IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i22p9350-d443067.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Environmental Enhancement through High-Rise Building Refurbishment

Author

Listed:
  • Yani Rahmawati

    (Civil and Environmental Engineering, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Seri Iskandar 32610, Malaysia)

  • Christiono Utomo

    (Civil Engineering, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya 60111, Indonesia)

  • Nur Suhailah Muhamad Sukri

    (Civil and Environmental Engineering, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Seri Iskandar 32610, Malaysia)

  • Rezi Berliana Yasinta

    (Civil Engineering, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya 60111, Indonesia)

  • Al-Hussein Mohammed Hassan Al-Aidrous

    (Civil and Environmental Engineering, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Seri Iskandar 32610, Malaysia)

Abstract

Property investment is always enticing, especially the high-rise residential property. The promise of the raising future value of it keeps investors attracted. Urbanisation also contributes to the massive development in this business, and it is hardly ignored. To run the business and to be able to compete with others, developers have to keep the cost attracted for the residents/buyers. The property needs to be well designed to satisfy the economical capital expenditure as well as low operation and maintenance cost. The high density of this development in an urban area makes developers tend to have low awareness of practising sustainability. Inconsistent evaluation, as well as unwell-defined assessment for sustainability, worsen the situation. This research aims to investigate and develop performance evaluation criteria of sustainability for high-rise residential building. Both qualitative and quantitative approaches were implemented through surveys. Three main factors, which are the promotion of a healthy environment, comfortability of residents and energy-saving, found to be the main categories of criteria to be considered. Based on validation through a case study, it is found that providing easy access to public transport is the most critical criteria for promoting a healthy environment. Besides, the usage of low Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) paint can give comfort to residents because it provides healthy indoor air quality. Lastly, the usage of LED bulbs and natural light supports energy saving. The criteria are then used to develop the decision-making model in selecting the best alternative for the building refurbishment, by using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). Application of the decision model in a case study reveals that repainting the building using low VOC paint become the best fit option for enhancing the environment. Developers may implement this in their policy for the redevelopment of their building. The result is limited to the aggregation value; thus, future research is directing into coalition and negotiation among stakeholders by applying payoff optimum and agreement options and also automation in selecting the best technical solution.

