IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i14p5552-d382493.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How the Dead Storage of Consumer Electronics Creates Consumer Value

Author

Listed:
  • Mikkel Nøjgaard

    (Department of Marketing & Management, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230 Odense, Denmark)

  • Cristiano Smaniotto

    (Department of Business Development and Technology, Aarhus University, Birk Centerpark 15, 7400 Herning, Denmark)

  • Søren Askegaard

    (Department of Marketing & Management, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230 Odense, Denmark)

  • Ciprian Cimpan

    (Department of Chemical Engineering, Biotechnology and Environmental Technology, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230 Odense, Denmark)

  • Dmitry Zhilyaev

    (Department of Chemical Engineering, Biotechnology and Environmental Technology, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230 Odense, Denmark)

  • Henrik Wenzel

    (Department of Chemical Engineering, Biotechnology and Environmental Technology, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230 Odense, Denmark)

Abstract

Consumers across the globe tend to store their small electronic devices when they reach their end of life instead of disposing of them. This is a problem because if end-of-life devices are not recovered from consumers’ homes, the devices cannot be re-used or recycled, leading to increased production. We study what motivates consumers to store their end-of-life devices by looking at how storage creates consumer value. Applying a practice-based understanding of value, we find that storage is a social practice that generates value by protecting consumers from four different kinds of risk: practical risks, existential risks, environmental risks, and moral risks. Storage gives consumers a sense of security in their everyday lives and thus generates what we call ‘security value’. This notion implies that even though end-of-life devices sit idle in consumers’ homes, their value generating capacity remains active. The findings have implications for the role of consumers in reverse logistics strategies for sustainable systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Mikkel Nøjgaard & Cristiano Smaniotto & Søren Askegaard & Ciprian Cimpan & Dmitry Zhilyaev & Henrik Wenzel, 2020. "How the Dead Storage of Consumer Electronics Creates Consumer Value," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-16, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:14:p:5552-:d:382493
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/14/5552/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/14/5552/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lastovicka, John L, et al, 1999. "Lifestyle of the Tight and Frugal: Theory and Measurement," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 26(1), pages 85-98, June.
    2. Thompson, Craig J & Pollio, Howard R & Locander, William B, 1994. "The Spoken and the Unspoken: A Hermeneutic Approach to Understanding the Cultural Viewpoints That Underlie Consumers' Expressed Meanings," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 21(3), pages 432-452, December.
    3. Yi-Tse Fang & Hsin Rau, 2017. "Optimal Consumer Electronics Product Take-Back Time with Consideration of Consumer Value," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-17, March.
    4. Cucchiella, Federica & D’Adamo, Idiano & Lenny Koh, S.C. & Rosa, Paolo, 2015. "Recycling of WEEEs: An economic assessment of present and future e-waste streams," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 263-272.
    5. Juana Camacho-Otero & Casper Boks & Ida Nilstad Pettersen, 2018. "Consumption in the Circular Economy: A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-25, August.
    6. Belk, Russell W, 1988. "Possessions and the Extended Self," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 15(2), pages 139-168, September.
    7. Fleura Bardhi & Giana M. Eckhardt, 2012. "Access-Based Consumption: The Case of Car Sharing," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 39(4), pages 881-898.
    8. Amber M. Epp & Linda L. Price, 2010. "The Storied Life of Singularized Objects: Forces of Agency and Network Transformation," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 36(5), pages 820-837, February.
    9. Benjamin Saunders & Julius Sim & Tom Kingstone & Shula Baker & Jackie Waterfield & Bernadette Bartlam & Heather Burroughs & Clare Jinks, 2018. "Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(4), pages 1893-1907, July.
    10. Simone Wurster & Rita Schulze, 2020. "Consumers’ Acceptance of a Bio-circular Automotive Economy: Explanatory Model and Influence Factors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-22, March.
    11. Thompson, Craig J & Locander, William B & Pollio, Howard R, 1989. "Putting Consumer Experience Back into Consumer Research: The Philosophy and Method of Existential-Phenomenology," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 16(2), pages 133-146, September.
    12. Fleura Bardhi & Giana M. Eckhardt & Eric J. Arnould, 2012. "Liquid Relationship to Possessions," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 39(3), pages 510-529.
