10436-:d:461605. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.