Suggested Citation

  • Yani Rahmawati & Christiono Utomo & Nur Suhailah Muhamad Sukri & Rezi Berliana Yasinta & Al-Hussein Mohammed Hassan Al-Aidrous, 2020. "Environmental Enhancement through High-Rise Building Refurbishment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-14, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:22:p:9350-:d:443067
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/22/9350/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/22/9350/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nayyar Hussain Mirjat & Mohammad Aslam Uqaili & Khanji Harijan & Mohd Wazir Mustafa & Md. Mizanur Rahman & M. Waris Ali Khan, 2018. "Multi-Criteria Analysis of Electricity Generation Scenarios for Sustainable Energy Planning in Pakistan," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-33, March.
    2. Efthimios Bakogiannis & Thanos Vlastos & Konstantinos Athanasopoulos & Avgi Vassi & Georgia Christodoulopoulou & Christos Karolemeas & Stefanos Tsigdinos & Charalampos Kyriakidis & Maria-Stella Noutso, 2020. "Exploring Motivators and Deterrents of Cycling Tourism Using Qualitative Social Research Methods and Participative Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-15, March.
    3. Yun-Shang Chiou & Satryo Saputro & Dany Perwita Sari, 2020. "Visual Comfort in Modern University Classrooms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-35, May.
    4. Yung Yau & Kwong Wing Chau & Daniel Chi Wing Ho & Siu Kei Wong, 2008. "An empirical study on the positive externality of building refurbishment," International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 1(1), pages 19-32, April.
    5. Markus Surmann & Wolfgang A. Brunauer & Sven Bienert, 2016. "The Energy Efficiency of Corporate Real Estate Assets: The Role of Energy Management for Corporate Environmental Performance ," ERES eres2016_139, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
    6. Anh-Duc Pham & Quang Trung Nguyen & Duc Long Luong & Quynh Chau Truong, 2020. "The Development of a Decision Support Model for Eco-Friendly Material Selection in Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-19, April.
    7. David Lorenz & Thomas Lützkendorf, 2008. "Sustainability in property valuation: theory and practice," Journal of Property Investment & Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 26(6), pages 482-521, September.
    8. Yan Ning & Yadi Li & Shuangshuang Yang & Chuanjing Ju, 2016. "Exploring Socio-Technical Features of Green Interior Design of Residential Buildings: Indicators, Interdependence and Embeddedness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-15, December.
    9. Hsu-Lin Chen & Yi-Chung Hu & Ming-Yen Lee & Ghi-Feng Yen, 2020. "Importance of Employee Care in Corporate Social Responsibility: An AHP-Based Study from the Perspective of Corporate Commitment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-15, July.
    10. Karl Wagner, 2014. "Generation of a Tropically Adapted Energy Performance Certificate for Residential Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(12), pages 1-17, November.
    11. Zhenwen Liu & Hsi-Chi Yang & Yan-Chyuan Shiau, 2020. "Investigation on Evaluation Framework of Elementary School Teaching Materials for Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-19, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Qiang, Guofeng & Tang, Shu & Hao, Jianli & Di Sarno, Luigi & Wu, Guangdong & Ren, Shaoxing, 2023. "Building automation systems for energy and comfort management in green buildings: A critical review and future directions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Beryl Wong Xin Xian & Yani Rahmawati & Al-Hussein Mohammed Hassan Al-Aidrous & Christiono Utomo & Noor Amila Wan Abdullah Zawawi & Raflis, 2021. "Value-Based Decision to Redevelop Transportation Facilities: A Case Study of an Abandoned Airport," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-24, April.
    2. Yung-Lun Liu & Pen-Fa Ko & Jui-Te Chiang, 2021. "Developing an Evaluation Model for Monitoring Country-Based Tourism Competitiveness," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, September.
    3. Camila Gregório-Atem & Carolina Aparicio-Fernández & Helena Coch & José-Luis Vivancos, 2020. "Opaque Ventilated Façade (OVF) Thermal Performance Simulation for Office Buildings in Brazil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-15, September.
    4. Mojtaba Ashour & Amir Mahdiyar & Syarmila Hany Haron, 2021. "A Comprehensive Review of Deterrents to the Practice of Sustainable Interior Architecture and Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-19, September.
    5. Nappi-Choulet, Ingrid & Décamps, Aurélien, 2011. "Is Sustainability Attractive for Corporate Real Estate Decisions ?," ESSEC Working Papers WP1106, ESSEC Research Center, ESSEC Business School.
    6. Emel Yontar & Onur Derse, 2023. "Evaluation of sustainable energy action plan strategies with a SWOT/TWOS-based AHP/ANP approach: a case study," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(6), pages 5691-5715, June.
    7. Fuerst, Franz & Warren-Myers, Georgia, 2018. "Does voluntary disclosure create a green lemon problem? Energy-efficiency ratings and house prices," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 1-12.
    8. Aliyu Ibrahim Saidu & Chunho Yeom, 2020. "Success Criteria Evaluation for a Sustainable and Affordable Housing Model: A Case for Improving Household Welfare in Nigeria Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-16, January.
    9. Abdulla Alabbasi & Jhuma Sadhukhan & Matthew Leach & Mohammed Sanduk, 2022. "Sustainable Indicators for Integrating Renewable Energy in Bahrain’s Power Generation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-19, May.
    10. Cheng-An Tsai & Tien-Hwa Ho & Jyh-Shyan Lin & Chien-Chih Tu & Che-Wei Chang, 2021. "Model for Evaluating Outsourcing Logistics Companies in the COVID-19 Pandemic," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-15, September.
    11. Saraswat, S.K. & Digalwar, Abhijeet K., 2021. "Evaluation of energy alternatives for sustainable development of energy sector in India: An integrated Shannon’s entropy fuzzy multi-criteria decision approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 58-74.
    12. Ingrid Nappi-Choulet & Aurélien Decamps, 2012. "The impact of energy efficiency and green performance on the value of corporate real estate portfolios," ERES eres2012_145, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
    13. Fabiana Silvero & Fernanda Rodrigues & Sergio Montelpare, 2019. "A Parametric Study and Performance Evaluation of Energy Retrofit Solutions for Buildings Located in the Hot-Humid Climate of Paraguay—Sensitivity Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-27, January.
    14. Xiaojing Zhao & Tengyuan Chang & Bon-Gang Hwang & Xiaopeng Deng, 2017. "Critical Factors Influencing Business Model Innovation for Sustainable Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-19, December.
    15. Katalin Lőrincz & Zsuzsanna Banász & János Csapó, 2020. "Customer Involvement in Sustainable Tourism Planning at Lake Balaton, Hungary—Analysis of the Consumer Preferences of the Active Cycling Tourists," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-18, June.
    16. Shirlene Jane Nicole & Suddin Lada & Rudy Ansar & Azaze-Azizi Abdul Adis & Lim Ming Fook & Brahim Chekima, 2022. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Strategic Management: A Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-14, August.
    17. Chang Han & Yuxuan Zhao & Zhenzhi Lin & Yi Ding & Li Yang & Guanqiang Lin & Tianwen Mo & Xiaojun Ye, 2018. "Critical Lines Identification for Skeleton-Network of Power Systems under Extreme Weather Conditions Based on the Modified VIKOR Method," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-18, May.
    18. Shoaib Ahmed Khatri & Nayyar Hussain Mirjat & Khanji Harijan & Mohammad Aslam Uqaili & Syed Feroz Shah & Pervez Hameed Shaikh & Laveet Kumar, 2022. "An Overview of the Current Energy Situation of Pakistan and the Way Forward towards Green Energy Implementation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-27, December.
    19. Solangi, Yasir Ahmed & Longsheng, Cheng & Shah, Syed Ahsan Ali, 2021. "Assessing and overcoming the renewable energy barriers for sustainable development in Pakistan: An integrated AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 209-222.
    20. Lifen Bai & Binbin Yang & Shichong Yuan, 2023. "Evaluating of Education Effects of Online Learning for Local University Students in China: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-13, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:22:p:9350-:d:443067. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.