    13. Meltem Türe & Güliz Ger, 2016. "Continuity Through Change: Navigating Temporalities Through Heirloom Rejuvenation," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 43(1), pages 1-25.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hilal Shams & Altaf Hossain Molla & Mohd Nizam Ab Rahman & Hawa Hishamuddin & Zambri Harun & Nallapaneni Manoj Kumar, 2023. "Exploring Industry-Specific Research Themes on E-Waste: A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-22, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Karin Brondino-Pompeo, 2021. "Mapping spheres of exchange: a multidimensional approach to commoditization and singularization," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 11(1), pages 81-95, June.
    2. Mike Molesworth & Rebecca Watkins & Janice Denegri-Knott, 2016. "Possession Work on Hosted Digital Consumption Objects as Consumer Ensnarement," Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, University of Chicago Press, vol. 1(2), pages 246-261.
    3. Rojas Gaviria, Pilar, 2016. "Oneself for another: The construction of intimacy in a world of strangers," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(1), pages 83-93.
    4. repec:oup:jecgeo:v:50:y:2023:i:2:p:282-302. is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Pilar Rojas Gaviria, 2012. "Three essays on how sharing and consuming support home place reconnection in contemporary liquid times," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/209597, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    6. Masset, Julie & Decrop, Alain, 2016. "“God, I have so many ashtrays!” Dependences and dependencies in consumer–possession relationships," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(1), pages 94-109.
    7. Justyna Kramarczyk & Mathieu Alemany Oliver, 2022. "Accumulative vs. Appreciative Expressions of Materialism: Revising Materialism in Light of Polish Simplifiers and New Materialism," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 175(4), pages 701-719, February.
    8. Paul Rogers, 2021. "Rented But MINE! Application of Psychological Ownership Theory to Access-Based Consumption and the Circular Economy," Circular Economy and Sustainability,, Springer.
    9. Myriam Ertz & Fabien Durif & Manon Arcand, 2019. "A conceptual perspective on collaborative consumption," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 9(1), pages 27-41, June.
    10. Sabrina V. Helm & Victoria Ligon & Tony Stovall & Silvia Riper, 2018. "Consumer interpretations of digital ownership in the book market," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 28(2), pages 177-189, May.
    11. Khalek, Sk Abu & Chakraborty, Anirban, 2023. "Access or collaboration? A typology of sharing economy," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 186(PA).
    12. Loussaïef, Leïla & Ulrich, Isabelle & Damay, Coralie, 2019. "How does access to luxury fashion challenge self-identity? Exploring women's practices of joint and non-ownership," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 263-272.
    13. Zeynep Arsel & Darren DahlEditor & Eileen FischerEditor & Gita JoharEditor & Vicki MorwitzEditor, 2017. "Asking Questions with Reflexive Focus: A Tutorial on Designing and Conducting Interviews," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 44(4), pages 939-948.
    14. Llamas, Rosa & Thomsen, Thyra Uth, 2016. "The luxury of igniting change by giving: Transforming yourself while transforming others' lives," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(1), pages 166-176.
    15. de Waal Malefyt, Timothy, 2015. "Relationship advertising: How advertising can enhance social bonds," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(12), pages 2494-2502.
    16. Giovanna Magnani & Beatrice Re, 2020. "Lived experiences about car sharing in young adults: Emerging paradoxes," Italian Journal of Marketing, Springer, vol. 2020(2), pages 207-229, September.
    17. Giovanna Magnani & Tommaso Bertolotti & Antonella Zucchella, 2018. "Cognitive aspects of car sharing in Millennials. Active sharers and reluctant users," MERCATI & COMPETITIVIT?, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2018(1), pages 39-62.
    18. Stacey Menzel Baker & Courtney Nations Baker, 2016. "The Bounce in Our Steps from Shared Material Resources in Cultural Trauma and Recovery," Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, University of Chicago Press, vol. 1(2), pages 314-335.
    19. Murtaza Haider & Randall Shannon & George P. Moschis, 2022. "Sustainable Consumption Research and the Role of Marketing: A Review of the Literature (1976–2021)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-36, March.
    20. Marco Pichierri & Daniele Scarpi & Gabriele Pizzi, 2018. "To buy or to rent? An experimental study on the antecedents of consumers? acquisition-mode decisions," MERCATI & COMPETITIVIT?, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2018(1), pages 63-92.
    21. Bäckström, Kristina, 2011. "“Shopping as leisure: An exploration of manifoldness and dynamics in consumers shopping experiencesâ€," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 18(3), pages 200-209.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:14:p:5552-:d:382493. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.